Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

The Elite Have A New and Very Devastating Weapon

page: 3
17
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join

posted on Mar, 8 2011 @ 06:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by AprilSky
reply to post by hippomchippo
 


Plug the word HAARP and earthquakes into Google.



You know, HAARP is notorious for many things... oO

www.abovetopsecret.com...




posted on Mar, 8 2011 @ 06:42 PM
link   
Oh I see it's haarp.
That's all fine and well since there is alot of the jury still out on what it truly is and what it does but when I start to
THINK about the claims that haarp has against it there are alot of questions that I already have that spur even more questions and I'll share a few with you.
1, The amount of energy needed to move earth from the haarp locations would require a path of destruction from said locations, the energy cannot be bundled and shipped so where would the path be.
2, The energy needed to move earth if it was delivered via directed sound waves would create an audible sustained frequency and if triangulated from the known haarp sites to a specific point would also leave as evidence populations hearing and feeling the tone(s) and subsonic effects so are there records or reports of this?
3, The forces required to shake earth remotely from any of the known haarp locations would produce that same shake over the entire globe, if it is directed generated heat on a location that is suspect then there would also be recorded signs and data showing extreme rises in ambient temperatures in the affected areas and where would that data be? What temperatures are we talking about that would move earth and how would that be possible?
What are the reference effects of the weapon on surrounding geography?

There's 3 just off the top of my head questions concerning haarp and earth movement,
I said earth movement.
Let's look at these before we move on to scalar waves and atmosphere manipulation.
Remember haarp gets blamed for alot and little is known about it so lets ferret out the truths before we label everything we dont understand as a weapon.

Thank you

And I do feel for you and am not insulting you, I'm just saying although it's bad lets look for horses first when we hear hooves not zebras.
edit on 8-3-2011 by HappilyEverAfter because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 8 2011 @ 06:43 PM
link   
reply to post by Hefficide
 


Yes I am from Christchurch and I am struggling to keep my house up!

I am very upset by what is going on and by the FEMA officials here and this being the US gateway to the Antarctic is very upsetting to me. They have never attacked us before and most of us can't believe they are doing it now but there is too much suspicious stuff going on. It can't all be a coincidence.

The waves definitely crashed into each other and the explanation that it started on the hills and reflected back on the hills makes no sense because my girlfriend lives inbetween the hills and the central city zone and central city got it first before her because she got a txt asking her "R U OK" before the shaking started at her house so how could it have started on the hills?

edit on 8-3-2011 by AprilSky because: grammar



posted on Mar, 8 2011 @ 06:44 PM
link   
I do not recall opposing waves from physics but anecdotally from observing ocean waves at the changing of the tide (waves coming in but tide starting to go out) the water gets real choppy and frothy and this could apply to the earth as well altho these forces are not equal...but the ground could buck and heave in similar action. BTW, I didnt real the entire thread but is there evidence to support the claim as to this weapon? One thing I will say is that the recent Christchurch quake was supposed to be an aftershock (unless that is the media cover story) to a larger quake that "missed" Christchurch by 30mi late last year (and this one was a direct hit). What is interesting is that the first quake struck at a depth of 10km which is the signature of a lot of quakes that some are attributing to angels playing HAARPs.



posted on Mar, 8 2011 @ 06:54 PM
link   
reply to post by AprilSky
 


Firstly, you said "seismologists running around in a non-earthquake zone". New Zealand is pretty much ALL an earthquake zone with over 512 earthquakes per year on average in our two small islands. Also, the particular area affected by the last quake, Christchurch, had a large earthquake back in 1996. Seems like a good place to study earthquakes if you ask me.

What were FEMA officials doing in New Zealand? This isn't the United States and they have no authority here, perhaps they were attending a conference, like are held all around the world.

HAARP power output & operating stats are viewable online (because of all those saying it is causing storms & earthquakes). Have you checked to see if any earthquakes correspond to any particular boost in output? (I must admit that I haven't, but then again I don't believe that it can cause earthquakes.)



posted on Mar, 8 2011 @ 06:56 PM
link   


Maybe the OP has seen "Under Seige 2: Dark Territory"
and feels that the Millitary really has a "Grazer One"
Satallite that can induce earthquakes from space.

:|
David Grouchy



posted on Mar, 8 2011 @ 06:58 PM
link   
reply to post by chr0naut
 


Well you see you can explain anything away ... even JFK getting shot by some lunatic, the question here is, is it believable that seismologist experts and FEMA just happened to be here?

