It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
March 12, 2011 at 10:23 AM
A federal judge in Virginia issued a ruling today that allows the US Department of Justice to access the Twitter accounts and associated data like the email addresses of principal WikiLeaks members, including Julian Assange. The measure comes after the DOJ subpoena’d those members back in January in a probe to determine whether or not they broke the law in their involvement with the organisation. The group’s lawyers have already decided to appeal, so we’ll have to wait and see just how much heat the WikiLeaks higher-ups will be in should an investigation truly begin
Originally posted by Seagle
And another example today -
Ruling Gives DOJ Access To WikiLeaks-Linked Twitter Accounts
March 12, 2011 at 10:23 AM
A federal judge in Virginia issued a ruling today that allows the US Department of Justice to access the Twitter accounts and associated data like the email addresses of principal WikiLeaks members, including Julian Assange. The measure comes after the DOJ subpoena’d those members back in January in a probe to determine whether or not they broke the law in their involvement with the organisation. The group’s lawyers have already decided to appeal, so we’ll have to wait and see just how much heat the WikiLeaks higher-ups will be in should an investigation truly begin
It’s Executive Order 13567, and it’s the one you linked on the White House website, “Periodic Review of Individuals Detained at Guantánamo Bay Naval Station Pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force.”
Originally posted by Pogsilive
I've been reading all the executive orders for the month of March and back into February, and I cant find this? Now I know its Fox, and they do have the tendency to Omit little facts, or even invent them, but I thought there might be something to this. Does anyone have the actual number for this executive order that The Judge talks of ?
That’s because, as you’ve alluded to earlier, Fox News has a tendency to, well, lie.
Has anyone read this? or are the comments just on what the judge said and other websites and or opinions? Ive read it, and I could be completely wrong, but I see nothing in this saying this.
Human Rights First is calling today’s executive order establishing a periodic adversarial review process for detainees held at the U.S. detention facility in Guantanamo Bay a step in the right direction. Even so, the organization is cautioning that the Obama Administration must now focus its attention on efforts to transfer those Guantanamo detainees who have been cleared for release and prosecute in federal courts those for whom there is evidence of criminal conduct.
The order sets up a new administrative procedure—the Periodic Review Board (PRB)—to review cases of individuals whom the administration’s task force previously selected for continued detention or criminal prosecution. The order disavows any claim of new detention authority. Rather, it provides an alternative avenue of release for detainees who, in the administration’s view, may be lawfully held under the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), as informed by the law of war.
The PRB is the latest installment in the alphabet soup of Guantanamo review schemes. On paper at least, it’s a significant improvement over the Combatant Status Review Tribunal (CSRT), created by the Bush administration in 2004 to rubber-stamp its determination that the detainees were “enemy combatants” and avoid the habeas corpus review the Supreme Court had just mandated in Rasul v. Bush. This time, detainees are assigned personal representatives who, well, actually represent them. (Under the CSRT, the detainees’ personal representatives could—and sometimes did—advocate against them). ...
But if you oppose the type of prolonged, indefinite detention that has come to define Guantanamo (as I do), the order is a mixed blessing at best.
Originally posted by GovtFlu
reply to post by Kali74
No rights being denied?.. how about the "right" to be freed by a jury / due process?
"Sec. 2. Standard for Continued Detention. Continued law of war detention is warranted for a detainee subject to the periodic review in section 3 of this order if it is necessary to protect against a significant threat to the security of the United States."
Some govt clowns "periodic review" can nullify a "not guilty" verdict as long as said clowns decide the acquitted represents "a significant threat to the security of the United States."
Originally posted by GovtFlu
reply to post by Kali74
No rights being denied?.. how about the "right" to be freed by a jury / due process?
"Sec. 2. Standard for Continued Detention. Continued law of war detention is warranted for a detainee subject to the periodic review in section 3 of this order if it is necessary to protect against a significant threat to the security of the United States."
Some govt clowns "periodic review" can nullify a "not guilty" verdict as long as said clowns decide the acquitted represents "a significant threat to the security of the United States."
Originally posted by aptness
It’s Executive Order 13567, and it’s the one you linked on the White House website, “Periodic Review of Individuals Detained at Guantánamo Bay Naval Station Pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force.”
Originally posted by Pogsilive
I've been reading all the executive orders for the month of March and back into February, and I cant find this? Now I know its Fox, and they do have the tendency to Omit little facts, or even invent them, but I thought there might be something to this. Does anyone have the actual number for this executive order that The Judge talks of ?
