It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Ben81
hijacking an airplane with only little knifes
Originally posted by finalword
FDNY... the brainwashing is strong in this one...
Originally posted by finalword
Even if there was a collapse, it would have been a localized collapse. It would not have "pancaked" all the way down the entire building.
Originally posted by finalword
And if it was merely a collapse, why was all of the concrete in the towers pulverized into a fine dust? A collapse does not pulverize. At most the concrete would have broken into chunks.
Originally posted by finalword
Go get yourself a job at the CIA or something.
Originally posted by finalword
reply to post by Varemia
Pulverizing concrete requires significantly more energy than simply having it break into chunks.
911research.wtc7.net...
Originally posted by finalword
reply to post by FDNY343
Have you ever seen solid steel turn into liquid steel in your years of firefighting experience?
edit on 16-3-2011 by finalword because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by FDNY343
Originally posted by Ben81
hijacking an airplane with only little knifes
I'd like to see you defend yourself from box cutters (which, BTW, are incredibly sharp, and will slice a jugular vein easily) in a suprise attack, strapped into a seat facing the other direction, while trying to fly a plane.
Yeah, you wouldn't last 10 seconds.
Originally posted by FDNY343
Originally posted by Ben81
hijacking an airplane with only little knifes
I'd like to see you defend yourself from box cutters (which, BTW, are incredibly sharp, and will slice a jugular vein easily) in a suprise attack, strapped into a seat facing the other direction, while trying to fly a plane.
Yeah, you wouldn't last 10 seconds.
Bazant et al. have already shown that was not possible. The collapse, once began, could not have been stopped.
You do realize that concrete is relitively fragile compared to hundreds of tons of dynamic loads, right? BTW, here is some of your concrete chunks.
Originally posted by Yankee451
Originally posted by FDNY343
Originally posted by Ben81
hijacking an airplane with only little knifes
I'd like to see you defend yourself from box cutters (which, BTW, are incredibly sharp, and will slice a jugular vein easily) in a suprise attack, strapped into a seat facing the other direction, while trying to fly a plane.
Yeah, you wouldn't last 10 seconds.
What about a banana? Passion fruit? What about a pointed stick?
What would you do if you saw a few guys with box cutters who were going to kill you and the other passengers as far as you knew? Would you go take it like a sheep like all the military leathernecks did on 77 or would you brave the box cutters and go all let's roll on they asses like the civilians on 93?
Originally posted by finalword
reply to post by wmd_2008
Even if there was a collapse, it would have been a localized collapse. It would not have "pancaked" all the way down the entire building.
And if it was merely a collapse, why was all of the concrete in the towers pulverized into a fine dust? A collapse does not pulverize. At most the concrete would have broken into chunks.
Go get yourself a job at the CIA or something.
Originally posted by FDNY343
Originally posted by finalword
FDNY... the brainwashing is strong in this one...
No, the first-hand experience and years of firefighting knowledge is stong in this one.
My eyes don't lie to me. I saw the second impact with my own two eyes. They don't typically lie to me about something like that. Not to mention the thousands of other people that were around that said "Holy **** a plane just hit!!" I heard the jet, saw the jet, saw the explosion from the fuel, and felt the tremble. Sorry, CGI don't leave part strewn all about.
Originally posted by Yankee451
reply to post by Alfie1
Is that the point? Because my point is the story's a bunch of hogwash without any evidence to back it up.
Until there's a shred of evidence to support such tripe, it should be in the fiction section.
Originally posted by finalword
Things get repeated because there may be some truth behind it. Before or after is completely irrelevant. The fact that there was molten liquid of any kind should be suspicious.
911research.wtc7.net...
Originally posted by finalword
Well, one of the architects of the towers said that they could probably sustain multiple impacts from 707s.
Originally posted by Ben81omg .. that wasnt ur reply ... im blind by the madness of it
like a hundreds people in the plane would be scare of the little knife .. im sure many would sacrifice their life and go against the little box cutter
sorry this is just an IMPOSSIBLE SCENARIO