It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JIMC5499
reply to post by Ben81
The skyscrapers in Japan didn't have their structural integrity compromised by planes slamming in to them.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by FDNY343
Yes, I have seen this phenomenon once, and it was from a tanker fire under a bridge. Incredible fire. No, this was not the I-75 fire in Detroit, but simmilar.
Right, like I have any more reason to take your word for it than I do the plaque from the NYPD museum itself.
Thanks but I'd rather leave it to civilian professionals to analyze and decide.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Why outside NIST offices?
Originally posted by bsbray11
I don't control where protests are anyway. If you want to see 9/11 protests in general just go to YouTube and you'll find dozens. I don't guess they all think NIST was satisfactory regardless of them not being at NIST's offices. Of course you'll just ignore that and on to the next fallacy.
Originally posted by bsbray11
You can also find videos of congressmen and other leaders being confronted about 9/11 on YouTube. Just saying. I wouldn't know what mail they get anyway brother. Why didn't you think of that one?
Originally posted by Game_Over
--what is that saying about never doubting a small dedicated group of people making big changes in the world? Perhaps you should tell that to the scary brown guys who hijacked those planes.
Originally posted by Game_Over
--judging from the amount of time you spend posting on this matter and your screen name I highly doubt this is true.
Originally posted by Game_Over
--I am not interested why you brought it up. You brought it up and I illustrated how you were wrong. It is very simple. If you cannot wrap your head around the inherent conflict of interest in the 9-11 Commission Report and how this conflict would render the outcome questionable, just say so. I would be glad to discuss how not using proper codes of ethics in an investigation like this raises red flags.
Originally posted by SphinxMontreal
To draw a straight line to WTC is a huge stretch.......
I agree, this comparison is a huge stretch; a powerful earthquake can cause a lot more damage to a building than a couple of fake CGI created non-existent commercial airliners. I guess Japan does not have skyscrapers which are decrepit, hollow money pits filled with asbestos and controlled by a bunch of greedy criminal scam artists.
In addition, the Japanese Government knows that their people are not stupid enough to be bamboozled into giving up their freedoms and supporting two illegal unjust wars. And finally, the Japanese actually have a long standing culture where they actually show respect for their fellow human being. I think the Japanese have enough self-respect where they would not act inhumanely and provide the rest of the world with a genuine excuse to urinate all over them.
Originally posted by bsbray11Obviously I would like an independent investigation, but if you look at the post I was responding to, the poster was insinuating that the public who paid for the report was completely satisfied, which is obviously as false as to say no one is here arguing with you today.
Originally posted by Game_Over
--And why didn't they? All I here about is the fact that they were talking about its collapse ALL DAY. So why wouldn't they want to capture it? I won't get into the act that you are using a lack of evidence as evidence.
Originally posted by Yankee451
Why would any of them be fake?
Originally posted by wmd_2008
We already have had a thread put into the HOAX section a week our so ago that had this NO PLANE BS look at how many people posted videos/pictures on the net of the second impact and the fact it was on live TV so your suggestion is totally mad!!!!
Also I notice still no reply to my comment on your Newton v Nist video with its flawed physics!!!
On September 8, 2001, Wolfgang Staehle, a German-born Internet artist, set up two cameras in an apartment window in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, both pointed at the skyline of Lower Manhattan.
Originally posted by FDNY343
Originally posted by Yankee451
Why would any of them be fake?
Because you believe Phil Hayden, who cannot count to 343 properly, and because you said so!
Originally posted by Game_Over
--So it looked like it was scooped out or it was scooped out?
Originally posted by Game_Over
I understand it explains the direction it fell, that's why it is so important for you to accept it. But its not true.
Originally posted by Game_Over
They did not build the OEM and have all those tenants in an unsafe building.
Originally posted by Game_Over
The diesel generators did not contribute to the collapse.
Originally posted by Game_Over
The debris from WTC 1 and WTC 2 did not contribute to the collapse.
Originally posted by Game_Over
The fires did not contribute to the collapse.
Originally posted by Game_Over
They knew the building was coming down that day early on.
Originally posted by Game_Over
How did they know?
Originally posted by Game_Over
Because they were going to demolish it. I'll leave you to figure out how they did though.
Originally posted by Yankee451I've provided proof that the wings couldn't possibly cut steel.. You ignore that.