OK. I have listened to the first thirty minutes of the blog radio show the OP posted.
The, I won't say proofs, but the points raised for consideration are:
- a US delegation comprising congressmen from both Illinois and Indiana (note: both located at the top of the Wabash Seismic area, part of the NMSZ)
among other states ,and some FEMA guys (Janet Napolitano was supposed to attend)
***the guy, Vinny, at this point makes references to this being a Bildeburg (sp?) meeting which is a super top secret sort of thing***
-there were reportedly 4 US Naval vessels off the coast of NZ that day
-NZ troops were in Christchurch doing a training exercise
-a recent revelation about a HAARP facility close to the region
-the day prior a pod of pilot whales beached on the coast
-in the few days before residents in a nearby village reported seeing "rainbow" clouds (so some sort of anomalous atmospheric event)
The shows host, Joe, draws the correlation between this situation and the NLE2011 taking place this year in the NMSZ.
The next guy on the show, Greg, says he believes it to be caused by inter-barometer scalar transmitters (Tesla's death ray)
SO here starts my questions? (which are legion because I don't know)
Does anyone here have any info regarding a possible HAARP location in the area around Christchurch?
The second guest speaker mentioned hearing booms from the sky before/during the earthquake to give evidence to the scalar wave theory. AprilSky, Did
you or anyone you know hear booms or noise from the sky?
Like I said I haven't finished the audio yet, but I am wondering why the 2 earthquake theory?
From what I have read about the liquefaction of the ground caused by a shallow tremor, the damage is to be expected. I am not saying that the
earthquake was natural, just the resulting damage. Because the ground turned for all intents and purposes to a liquid. Nothing is going to take that
Also, is there some geological feature to indicate why some area were more "liquified" than others?
The reason I ask is in relating this to the Arkansas earthquakes those too have been shallow in nature. Again, the worry being about liquefaction of
the land. Which in turn brings me to my next question, if this is a test run for the NMSZ, how closely related are the substrata of the Christchurch
area and the currently seismically active area of the NMSZ?
There have been a few posters on the thread about Arkansas fracking earthquakes
mention "in the know" people who say TPTB are going to set it off to reduce the risk of a much larger, more damaging natural event. That's why to
establish some validity in the argument that this is a test run, seeing if the geology is highly similar would at least throw some weight into the
All that being said, AprilSky I have few words that can express how much you and your fellow survivors are in my heart. May peace and truth and light