I agree with the OP that there is a whole lot of slavery going on today, that most still don't recognize as such. Working for slave wages, adhering
to beliefs that keep our minds captive, making excuses for not taking personal responsibility, etc.
But I don't think the Cathars / Albigensians are much to look up to. They really did threaten the world order of the time, and they would do so
today.
...Roman Church which considered the feudal system to be divinely ordained as the natural order (Cathars disliked it because it depended on oath
taking).
Well, our word is in fact important. In politics, in commerce, in our own families, the concept of an "oath" can't get too far from us without
consequences.
Maybe that was the main reason they were wiped out, although their absurd dualism was certainly asking for trouble too, especially back in those
days.
While reading about the Cathars in this thread makes them sound like enlightened proto-new-age-protestants, ahead of their time, the reality, as far
as I know, was quite different.
This essentially Gnostic sect believed that there was a good god, and a bad one, and that all material was intrinsically evil. Which led to
ridiculous things such as encouraging suicide, the promotion of homosexuality, the virtual impossibility of a realistic continuation of the familial
basic unit, etc. It wasn't just about recognizing women as equals, or being vegetarian!
Sure, it appealed to lots of people, but I have to wonder how many were attracted for noble reasons, when they were more or less an early version of
"Free Love" (think late '60's and '70's). At that time, it must have been seen as the justification for the huge sex party everyone always
wanted. Perhaps if the Catholics hadn't done what they did, something like AIDS would have come along shortly and rained on their parade, who
knows.
I'm not a religionist myself, the Catholics had plenty of issues too obviously, but to idealize the Cathars seems silly. This was a group that
almost could never survive anyway, just based on the fact that they abhorred procreation, almost as much as they loved (non-procreative) sex.
Hmmm. Sort of sounds rather modern come to think of it!
JR