It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Hacker group vows 'cyberwar' on US government, business

page: 2
2
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 10 2011 @ 11:08 AM
link   
He might be a honeypot waiting. (He's Winnie the Pooh!)

I'd be careful with the [snip]

Best way to get at him would probably be his already online public info....aka legally.




Mod Edit: Profanity/Circumvention Of Censors – Please Review This Link.


edit on 10/3/11 by argentus because: (no reason given)




posted on Mar, 10 2011 @ 11:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by aivlas
reply to post by Expunged
 


I've made my own decision see the other thread and where is leader coming from?


There is no leader, don't you get it? Visit the URL I provided above. Your continued ignorance will be ignored.



posted on Mar, 10 2011 @ 11:13 AM
link   
reply to post by Expunged
 


Right but what has that got to do with the story? he never said he was a leader.



posted on Mar, 10 2011 @ 11:13 AM
link   

Originally posted by hadriana
He might be a honeypot waiting. (He's Winnie the Pooh!)

Best way to get at him would probably be his already online public info....aka legally.


This site isn't as secure as you think.
edit on 10-3-2011 by Expunged because: Ponies



posted on Mar, 10 2011 @ 11:15 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Mar, 10 2011 @ 11:21 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Mar, 10 2011 @ 11:27 AM
link   
reply to post by Expunged
 


Underage people interested in computer security will know exactly what I mean.
My statement was urging caution in attacking Barrett and suggesting it be done legally.

Why would you threaten me over THAT?



posted on Mar, 10 2011 @ 11:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by hadriana
reply to post by Expunged
 


Underage people interested in computer security will know exactly what I mean.
My statement was urging caution in attacking Barrett and suggesting it be done legally.

Why would you threaten me over THAT?


I didn't threaten you. That would be abhorrent! Sacrilege!

Pesky remote DB connections - always getting in the way of RL.

I'm going to bed.



posted on Mar, 10 2011 @ 11:37 AM
link   
The thread topic is: Hacker group vows 'cyberwar' on US government, business

Please adhere to the topic and avoid discussing one another.


Thank you,

Hefficide
ATS Member and moderator.



posted on Mar, 10 2011 @ 11:42 AM
link   
How many "hackers" have tried to seek war on our Gov. my guess is at least a million, it's funny this topic got so big, do these guys seriously think that the Gov. doesn't have computer savvy individuals on their side? it'll be fun to watch the outcome of this so called "cyberwar."

I estimate it will be done with in one month, haha



posted on Mar, 10 2011 @ 11:51 AM
link   
The thread is a dupe that provides no new info than the other one, it would seem that modding individual posts is pointless.
edit on 10-3-2011 by aivlas because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 10 2011 @ 01:11 PM
link   
reply to post by EL1A5
 

There will be no such cyberwar. This guy doesn't have Anon's backing.
Second line



posted on Mar, 10 2011 @ 01:33 PM
link   
reply to post by John_Rodger_Cornman
 


If you say trust no one you nut job why the hell should I trust you?



posted on Mar, 10 2011 @ 01:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by DuceizBack
reply to post by John_Rodger_Cornman
 


If you say trust no one you nut job why the hell should I trust you?


You can. But you don't have to.

You can trust anyone(including Megacorp news, government sources etc) or choice not to.

But for the most part. Trust no one unless what they say/show is proven with your own eyes personally.



posted on Mar, 10 2011 @ 07:51 PM
link   

A leader of the computer hackers group known as Anonymous


"Barrett Brown, 29, who calls himself a senior strategist and 'propagandist' for Anonymous."

Those two statements sound like quite a stretch.


edit on 2011-3-10 by EnhancedInterrogator because: fixed formatting.
extra DIV



posted on Mar, 10 2011 @ 08:03 PM
link   
reply to post by HardbeatAcolyte
 


There may not be no cyberwar from the real anon but there will be a cyberwar from the fake anon.Thats the danger of being anon anybody cab be anon including false flaggers,anon has been compromised there is no more anon its done.

Anon will be no more as you have been infiltrated by agent provocatuers and will be fractured because of it,dont know how you'll clean it up anon but anon is no longer anon. Stay frosty.



posted on Mar, 11 2011 @ 09:35 AM
link   
reply to post by EnhancedInterrogator
 


Why have loads of you latched on to the person who wrote the article calling him a leader are you all that dense (sorry but it has to be said) and surely anyone who helps with choosing targets etc is a strategist. Now if you all go and do some reading you will notice the same names again and again in this latest anon action.

ATS nice work blocking my ip




top topics



 
2
<< 1   >>

log in

join