It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Probably because "billionaires on Wall Street" actually contribute to society and pay billions into the tax system.
Public sector unions, on the other hand, are some of the largest leeches on society
You'll be hard-pressed to find a billionaire on Wall Street that didn't break their back to get to their position. Many come from very humble beginnings.
I argue that the average public sector union worker is greedier than the average Wall Street billionaire. At least the billionaires earn their money and contribute to the tax base.
You'll also be hard-pressed to find someone in a public sector union that didn't take the job to collect a pension, have every conceivable holiday off and accumulate 4 weeks paid vacation a year.
Originally posted by EssenceOfSilence
reply to post by Southern Guardian
If these steps don't work and you want to go back to the way it was, vote them out in 2012/14 and elect some folks that will reinstate it.
If you don't like the process you will need to move to a socialist nation,
Originally posted by MMPI2
I say to this: GOOD! Kudos for the bravery of the wisconsin voter for finally reigning in the corruption rampant in the union ranks.
what needs to happen next is subpoenas, indictments, arraignments, grand juries, and convictions.
anybody within the unions' leaderships needs to be investigated and convicted for racketeering.
I don't know what planet your from but in Michigan employers can fire you for anything they want just short of color of skin.
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
reply to post by David9176
I wonder what will happen when Wisconsin and other states continue to suffer budgetary issues following these cuts to the middleclass? Whats next? We going to remove minimum wage outright? How about giving employers every right to fire somebody when they want for whatever reason? Yep, I can see the future, and it's just more cuts to the middle class.
The consequences will come out soon.edit on 10-3-2011 by Southern Guardian because: (no reason given)
Yet election after election, the American sheep keep voting corrupt politicians in. Who is truly at fault? The American people are, and I will rejoice when they finally begin to suffer the consequences of electing criminals.
Without the unions there won't be as many construction workers and such,
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
Originally posted by EssenceOfSilence
reply to post by Southern Guardian
If these steps don't work and you want to go back to the way it was, vote them out in 2012/14 and elect some folks that will reinstate it.
Bush was voted in twice, remember?
I shouldn't be laughing at this really, but then again its the only thing I can do, laugh at how easily fooled we are. And no I am not so much concerned at the fact these people were voted in for their policies as I am at the ignorance regarding the result of these policies. If you voted for Scott Walker and others, ok, you feel he is the right guy for the job, but if he implements a policy that does more harm to this economy and working folks and you ignore this, that is when I have issue.
If you don't like the process you will need to move to a socialist nation,
If you going to throw around the socialist tag, I suggest you throw it back to Walker since our taxes pay for his healthcare, and the fact more than 40 million elderly americans take our taxes for healthcare as well.
...and by the way, socialist countries are surviving much better than we are.
Originally posted by David9176
There is NO CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT prohibiting CHILD LABOR under any circumstances. There is an amendment but it was never ratified....one of six.
(Correct me if I'm wrong please)
Do you all take the stern stance that based on the Constitution that it is ok for businesses to hire children for any job under any circumstance?
I make this argument for those who keep using the Constitution to defend corporations....edit on 10-3-2011 by David9176 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by EssenceOfSilence
My point is we have a constitution that will work for the people if the people are willing to follow it and more importantly get back to it.
Socialism is a form of government that has failed time and time again
Originally posted by David9176
There is NO CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT prohibiting CHILD LABOR under any circumstances. There is an amendment but it was never ratified....one of six.
(Correct me if I'm wrong please)
Do you all take the stern stance that based on the Constitution that it is ok for businesses to hire children for any job under any circumstance?
I make this argument for those who keep using the Constitution to defend corporations....edit on 10-3-2011 by David9176 because: (no reason given)