And no Christchurch and the surrounding area was not known to be active and in 1996 nothing of any interest in the way of a quake happened here, it was on the other side of the Island.
edit on 8-3-2011 by AprilSky because: grammar



posted on Mar, 8 2011 @ 07:01 PM
link   
reply to post by chr0naut
 


137.229.36.30...

Here is the actual haarp site in alaska with available data by date.
I dont have all of the other world sites.



posted on Mar, 8 2011 @ 07:02 PM
link   
reply to post by davidgrouchy
 


I have never seen that film before but the elite do tell the truth in films, then they can say you are just an idiot and you saw that at the movies and don't you realise movies are just made up rubbish?

edit on 8-3-2011 by AprilSky because: missed word



posted on Mar, 8 2011 @ 07:07 PM
link   
reply to post by TheWalkingFox
 



I suppose that if believing the NWO has a killer earthquake death machine is fun for you, I can't stop you from buying it. But I do want you to ask yourself..


I'm not at all sure what caused the quake, from the pole shift to other things that may or may not have to do with them harming the core of the planet with HAARP like scalar waves, but I know they use weather warfare and make earthquakes occur. HAITI was no accident, and their taking over that country was deliberate at the cost of hundreds of thousands of lives, on strategic dates, 01 12 2010.

I do believe they have harmed the core of the planet as well.



posted on Mar, 8 2011 @ 07:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by Unity_99
reply to post by TheWalkingFox
 



I suppose that if believing the NWO has a killer earthquake death machine is fun for you, I can't stop you from buying it. But I do want you to ask yourself..


I'm not at all sure what caused the quake, from the pole shift to other things that may or may not have to do with them harming the core of the planet with HAARP like scalar waves, but I know they use weather warfare and make earthquakes occur. HAITI was no accident, and their taking over that country was deliberate at the cost of hundreds of thousands of lives, on strategic dates, 01 12 2010.

I do believe they have harmed the core of the planet as well.


You're right they do and occasionally they slip up and admit it ...

Words said on a Haiti documentary, some of them are in this U tube clip ...

"We've seen the destruction of a mega city, this is the first time since Tokyo 1923 that a gigantic city has been hit - hit by an earthquake. It's just indescribable, it's the first time we've really zapped a mega city below the belt, it's really unfair on the Haitians. Here's the thing, scientists don't really have emotions ..."




posted on Mar, 8 2011 @ 07:26 PM
link   
I doubt this technology is new ...

Revelation 6:14 And the heaven departed as a scroll when it is rolled together; and every mountain and island were moved out of their places.

I wonder if most of the world even realises how destructive this quake was ... notice everybody is focused on Libya and Egypt ... could any of you really give a damn about some little Island at the bottom of the world, isn't it more interesting to be worried about the price of oil?



posted on Mar, 8 2011 @ 07:59 PM
link   
reply to post by AprilSky
 


My apologies, you are correct in that there was no earthquake in 1996. I misread the details about an earthquake documentary that was made in 1996 about what would happen if an earthquake hit there.

However, there was a 7.1 quake in North Canterbury in 1888.

Also, the Banks Penninsula consists of the caldera's of two extinct volcanoes and sits almost on top of the edge of where the Pacific Plate subducts under the Australian Plate. It is not unusual or unnatural for such geology to experience earthquakes.



posted on Mar, 8 2011 @ 08:02 PM
link   
reply to post by AprilSky
 


Hi there my friend , Im really sorry about the crap your suffering right now but you have my support in investigating how you see fit my brother .

Let these people think as they wish .
But people like you and I obviously see life for what it is .

Trillion dollars unaccounted for, unjust wars wealth divide getting bigger .

The only aspect of the life the elite "dont " control is the weather therefore I think it foolish to assume they are not endeavouring to control it now.

Id rather be prepared than taken unaware

Peace to you and all of New Zealand and Australia from your brother in England



posted on Mar, 8 2011 @ 08:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by Aggie Man

Originally posted by AprilSky
OMG, this is not waves in water and believe me I experienced it and there was no canceling each other out, not before the whole place went crash!


A wave is a wave, regardless of the medium. The only difference is velocity. Furthermore, while experiencing it was tragic, it does not make you an expert on the subject; rather, a victim. Nonetheless, you could use a lesson in physics yourself.
edit on 8-3-2011 by Aggie Man because: (no reason given)


If the two waves are at different frequencies, the collision could result in a harmonic force with a much greater magnitude... That being said, I doubt the veracity of the claim of this new weapon.



posted on Mar, 8 2011 @ 08:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by clay2 baraka


If the two waves are at different frequencies, the collision could result in a harmonic force with a much greater magnitude... That being said, I doubt the veracity of the claim of this new weapon.


