Super Moon Causes Super Quake and Tsunami!!

page: 2
7
<< 1   >>

log in

join

posted on Mar, 11 2011 @ 06:15 PM
link   
reply to post by SunTzu22
 


Quoted from OP article:


Astrologists point to history to validate their predictions, says Ben Yakas at Gothamist. Both the New England hurricane of 1938 and the Australian Hunter Valley floods of 1955 happened during Super Moons, they say. The last Super Moon came in 2005, at around the same time as Hurricane Katrina and the Indonesian tsunami.


What about the millions and millions of storms, earthquakes and other floods that have happened when there was no supermoon? How did all of them happen?




posted on Mar, 11 2011 @ 06:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by boncho
reply to post by SunTzu22
 




Go retake 8th grade science if you can't put two and two together.


Can you provide the 8th grade science textbook that states the Moon's perigee causes earthquakes?

Or did you confuse tectonic activity with tidal force?


The moons increased gravity, will have an increased pul,l on EVERYTHING. That includes sub-terrainian liquids, like MAGMA.

And that new energy factor could result in favorable conditions for tectonic plates to release previously stored energy, I.E.....AN EARTHQUAKE! Do you know how much energy is used to pull the oceans around all day???

Did you ever stop to realize that the moon has the same effect on ALL massive bodies of fluid??

Damn public schools......



posted on Mar, 11 2011 @ 06:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by SunTzu22

Originally posted by boncho
reply to post by SunTzu22
 




Go retake 8th grade science if you can't put two and two together.


Can you provide the 8th grade science textbook that states the Moon's perigee causes earthquakes?

Or did you confuse tectonic activity with tidal force?


The moons increased gravity, will have an increased pul,l on EVERYTHING. That includes sub-terrainian liquids, like MAGMA.

And that new energy factor could result in favorable conditions for tectonic plates to release previously stored energy, I.E.....AN EARTHQUAKE! Do you know how much energy is used to pull the oceans around all day???

Did you ever stop to realize that the moon has the same effect on ALL massive bodies of fluid??

Damn public schools......


Please, show us your equations of this phenomena seeing as we are so unenlightened. As are the geologists and astonomers that I have been reading.



posted on Mar, 11 2011 @ 06:30 PM
link   
reply to post by boncho
 


Here, some expert input for you those that are slow of thought.


vulcan.wr.usgs.gov...



posted on Mar, 11 2011 @ 06:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by SunTzu22

Originally posted by boncho
reply to post by SunTzu22
 




Go retake 8th grade science if you can't put two and two together.


Can you provide the 8th grade science textbook that states the Moon's perigee causes earthquakes?

Or did you confuse tectonic activity with tidal force?


The moons increased gravity, will have an increased pul,l on EVERYTHING. That includes sub-terrainian liquids, like MAGMA.

And that new energy factor could result in favorable conditions for tectonic plates to release previously stored energy, I.E.....AN EARTHQUAKE! Do you know how much energy is used to pull the oceans around all day???

Did you ever stop to realize that the moon has the same effect on ALL massive bodies of fluid??

Damn public schools......



Right on , it even have a pull on the water in our bodys



posted on Mar, 11 2011 @ 06:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by SunTzu22
reply to post by boncho
 


Here, some expert input for you those that are slow of thought.


vulcan.wr.usgs.gov...


Nowhere in that article do they claim that the moon causes earthquakes.

I fail to see your point.



posted on Mar, 11 2011 @ 06:45 PM
link   
reply to post by boncho
 


Then you should take the bag off ur head.



posted on Mar, 11 2011 @ 06:47 PM
link   
reply to post by Chadwickus
 





The distance of the moon from earth on March 19 2001 will be: 356758km away.


My question to the OP is: If on March 19th [the date of the actual supermoon]... if there are no earthquakes or anything else on that date according to the logic used so far, does that mean supermoons cause no effect?

Or do they only cause effect when you choose them to? As the poster that I am quoting said, it isn't even the supermoon yet. The idea is void.



posted on Mar, 11 2011 @ 06:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by SunTzu22
reply to post by boncho
 


Then you should take the bag off ur head.


The following was quoted from your article. Either you are delusional or you have a comprehension problem.


Scientists have found no correlation between the tides and earthquakes.


Earthquakes + Moon = No correlation.



posted on Mar, 11 2011 @ 06:53 PM
link   
reply to post by boncho
 


The moon does not have to be at its scientificly closest point for it increased pull to have an effect. And you should know by now what kind of force is being exerted on the crust, from the magma below. Duh.

I usually charge for tutoring, time is money as they say. For you I will go pro bono.

And ur head is that which is void, not my idea.

Cheers!



posted on Mar, 11 2011 @ 06:54 PM
link   
reply to post by boncho
 


Thats in the context of oceans, and you knew that. No more trolling shill.



posted on Mar, 11 2011 @ 06:56 PM
link   
reply to post by boncho
 


Again, pro bono.

news.nationalgeographic.com...

Ur welcome.



posted on Mar, 11 2011 @ 07:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by SunTzu22
reply to post by boncho
 


The moon does not have to be at its scientificly closest point for it increased pull to have an effect. And you should know by now what kind of force is being exerted on the crust, from the magma below. Duh.

I usually charge for tutoring, time is money as they say. For you I will go pro bono.

And ur head is that which is void, not my idea.

Cheers!


Last time I checked the title of this thread is: Super Moon Causes Super Quake and Tsunami!!

Supermoon refers to when the moon is closest to to the earth and in full view, right?



posted on Mar, 11 2011 @ 07:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by SunTzu22
reply to post by boncho
 


Again, pro bono.

news.nationalgeographic.com...

Ur welcome.


Do you read the articles you link me to or just the titles?



"There's no evidence to support that," said John Bellini, a geophysicist with the survey's National Earthquake Information Center in Golden, Colorado. "There were some studies in the past that tried to link lunar effects to seismicity [the relative frequency and distribution of earthquakes] and there was nothing found."



posted on Mar, 11 2011 @ 07:22 PM
link   
Before you link me to another dozen articles that you haven't read, just let me opt out of this thread now to save me the trouble of having to go through them all. I already played this game with other ATSers and I'm losing patience.



posted on Mar, 20 2011 @ 01:33 AM
link   
Make your mind up mate!

It was either the supermoon (even though it was outside the timeperiod for possible influence) or it was a nuclear attack by the US - come on man, which was it, I am dying to know the truth.





top topics
 
7
<< 1   >>

log in

join