Oh no, Yellowstone May have been awakened by the 8.8, page 9


Pages: <<  6    7    8    9    10    11    12  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 212 times


reply posted on 11-3-2011 @ 06:27 AM by star child
reply to post by theabsolutetruth


Go away and leave the the OP alone. l suggest you you get a cold glass of water an pour it on your Ego.
Peace star.


reply posted on 11-3-2011 @ 06:29 AM by westcoast
reply to post by theabsolutetruth



None of those threads were started by the OP.

The last two of mine were not fear mongering. In fact, It was later confirmed (the next day, PNSN was a little behind me) that there WAS in fact a SWARM at Mount Saint Helens.

Glacier Peak was never explained, and I am still watching it.

Those have nothing to do with fear mongerin, but about keeping informed. Thanks for linking them in case anyone here wants to learn a little more about the Pacific Northwest.

Can we keep this on topic? If you take such offense, then send a message to Admin and let them decide.

We are simply monitoring the park to see if this develops into a new swarm. The fact that it may have been triggered is why it warrants its own thread.

Still nothing listed on USGS so this at least means that there hasn't been anything magnetude 2.5 or above. That is at least something positive. Ugh, I was going to say there weren't any quakes on the screen...but here comes another.


reply posted on 11-3-2011 @ 06:33 AM by zenius
reply to post by theabsolutetruth



Well you educate us on what the seismos are doing please since you know more than any one else here. Give us all a lesson.

And regarding the other threads, it is not fearmongering, it is people noticing things...people who watch these things all the time, who think something is amiss. The threads alert others who all pull together to try to figure out what the anomaly means.

What makes the links that you have provided any more up to date or concise than any others? Please tell us how you are the expert in this field.


reply posted on 11-3-2011 @ 06:38 AM by crimvelvet
reply to post by juggalo77





hi sorry if i seem ignorant but what will happen if yellowstone is affected??? what exactly would that do??? thanks in advance


VERY LARGE SUPER VOLCANO

Yellow stone observatory: volcanoes.usgs.gov...

National Geographic: Jan 19, 2011
Yellowstone Has Bulged as Magma Pocket Swells

Yellowstone National Park's supervolcano just took a deep "breath," causing miles of ground to rise dramatically, scientists report.

The simmering volcano has produced major eruptions—each a thousand times more powerful than Mount St. Helens's 1980 eruption—three times in the past 2.1 million years. Yellowstone's caldera, which covers a 25- by 37-mile (40- by 60-kilometer) swath of Wyoming, is an ancient crater formed after the last big blast, some 640,000 years ago.

(See "When Yellowstone Explodes" in National Geographic magazine.)

Since then, about 30 smaller eruptions—including one as recent as 70,000 years ago—have filled the caldera with lava and ash, producing the relatively flat landscape we see today.

But beginning in 2004, scientists saw the ground above the caldera rise upward at rates as high as 2.8 inches (7 centimeters) a year. (Related: "Yellowstone Is Rising on Swollen 'Supervolcano.'")

The rate slowed between 2007 and 2010 to a centimeter a year or less. Still, since the start of the swelling, ground levels over the volcano have been raised by as much as 10 inches (25 centimeters) in places.

"It's an extraordinary uplift, because it covers such a large area and the rates are so high," said the University of Utah's Bob Smith, a longtime expert in Yellowstone's volcanism...



reply posted on 11-3-2011 @ 06:45 AM by kalenga
Started a thread a while back on the effects of Yellowstone erupting. Didn't get much interest so here it is again:

www.unmuseum.org...



Another catastrophic eruption is also possible. The effects of such a disaster are hard to even comprehend. Bill McGuire, professor of geohazards at the Benfield Greig Hazard Research Centre at the University College of London told the UK Daily Express, "Magma would be flung 50 kilometers into the atmosphere. Within a thousand kilometers virtually all life would be killed by falling ash, lava flows and the sheer explosive force of the eruption. One thousand cubic kilometers of lava would pour out of the volcano, enough to coat the whole USA with a layer 5 inches thick." He adds that it would once again bring "the bitter cold of Volcanic Winter to Planet Earth. Mankind may become extinct."



reply posted on 11-3-2011 @ 06:53 AM by lordtyp0
reply to post by TrueAmerican



Thats part of it: You did not post anything to show what was going on till multiple people asked for it, then you posted screenshots without mentioning what they were from or related to-service wise-when they were in fact posted you regarded people asking for specifics as if they were the ones being unreasonable..

So far it looks like everything has stabilized-at least as much as that general area does

And yeah, trolls tend to be overly dramatic, with that in mind I would hope it can be seen why people thought that-regardless of actual merit of intent.
edit on 11-3-2011 by lordtyp0 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 11-3-2011 @ 07:03 AM by lordtyp0
reply to post by TrueAmerican



Nothing to do with being superhuman. Everything to do with saying things like:

Yeah, here is your fricken citation:


Civility and preparation in ones thread can go a long way to showing one is not a troll and interested in more than flag and star farming.

Edit to add:
Meh, didn't come on to lecture.
I thought it interesting that California and Alaska had a couple blurps on the tremer side around the same time as well. But thats neither here nor there I suppose.
edit on 11-3-2011 by lordtyp0 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 11-3-2011 @ 07:04 AM by shadowland8
reply to post by lordtyp0



I dunno, people deal with stress in different ways I guess.

It's not too hard to get all caught up in it.


reply posted on 11-3-2011 @ 07:15 AM by lordtyp0
reply to post by PeasantRebellion





Here are a couple tools that will allow watching directly-if you dont want to install an App anyway.

YS Quake info

Well one, I lost the links, will get more and edit, though Im sure TA has a lot more readily available links.



EDIT:
from Feb of last year This is to show how normal this kind of activity is. This sampling is from February of last year-in this case after a repotred swarm of mini quakes I think by a month.
edit on 11-3-2011 by lordtyp0 because: (no reason given)
edit on 11-3-2011 by lordtyp0 because: (no reason given)



EDIT
Looks like they have confirmed EQ data, 3 of them all sub 3 on the RS.
Quake data
edit on 11-3-2011 by lordtyp0 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 11-3-2011 @ 07:17 AM by PeasantRebellion
Originally posted by lordtyp0
reply to
post by PeasantRebellion





Here are a couple tools that will allow watching directly-if you dont want to install an App anyway.

YS Quake info

Well one, I lost the links, will get more and edit, though Im sure TA has a lot more readily available links.



Awesome! Thank you so much. Haven't had time to make that underground bunker I've been dreaming of because just moved to this new place in January.


reply posted on 11-3-2011 @ 07:28 AM by lordtyp0
reply to post by TrueAmerican



As for the increased activity. It actually looks a lot less than the same time frame last year.
3 quakes today all barely noticeable. Histories look fairly similar going back to the quake swarms anyway.
Pages: <<  6    7    8    9    10    11    12  >>    ^^TOP^^



California going off!
  Posted 16 days ago with 146 member flags
Ice Age Flower Blooms After 32000 Years!
  Posted 15 days ago with 79 member flags
Experts Warn Mount Fuji is Dangerously Close to Erupting
  Posted 5 days ago with 66 member flags
Man building his own island out of plastic bottles
  Posted 12 days ago with 59 member flags
Simple way to discover if your produce is GMO.
  Posted 2 days ago with 46 member flags