It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Abolish the federal reserve
Originally posted by SGTGerman
reply to post by Neo_Serf
United we stand, divided we fall. Anarchy will never, ever reach the success a united nation will achieve. FACT. It wont help the economy either.
Only a nationalist style government will solve the economic problems we have today because the whole aim of nationalism is supporting one's people. Not like our governments now whose aim is to sell us out to the highest bidder.
Originally posted by Flatfish
IMO, the answer is really quite simple. The USA as well as every industrialized and/or emerging economy should, for it's own protection, adopt legislation mandating that products be manufactured in the same nation in which they are to be sold, with the exception of raw materials.
Originally posted by Neo_Serf
Originally posted by Flatfish
IMO, the answer is really quite simple. The USA as well as every industrialized and/or emerging economy should, for it's own protection, adopt legislation mandating that products be manufactured in the same nation in which they are to be sold, with the exception of raw materials.
Im sorry but the answer is NOT simple, because if it was it would have been solved long ago and wed all live in protectionist heaven.
I didnt read further into your post because you seem to think, in your opinion, that returning to the dark ages is the simple answer every other dummy just hasnt thought of or is too stupid to grasp.
Seriously man, and not to be condescending but im sure this will come off as such; pick up an econ 101 book and realize just how catastrophic your plan would be if enacted, which it most surely would not be, as it would be a surefire way to absolutely reverse and destroy all the progress weve made as a species since the dark ages.
And just for fun. i might ask: what moral rule would you say justifies myself not selling my used XBOX games on ebay to someone in the States, who live just a few short kms from me? Would you oppose my selling of this game to him in a voluntary and peaceful way? If so, what means should be employed in order to stop us from doing so?
Originally posted by Flatfish
Originally posted by Neo_Serf
Originally posted by Flatfish
IMO, the answer is really quite simple. The USA as well as every industrialized and/or emerging economy should, for it's own protection, adopt legislation mandating that products be manufactured in the same nation in which they are to be sold, with the exception of raw materials.
Im sorry but the answer is NOT simple, because if it was it would have been solved long ago and wed all live in protectionist heaven.
I didnt read further into your post because you seem to think, in your opinion, that returning to the dark ages is the simple answer every other dummy just hasnt thought of or is too stupid to grasp.
Seriously man, and not to be condescending but im sure this will come off as such; pick up an econ 101 book and realize just how catastrophic your plan would be if enacted, which it most surely would not be, as it would be a surefire way to absolutely reverse and destroy all the progress weve made as a species since the dark ages.
And just for fun. i might ask: what moral rule would you say justifies myself not selling my used XBOX games on ebay to someone in the States, who live just a few short kms from me? Would you oppose my selling of this game to him in a voluntary and peaceful way? If so, what means should be employed in order to stop us from doing so?
I'm not sure what's so complicated about it and I doubt it would take us back to the "dark ages" either. If we don't protect our own economic base, then who does? Corporations? In case you hadn't noticed, corporations take an oath, so to speak, to remain loyal to the almighty profit margin and not to any specific country.
I'm not saying that we totally eliminate importing or exporting all products, hell I'm a retired longshoreman, my entire career was spent in that business. I'm just saying that we scrutinize the process a lot more closely. If a company wants to sell a product in a foreign country, why can't they build it right there where they're going to sell it? Is it because they won't be able to screw the living hell out of the consumer by selling it in an established economy for 1000 times what it cost to make it in an emerging one? Greed cannot be left unchecked!
With respect to your used XBOX games, to be quite honest I hadn't given that much thought to used product sales but I'm sure that something could be figured out that would accommodate sales, while at the same time, put safeguards in place to insure that "Used Product Sales" weren't being used as a "Front" for evading trade laws.
The only thing I know for sure is that if we want or expect different results, then we are going to have to try a different approach.
I'm not sure what's so complicated about it and I doubt it would take us back to the "dark ages" either. If we don't protect our own economic base, then who does? Corporations? In case you hadn't noticed, corporations take an oath, so to speak, to remain loyal to the almighty profit margin and not to any specific country.
I'm not saying that we totally eliminate importing or exporting all products, hell I'm a retired longshoreman, my entire career was spent in that business. I'm just saying that we scrutinize the process a lot more closely. If a company wants to sell a product in a foreign country, why can't they build it right there where they're going to sell it? Is it because they won't be able to screw the living hell out of the consumer by selling it in an established economy for 1000 times what it cost to make it in an emerging one? Greed cannot be left unchecked!