The fact that it happened is an absolute fact, all that is up for debate here is did the elite do it or not ???

For interest sake know this

There were new buildings in Christchurch central still in the framing stage and they were built to withstand a level 8 quake, this one (6.3 supposedly) we just had bent all there steel, twisted the frames and broke the bolts. The quake was far more powerful than the building standards for a level 8 quake.
edit on 8-3-2011 by AprilSky because: spelling



posted on Mar, 8 2011 @ 08:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by clay2 baraka
If the two waves are at different frequencies, the collision could result in a harmonic force with a much greater magnitude... That being said, I doubt the veracity of the claim of this new weapon.


I too doubt the veracity...scratch that, I outright challenge it and require proof; rather than suppositions. Nonetheless, if the frequencies differ, they would still only equal the difference between the two, rather than an amplification of the two.




posted on Mar, 8 2011 @ 08:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by Doomzilla
reply to post by AprilSky
 


Hi there my friend , Im really sorry about the crap your suffering right now but you have my support in investigating how you see fit my brother .

Let these people think as they wish .
But people like you and I obviously see life for what it is .

Trillion dollars unaccounted for, unjust wars wealth divide getting bigger .

The only aspect of the life the elite "dont " control is the weather therefore I think it foolish to assume they are not endeavouring to control it now.

Id rather be prepared than taken unaware

Peace to you and all of New Zealand and Australia from your brother in England


Thank you



posted on Mar, 8 2011 @ 08:53 PM
link   
OK. I have listened to the first thirty minutes of the blog radio show the OP posted.

The, I won't say proofs, but the points raised for consideration are:

- a US delegation comprising congressmen from both Illinois and Indiana (note: both located at the top of the Wabash Seismic area, part of the NMSZ) among other states ,and some FEMA guys (Janet Napolitano was supposed to attend) link

***the guy, Vinny, at this point makes references to this being a Bildeburg (sp?) meeting which is a super top secret sort of thing***

-there were reportedly 4 US Naval vessels off the coast of NZ that day

-NZ troops were in Christchurch doing a training exercise

-a recent revelation about a HAARP facility close to the region

-the day prior a pod of pilot whales beached on the coast

-in the few days before residents in a nearby village reported seeing "rainbow" clouds (so some sort of anomalous atmospheric event)

The shows host, Joe, draws the correlation between this situation and the NLE2011 taking place this year in the NMSZ.

The next guy on the show, Greg, says he believes it to be caused by inter-barometer scalar transmitters (Tesla's death ray)

*******************
SO here starts my questions? (which are legion because I don't know)


Does anyone here have any info regarding a possible HAARP location in the area around Christchurch?

The second guest speaker mentioned hearing booms from the sky before/during the earthquake to give evidence to the scalar wave theory. AprilSky, Did you or anyone you know hear booms or noise from the sky?

Like I said I haven't finished the audio yet, but I am wondering why the 2 earthquake theory?
From what I have read about the liquefaction of the ground caused by a shallow tremor, the damage is to be expected. I am not saying that the earthquake was natural, just the resulting damage. Because the ground turned for all intents and purposes to a liquid. Nothing is going to take that well.

Also, is there some geological feature to indicate why some area were more "liquified" than others?

The reason I ask is in relating this to the Arkansas earthquakes those too have been shallow in nature. Again, the worry being about liquefaction of the land. Which in turn brings me to my next question, if this is a test run for the NMSZ, how closely related are the substrata of the Christchurch area and the currently seismically active area of the NMSZ?

There have been a few posters on the thread about Arkansas fracking earthquakeswho mention "in the know" people who say TPTB are going to set it off to reduce the risk of a much larger, more damaging natural event. That's why to establish some validity in the argument that this is a test run, seeing if the geology is highly similar would at least throw some weight into the discussion.

All that being said, AprilSky I have few words that can express how much you and your fellow survivors are in my heart. May peace and truth and light be yours.



posted on Mar, 8 2011 @ 09:28 PM
link   
reply to post by amarenell
 


There is a new and usual type aerial up the port hills ham radio freaks could not work out what it is for.

The twin earthquake thing is up for debate but at the very least this quake was reflected by the hills and acted like a double quake, that much has been confirmed and is not a theory.

The questions is was it a true double quake which we have had many of, by the way but just smaller ones. We keep track of the after shock quakes and it is not uncommon for there to be two quakes in different locations happen in the same split second, so it is not much of a leap to suggest this was the same thing just both quakes were stronger.





new topics

top topics



 
17
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join