It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Nuclear threat to US city

page: 4
0
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 24 2004 @ 04:24 PM
link   
You are correct Ranger, I, not being a crypto genius just posted the info so everyone knows that it is there, I find it iffy myself but for posterity and future dealings with the one or one's called EOM, I thought it was worth posting.




posted on Jul, 24 2004 @ 04:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by JacKatMtn
You are correct Ranger, I, not being a crypto genius just posted the info so everyone knows that it is there, I find it iffy myself but for posterity and future dealings with the one or one's called EOM, I thought it was worth posting.


Well thanks for finding it anyway.

By the way, the original 9/10 posting by EOM can be found here.



posted on Jul, 24 2004 @ 04:39 PM
link   
Crap!

Jack, you left out some of EOM's post! I just now took the ime to look at it, and before the code is this:

-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: N/A

I was barking up the wrong tree.
I don't know if I can do anything with it now, but I'll poke around.

EDIT: FYI, PGP stands for Pretty Good Privacy. Whole different way of encrypting things.

ranger... the response from Khodja is bogus, somebody shining him on. In his pgp you can see the joke.



begin PGP message:

as;lkdfja'eaidjgakewi5u238957r843'24358padgfndkjfa;fjj;l222He'sdeadJim3458q90ufa dkjfa;sdklfjcq;lwkejrqw43o85893471(*^)*&%^UHi;ritwertjFReepersrulekjfl;asdfj
874293084
NVWIOEJR;ODK390-9879084539Gooblygook(*&)*(3;2ij;welkut9g erjtodfiaposdfqwertyqwertyqwerty

end pgp


[edit on 7/24/2004 by phreak_of_nature]

[edit on 26-7-2006 by DontTreadOnMe]



posted on Jul, 24 2004 @ 04:49 PM
link   
Hehe, yeah it did sound like a bit of a jibe.


[edit on 24-7-2004 by rangeroftheeast]



posted on Jul, 25 2004 @ 10:44 PM
link   
Some reports on short-wave radio suggest there may be as many as 20 10kt nukes already on US soil and pre-positioned for use.

Anyone have any colllaborative information on these reports?



posted on Jul, 26 2004 @ 08:38 AM
link   

Originally posted by wolfpsy
Some reports on short-wave radio suggest there may be as many as 20 10kt nukes already on US soil and pre-positioned for use.

Anyone have any colllaborative information on these reports?


Those stories have been going round and round since just after 9/11. The thing is, is Bin Laden has multiple nuclear weapons inside the US, I kinda think that he might just have used them by now. The only rational explanation would be if the weapons were inside the US, but were not fully operational. They might be missing a triggering device, or a code or something....but its all just speculation. There are all kinda of stories, but no real hard evidence.

[edit on 26-7-2004 by rangeroftheeast]



posted on Jul, 27 2004 @ 09:09 AM
link   
This CNN story, some are linking to a underwater nuclear explosion off of the Cape Cod coast, saying that the dead whales drifted from across the Atlantic.



posted on Jul, 28 2004 @ 01:30 AM
link   
Certantly IF terorists had a nuclear bomb (not just a dirty bomb)
then there is no reason to not use it as soon as you could.

The terror and resulting destruction would be the same...and if your only goal is to cause terror and devastation, then use it asap....

If your going to use it as leverage for say extortion or other "comply or be nuked" scenarios...then youd have to have already used a device to demonstrate your both capable and ready. (thus needing at least 2 nukes)
Thus, if you had 2 nukes and wanted to use one as a deterrant, youd still have to use one so why not just get it over with, so that you can get right to the extortion.

A city will vaporize as SOON as a terrorist can possibly get one into position. This is why nations are fearful of WMD proliferation, because they realize that the WMD will be used at the earliest possible time....there is NO reason for a terrorist to not usethem unless it is as a bargining/deterrrance tool. Otherwise your holding onto a serious liabillity carrying around and trying to hide a WMD. The cost involved in getting a device, and training and keeping your activities secret would not be worth going thru unless you intend to strike with the weapon...

A country has its border, and "clout" of being a soverign nation to help protect it, but terrorists having no such abilities would have no "target" to occupy if they use a WMD...another reason terrorists would do this before any rouge state would.

