It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GenRadek
Originally posted by Yankee451
They needed to demolish the WTC which was a white elephant no one wanted to rent, and because of environmental issues, no one wanted to pay to repair.
Ah yes, it was an environmental issue. Thats why they took two large airliners and plowed them into the WTCs, and then had them collapse, spewing out tons and tons and tons of dust, burning materials, containing many many hazardous materials, which have been affecting first responders' health to this very day, and even killed some. Also the clean up of all that fine dust and powder which blanketed nearly all of southern Manhattan like a snow storm, or an ash cloud, causing resperatory illneses to those that breathed it in.
yes yes, it was very well planned out to be environmentally removed. I guess the old fashoned way of removing "hazardous" materials like asbestos from buildings was too much work. It worked out much better this way right?
Dont spit on my cupcake and call it sprinkles.