That’s because, as you’ve alluded to earlier, Fox News has a tendency to, well, lie.
Has anyone read this? or are the comments just on what the judge said and other websites and or opinions? Ive read it, and I could be completely wrong, but I see nothing in this saying this.
And it’s quite sad to see all these members outraged about it, treating this executive order like Obama just declared himself dictator — like Fox News told them to — when, in fact, this order is actually an improvement over the system invented and put in place by the Bush administration, which was patently worse.
I am by no means defending the Obama administration, because it has continued many of the Bush administration’s policies, and, in some cases, have gone even further. This, however, is simply not one of those cases.
Don’t take it from me, take it from, for example, Human Rights First, a US non-profit human rights organization—
Human Rights First is calling today’s executive order establishing a periodic adversarial review process for detainees held at the U.S. detention facility in Guantanamo Bay a step in the right direction. Even so, the organization is cautioning that the Obama Administration must now focus its attention on efforts to transfer those Guantanamo detainees who have been cleared for release and prosecute in federal courts those for whom there is evidence of criminal conduct.
Or from Jonathan Hafetz, a law professor who has defended some detainees in Guantanamo—
The order sets up a new administrative procedure—the Periodic Review Board (PRB)—to review cases of individuals whom the administration’s task force previously selected for continued detention or criminal prosecution. The order disavows any claim of new detention authority. Rather, it provides an alternative avenue of release for detainees who, in the administration’s view, may be lawfully held under the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), as informed by the law of war.
The PRB is the latest installment in the alphabet soup of Guantanamo review schemes. On paper at least, it’s a significant improvement over the Combatant Status Review Tribunal (CSRT), created by the Bush administration in 2004 to rubber-stamp its determination that the detainees were “enemy combatants” and avoid the habeas corpus review the Supreme Court had just mandated in Rasul v. Bush. This time, detainees are assigned personal representatives who, well, actually represent them. (Under the CSRT, the detainees’ personal representatives could—and sometimes did—advocate against them). ...
But if you oppose the type of prolonged, indefinite detention that has come to define Guantanamo (as I do), the order is a mixed blessing at best.
In sum, while Obama’s executive order improves the system created by the Bush administration — that Fox News didn’t bother to mention — it still falls short of Obama’s campaign promise of closing Guantanamo.
Things got a little bit better for the detainees and the rule of law, but it’s still an improvement to a system that shouldn’t exist in the first place if the Bush administration had followed the law, and if the Obama administration had the political courage to permanently fix.
edit on 12-3-2011 by aptness because: added link
Originally posted by Activist1984
Another bench mark on the road to all out tyranny in the US. I never have been able to understand the relationship between Andrew Napolitano and Janet Napolitano. How can two members of the same family be in such important positions on absolutely opposite ends of the spectrum? Is this a sham somehow, or just an enjoyable irony? What does Thanksgiving look like at their house when they sit around discussing their exploits? This just always has seemed suspect to me.
Originally posted by Fractured.Facade
Originally posted by the_denv
In all seriousness, this has scared the crap out of me but in the back of my head I knew it was coming.
It has been a long time coming, I pity those on both sides of the political divide who believe this is all about Obama.
That level of shallowness and ignorance is almost more frightening than this executive order.
Almost!
Originally posted by morder1
I think "The Judge" is about the only thing I can stand to watch on Fox anymore... He brings up some good points about the erosion of The Constitution...
I had heard a little about the bill that Obama had signed about Guantanamo Bay, but wow, keeping people for life after being acquitted???
Originally posted by morder1
Yeah really, where does this end?? Does it end 20 years from now when we are all living in 1984? Forced to love big brother...
Allow me, if you may, a little context and elaboration here.
Originally posted by Pogsilive
See how it says " Continued Law Of War Detention ..." Meaning, they are extending the Bush executive order from all the way back in 2001. Why are you blaming Obama for something Bush and Republicans already did?
Originally posted by DZAG Wright
We can foil the plans of the PTB at any moment by deciding to not participate anymore.
If we all stopped working this very minute, when I say all, I mean police, military, bank officers, everyone...the only thing we would have to do is work together to insure we all ate. We can have voluntary shifts at the power plants until the fuel ran out.
There wouldn't be any evictions because the bank officers and police aren't working! There would be no person to oppress you.
We would force the hidden PTB to finally show themselves because someone would have to come out the cave and attempt to force us to work again.