posted on Mar, 10 2011 @ 06:06 PM
If the flight deck door according to official data retrieved was 'closed" then we have two very real possible scenarios that happened.
1- The door was never opened because the Pilot/hijacker was already in the cockpit.
2- The hijack never happened. At least as the OS states.
FLT DECK DOOR - As retrieved from the Flight Data Recorder (FDR) allegedly found inside the Pentagon shortly after the event happened. Allegedly from
AA Flight 77 which was reported to have struck the Pentagon.
The information is updated every 4 seconds while the aircraft is in flight, not once did it ever record an open cockpit door. There have been many
attempts at throwing people off by some in this forum who say that the "FLT DECK DOOR isn't the "cockpit door", in reality there is no difference
between the two. To access the cockpit door one must go thru the flight deck door.
- istock and Media Partners
As seen above, the cockpit door/ flight deck door is one and the same despite the constant dis-information of a certain few.
When the switch to this door is in the "Open" position the door can opened from either side without having to use a key. When this switch is in the
"Normal" position the lock is energized and cannot be opened without a key.
With the NTSB data clearly stating that this perimeter shown on flight 77 was for the FDD was locked and never opened then we have a much bigger
problem than the hand wavers would like to imagine. It don't matter who in this website is an ex Pilot or a current one, what does matter (a great
deal) is what went on that day and why this data has never been proven to be otherwise. There have been no evidence to further show that this event in
this data was due to flawed circuit, rely or otherwise. None at all has ever been presented and the media has all but put this little tidbit of
information in the memory banks hoping that it will never see the light of day again. But this remains a very important piece of the puzzle that
cannot be forgotten or dismissed.
If the Pilots were part of the hijacking crew then this would be a highly plausible reason that it was never addressed in the scruitny of the media
nor the public as this and most other problems with the OS is concerned. If the hijackers were indeed already in the cockpit or the pilots were
complicit then this would be an issue for the public confidence and probably not want to be brought into the public domain for consideration by the
airlines and the government. Witht the data saying the door was never opened then this is a major problem. The Pilot of flight 77, Charles Burlingame
had participated in military excersises according to his military records as well as the Pentagon briefing archives. This is a partciular problem due
to the war excersises dealt with an aircraft striking the Pentagon. And now we have a polled data for the cockpit never having been opened as well as
Burlingame being the Pilot. Sound odd? Coincidence at best and complicitness at worst. Regardless of how much emotions for some may come into play
here, 911 is full of unanswered problems with the explanation given to the world by the US Government and its well past due that the tough questions
be put forward. This is another one of them.
Here we have an experienced navy Fighter Pilot who had worked at the Pentagon, a Lockheed martin consultant on top projects and worked for AA, so we
aren't talking about some out of college type who just landed a flying gig at a commercial airlines. This man was experienced, in the circle so to
speak and knew the routine.
In my opinion adding insult to injury here in this event is the fact that no one was able to enable the emergency code transponder or make an
emergency call. With all of this experience in the cockpit one of the two should have been done as that would have been a priority in that situation.
Given the fact the door was never opened according to the data provided by the NTSB it IS suspicious. And it places the Pilots in the suspect chair or
tells us they were deceased well before this aircraft took off or soon thereafter. No one can simply say "it was broke/or an error" and leave it at
that because that does not provide an answer here. We already know it wasn't "broke" nor were there any errors in the system that day prior to the
crash. So, what was it then?
One problem I have with the answer of, "it was broke" or "it was an error" is that this is the only error in the system that day and to add that
there is no evidence, statement to that affect by any agency that the pollings within that airliner's system were indeed "broke" or "an error" so
once again, we have an issue here that cannot be chalked up to a hand waving answer within the context of putting down conpsiracy theorys about 911,
then be expected to move on. There is a reason as to why this door was never opened during the flight. I believe it rests within one of the two
possible explanations as cited above.
Now for the second scenario I gave being the hijack never happened (at least as the OS states) I lean towards the probability that an aircraft did
crash into the Pentagon however, i am not one hundred % sure it was an airliner. Why? Well, if it were and according to George Bush, "Lets never
tolerate conspiracy theorys" then I must say without hesitation, lets not tolerate the evidence being kept secret from the citizens who were
attacked by politicans. And with that said, where is this massive amount of evidence that shows an airliner crashing into the Pentagon? There were
three cameras that day inw hich according to the FBI were in full working condition and showed the attack without hinderance. OK, where's is at then?
This government wants to be intolerate of conspiracy theorys, then show the proof of what you claim then. Stop going around telling people what you
would like them to think and show the proof. I believe they do not have any to show and this why none has been shown to this day. We all saw the
footage from Waco, we saw the photos from Ruby Ridge, we saw the photos from JFK's autopsy and we see all of the time, photos in any number of court
cases for murders, robberys, vehicle chases so why not the biggest terrorist attack in the world then?
Simple, the US government has and continues to lie and they do not have any photos nor video to prove what they claim happened on 911. The Amercians
and other citizens of various nationalitys died on September 11, 2001 for the sole purpose so that George Bush and his band of crooks could invade a
small country to keep the oil fields flowing in the favor of the US and it's allies under the lies (as we all know them to be now) that Iraq had
WMDs. The same failure to follow up on the case of the unopened flight deck door is the same attitude that allowed the US population to be pulled
under a blanket of lies and deciept so that business attired criminals could keep sucking the money and blood out of those who pay for their antics
that involve war, lies and oil all the while making a mockery & joke out of those of us who seek the truth in order to re-establish the trust that
this great nation was built upon.
One day. Some way. The truth about 9/11 will prevail as the truth has a tendency to always do. No matter the darkest cloak of evil and no matter the
biggest lie, the truth will one day come out.