It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jackieisinlove
reply to post by eNumbra
The issue isn't whether or not the quiz is relevant to a psychology class. I also think that indirectly calling me small-minded and making the assumption that I "have no wish to understand why we are who we are" was a little uncalled for.
The issue here is whether this quiz was appropriate for children. Or, rather, whether it was appropriate for an adult to give the quiz to children. Or, even further, whether it was appropriate for an adult teacher to give the quiz to children in a school setting. And Lemon.Fresh, AP or not, they are still minors. I was reading The Grapes of Wrath at the age of six. Does that mean I was ready to date an adult? My point being that just because you're intellectually at a certain point doesn't make you emotionally on the same level. Teenagers are even younger emotionally than they are biologically, in my opinion, and it's gross for an adult to be speaking to them this way, through a quiz or not.
A lot of very young kids are being taught what sex is. I took sex ed in sixth grade, but I knew what sex was years before then. Does that mean that third graders should be given the quiz because if they understand the innuendos they've already been exposed to sex anyway? I'm guessing there are no parents in this thread.
Originally posted by pforkp
These questions are taken directly from the game "Dirty Minds" - they are obviously meant to have sexual innuendo, and the answers are logical (and hilariously surprising if you have a "dirty mind"). This said, it does come across as a bit explicit - but frankly, it's nothing these kids haven't heard or talked about before. The parents need to get a clue - their child is most likely not the innocent, pure little angel that they think, especially at that age.
So I think the kids, rather than the parents, should have the say on whether it offends them or not. Treat your kids with a bit more maturity - you're smothering them with misguided values.
Originally posted by eNumbra
reply to post by Visitor2012
And that would be the point. Anybody who is already exposed to the ideas will put those ideas into the questions.
Also, what do you mean "you people"?
Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
Britney Separs, Ke$ha, Nicki Minaj, Lady Gaga and Beyonce videos are way more suggestive and explicit yet parents have absolutely zero complaints about them. Until parents take more charge over the media that their kids are exposed I will consider taking them seriously until then no.
Originally posted by Visitor2012
Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
Britney Separs, Ke$ha, Nicki Minaj, Lady Gaga and Beyonce videos are way more suggestive and explicit yet parents have absolutely zero complaints about them. Until parents take more charge over the media that their kids are exposed I will consider taking them seriously until then no.
Are those videos being shown in classrooms?
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
reply to post by SonOfTheLawOfOne
I'd say give the teacher a raise. it's a psychology class, and testing one's own perceptions is pretty damned standard.
The parents need to grow the hell up, frankly. Either that or start wearing belt buckles on their heads so the rest of us can see what stodgy puritans they are, and mock accordingly
Originally posted by Visitor2012
reply to post by TheImmaculateD1
So a parent has no right to stand up against sexually inappropriate educational material, because they, according to you, haven't properly stood up to the sexually inappropriate musical industry first? Therefore, rendering them hypocrites unworthy of deciding what is appropriate for their children's education?
Come on, please tell me you're joking or that you didn't thoroughly think your response through.
Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
Originally posted by Visitor2012
reply to post by TheImmaculateD1
So a parent has no right to stand up against sexually inappropriate educational material, because they, according to you, haven't properly stood up to the sexually inappropriate musical industry first? Therefore, rendering them hypocrites unworthy of deciding what is appropriate for their children's education?
Come on, please tell me you're joking or that you didn't thoroughly think your response through.
This has everything to do with parents keeping their kids sheltered from everything and when the item they should've been prepared for happens whereas they weren't prepared for it they want to cry foul.
Parents also do not want to teach their kid anything which will lead t problems.
Parents of those who endorse openess is less likely to be a drug addict, alcoholic and be sexually promiscious as the kids are taught that they won't get demonized nor attacked for bringing an item up.
I had simply said to protest the entertainment industry before you protest a part of a schools ciriculum.