With respect to your used XBOX games, to be quite honest I hadn't given that much thought to used product sales but I'm sure that something could be figured out that would accommodate sales, while at the same time, put safeguards in place to insure that "Used Product Sales" weren't being used as a "Front" for evading trade laws.
The only thing I know for sure is that if we want or expect different results, then we are going to have to try a different approach.
Originally posted by Neo_Serf
Originally posted by SGTGerman
reply to post by Neo_Serf
United we stand, divided we fall. Anarchy will never, ever reach the success a united nation will achieve. FACT. It wont help the economy either.
Only a nationalist style government will solve the economic problems we have today because the whole aim of nationalism is supporting one's people. Not like our governments now whose aim is to sell us out to the highest bidder.
Hmm, well you seem to have the most vexing and destructive problem that faces humanity all sorted out and squared away, in a couple short paragraphs to boot! All the accumulated wisdom and mistakes paid in the blood of millions was all for naught, seeing as all we had to do was to wait for SGTGerman to come along and set us all strait via a few short lines of opinion guised as well reasoned FACT!
You sir, have convinced me, somehow, that violence does indeed work, and work well! How foolish was I to question the wisdom of the Gun.
Originally posted by SGTGerman
Originally posted by Neo_Serf
Originally posted by SGTGerman
reply to post by Neo_Serf
United we stand, divided we fall. Anarchy will never, ever reach the success a united nation will achieve. FACT. It wont help the economy either.
Only a nationalist style government will solve the economic problems we have today because the whole aim of nationalism is supporting one's people. Not like our governments now whose aim is to sell us out to the highest bidder.
Hmm, well you seem to have the most vexing and destructive problem that faces humanity all sorted out and squared away, in a couple short paragraphs to boot! All the accumulated wisdom and mistakes paid in the blood of millions was all for naught, seeing as all we had to do was to wait for SGTGerman to come along and set us all strait via a few short lines of opinion guised as well reasoned FACT!
You sir, have convinced me, somehow, that violence does indeed work, and work well! How foolish was I to question the wisdom of the Gun.
I will overlook your sarcasm this time and say this - There is little point in us debating, as much as I like talking about subjects such as this. I am a Nationalist. I believe in a united nation with aims toi make the country the best it can be.
You on the otherhand are the compelte oppossite. "Everyman for himself". I do not doubt that this would be amazing, and peaceful but not suitable for this world.
Originally posted by Neo_Serf
Originally posted by SGTGerman
Originally posted by Neo_Serf
Originally posted by SGTGerman
reply to post by Neo_Serf
United we stand, divided we fall. Anarchy will never, ever reach the success a united nation will achieve. FACT. It wont help the economy either.
Only a nationalist style government will solve the economic problems we have today because the whole aim of nationalism is supporting one's people. Not like our governments now whose aim is to sell us out to the highest bidder.
Hmm, well you seem to have the most vexing and destructive problem that faces humanity all sorted out and squared away, in a couple short paragraphs to boot! All the accumulated wisdom and mistakes paid in the blood of millions was all for naught, seeing as all we had to do was to wait for SGTGerman to come along and set us all strait via a few short lines of opinion guised as well reasoned FACT!
You sir, have convinced me, somehow, that violence does indeed work, and work well! How foolish was I to question the wisdom of the Gun.
I will overlook your sarcasm this time and say this - There is little point in us debating, as much as I like talking about subjects such as this. I am a Nationalist. I believe in a united nation with aims toi make the country the best it can be.
You on the otherhand are the compelte oppossite. "Everyman for himself". I do not doubt that this would be amazing, and peaceful but not suitable for this world.
Indeed your world and mine are incompatible. You uphold the usage of force as legitimate, and I do not.
Despite the varied theories espoused by many establishment economists, it was none other than the Federal Reserve that caused the Great Depression and the horrific suffering, deprivation and dislocation America and the world experienced in its wake. At least, that's the clearly stated view of current Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke.
The worldwide economic downturn called the Great Depression, which persisted from 1929 until about 1939, was the longest and worst depression ever experienced by the industrialized Western world. While originating in the U.S., it ended up causing drastic declines in output, severe unemployment, and acute deflation in virtually every country on earth. According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, "the Great Depression ranks second only to the Civil War as the gravest crisis in American history."
What exactly caused this economic tsunami that devastated the U.S. and much of the world?
In "A Monetary History of the United States," Nobel Prize-winning economist Milton Friedman along with coauthor Anna J. Schwartz lay the mega-catastrophe of the Great Depression squarely at the feet of the Federal Reserve.