posted on Mar, 11 2011 @ 09:56 PM
WTC 7 was heavily compromised on the side that faced the WTC. The building was heavily damaged and fires burned out of control / uncontained the
entire time. WTC, being the command center for the City, had fuel on different floors as back up systems in case power was lost.
You coup[le all of that toogether, and you get a comrpomised building that will be coming down.
The 2 WTC buildings were heavily comprmosied by 2 aircraft travelling in excess of 500mph with heavy fuel loads. The floor design of the WTC building
are not standard, which is to say a technique was used where the outwer walls and inner square held the floors up. This was done to eliminate the need
for support columns , opening up more square footage for renting.
The design of the WTC took into account the possibility of an aircraft striking. The problem people have when invoking this porition is the design was
to take into account an airplane strike by a plane attempting to avoid the building.
NOT fly full speed into them...
The "explosions" you see on thes ide of the WTC occur from a downward pressure wave from the collapsing structure above it. Which also explains the
"exlposion" occuring on floors that are "intact" that are ahead of the collapse.
Make as much of an argument as you guys want, its your right to do so. This is not the first attack on the
WTC - that occured via truck bomb in 1993 under President CLinton. Its not the first time Al Queida attacked the US, this occured back in the late
80's early 1990's. 2 Embassies bombed on the African Continent, the attack on the USS Cole, all by al queida and all prior to President Bush comeing
The reason those are left out of arguments is because it undermines the argument to turn the wtc attakcs into a political tool by people who will go
to any means to ignore common sense and see what they want, while ginoring anything else that does not support their argument to lay blame on some
If you want to debate the WTC, then we can start a new thread, or pick up in an old one.
However, what occured in Japan has absolutely nothing to do with 9/11, and even attamepting to link to 2 dishonors the people whodied in both
Can we please show some respect for the dead by not using them as a political punching bag?