We cant wait till someplace becomes +10,000 degrees in a flash to take actions to prevent this....nations need to be activly seeking out this activity and ending it...one way or the other.
Id gladly trade another 2000 soldiers to take out say Iran's nuke programs in order to keep them from helping someone kill +20,000 people in the blast zone, if they slip some plutonium to an anti west group.
Keep your eyes on the countdown timer....
Timming is everything



posted on Aug, 1 2004 @ 09:34 PM
link   
I don't think you really even need 2 nukes or even to cause much damage with the first (i.e. only) one. If I point a gun at you and demand something, then shoot my *only* bullet over your head, you will assume that I have *another* bullet with which to kill you and likely comply. If I shoot you non-fatally, you will instead assume I am going to kill you and attack me in self defense. Thereby discovering that I really only had one bullet and perhaps your wound would spur you on to defeat me with whatever weapons you have. If I leave you healthy, you will want to stay healthy and I can defeat you with my empty gun.

[ Wow, that sounds somewhat philosophical, eh? ]



posted on Aug, 4 2004 @ 10:22 AM
link   
A interesting note related to this story. It was theorized that if a Nuke did go off in the ocean, we would be seeing this massive fishkill.



posted on Aug, 17 2004 @ 08:00 PM
link   
I really don't want to add any validity to this story, but the facts should be examined. In that vein, here is some additional info on the school of dead fished that washed up.



"We don't know what is going on," Vogelbein said Wednesday.

"These fish look healthy overall. The only thing I've noticed is they're hemorrhaging extensively from the gills. That's unusual - I've never seen that before."


Delaware Online



posted on Jul, 26 2006 @ 12:01 PM
link   
Text Black"drugnews: [DN] Clear & Imminent Nuclear Threat Inside The Continental United States

This is G o o g l e's
cache
of
mail.psychedelic-library.org...
as retrieved on Aug 7, 2005 02:21:33 GMT.
G o o g l e's cache is the snapshot that we took of the page as we crawled the web.
The page may have changed since that time. Click here for the
current page
without highlighting.
This cached page may reference images which are no longer available. Click here for the
cached text
only.
To link to or bookmark this page, use the following url: google.com/search

Google is neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its content.

These terms only appear in links pointing to this page: hq 2004 hagmann suitcase
drugnews

wixList

drugnews

Index
Index
psychedelic library
psychedelic library

[DN] Clear & Imminent Nuclear Threat Inside The Continental United States

Date: Monday, August 2, 2004 11:49 AM
From:
Peter Webster
Well, the following seems somewhat less than genuine, but with the latest
alerts in the U.S. perhaps we should at least know about it. It may be
part of the conspiracy to re-elect the Bushmaniacs, or just "something
completely different"...
DrugNews

Weekly Intelligence Brief
HQ Intel-Alert
Information on the cutting edge

Volume 1 Issue 18 17 July 2004

Dear Subscribers,

As I indicated on the HQ INTEL-ALERT forum, this is by far the most difficult
issue of the HQ INTEL-ALERT newsletter I have edited. Please take a moment
before reading this issue and ponder the following scenario - the only one
that
really comes to mind as I spoke with Steve, Laura, Sean, Skip and others who
will not be named in this issue (or never be named at their request).

I'm sure most of us, at one point in our lives experienced the all-too
realistic
frightening dream or nightmare. You know the kind I am talking about - the
kind
where you wake up, either in the middle of the night or in the morning, and
immediately begin to recall almost every detail of your very vivid dream or
nightmare. Perhaps you were sweating, your heart was racing, your hands
cold and
clammy, or perhaps you awoke in a panic. As you jolt out of bed, your panic or
anxiety turns into relief as you realize that it was just a nightmare you
experienced. You wipe the seat from your forehead as you realize that it
was all
just a bad dream.

Now, as you put your slippers on and wander into the kitchen for your first
cup
of coffee or tea of the day, you try to shake off that bad feeling from your
actually short but seemingly all-night ordeal. As you sit waiting for your
brew,
you still don't feel quite right. You begin to get that feeling back in the
pit
of your stomach that it was NOT a nightmare - it was NEVER a nightmare - it
was
REAL. You feel the blood rushing from your head and begin to feel lightheaded
and nauseous as you think back to the earlier events before you fell asleep
because of complete exhaustion.

My dear friends, the above scenario is about the best description of what
Steve,
myself and Laura and others experienced to one degree or another this week. I
know it sounds contrived and sensational, but I assure you it is not. The
subscribers who are reading this week's newsletter who are active in the
intelligence agencies and in the "information loop" know what is contained in
this week's issue is true.

We simply wish it wasn't.

The newsletter this week consists of TWO separate parts, each that are being
sent separately and a day apart. The first portion - the paper you are reading
now, contains the intelligence information. The second portion will contain
special preparation advice culled from a number of


mod edit to shorten link

[edit on 26-7-2006 by DontTreadOnMe]



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join