It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by daddio
reply to post by Josephus23
I was sent a jury notice once, I wrote back and told them i could not do it as i was not the corporate fiction on the letter. The corporate fiction could not respond as he has no soul.
I got a letter back saying that if I should change my mind in the future, to consider sitting on a jury and "serving" my country"!!! What a joke!!
Originally posted by Josephus23
reply to post by Rastus3663
Statutes and codes only apply to corporations.
That is why we are incorporated at birth through the SSA and our birth certificate.
edit on 3/9/2011 by Josephus23 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by DZAG Wright
You have to decide whether you want to play the game or not...
What I mean by this is, persons who wish to utilize the Free Man technique must realize that they are basically separating themselves from a Matrix that has been created. What we call modern society. You can't sit on the fence with one leg in society and the other in Free Man Land. It's too difficult to walk that thin rail, you will slip and fall on to the Societal side and they will then crush you!
If you want to be a true Free Man you have to give up all the niceties you're enjoying, find some land and start your life there. You can't go to your job as a IT, driving your car on this societies roads, living in this societies property, eating its food, etc., and think you're going to thumb your nose at them anytime you want AND get away with it.
Either disconnect yourself from the Matrix or play by its rules. This is what's not shared by Free Men on the Land.
TPTB have created this matrix for us to dwell in and they'll be darned if they're going to allow one of their subjects # on them.
The Promissory Note To Pay Our Debts
HJR-192 of June 5, 1933 is the promissory note (the promise of Abraham) the government issued to balance the exchange to credit the people. The Promissory note is on the debit side of the United States Governments ledger, which was a debited from their credit, created by the Executive Order of April 5, 1933 when they took the gold out of circulation. Public Policy is rooted in HJR-192 and is Grace that creates our exemption. This is your temporal saving grace. Under grace, the law falls away to create a more perfect contract. Public Policy removed the people's liability to make all payments by making a contract null if it required the payment to be in substance, because the people didn't have any money to pay with. All that must be done now is to discharge the liability. Pay and discharge are similar words but the principles are as different as Old and New Testaments. The word "pay" is equated with gold and silver, or something of substance like a first-born lamb, which requires tangible work to be invested in it to remove the liability because an execution must occur. The word "Discharge" is equated with paper, or even more basic, simple credits and debits, that exist on paper only, like the slate held by the agents/angels of heaven that get swiped clean. You cannot pay a bill with a bill and you cannot pay a debt with a debt.
What HJR-192 did was, remove the liability of an obligor (someone obligated to pay a debt) by making it against Public Policy to pay debts. All that needs to be done now is discharge the debit with an appropriate credit "dollar for dollar." Debt must be discharged dollar for dollar in the same sense, as sin was discharged on the Cross. The moment a debt exists, it must be written off. The catch is, we can't write off the debt because we are not in possession of the account in deficit; our fiduciary agent is in possession of the account so we must provide him with the tax return (by the return of the original offer) so the fiduciary can discharge the liability through their internal revenue service (the bookkeeper). Most feel that when the money was taken out of society, the people became the slaves, this is not true, the people were freed from every obligation that society could create thus freeing the people from any obligation which they may incur simply because we cannot pay a debt. Ask yourself the question, What are you charging me with? And how do you expect Me to pay? Simply said, there is no money, plain and simple for me to make the payment with and on top of that, if I were to pay, who is paying Me to pay that guy and who's paying that guy and so on... Public Policy is the supercedious bond because it limits our liability to pay. It is the more perfect contract because it operates on grace to pay our debts after we have done all that we can. We go as far as we can to fulfill the obligation (acceptance and tax return) and after we have done all we can, mercy and grace kick in being our exemption to make the payment. Grace creates our exemption in the industrial society so long as we accept the charge.
Originally posted by ParkerCramer
Originally posted by Hefficide
.
Other domestic terror threats:
- Sovereign citizens movement
~Heff
I read the link you posted, and, yes it does read like propoganda, I also would have to believe that for every crime listed, murder, robbery, forgery, etc. that is committed by "Soverign Citizens" THOUSANDS will be commited by individuals that don't even know what "Sovereignty" is...............
Would you agree??
Your argument is still just based on "because they say it's so"
That does not make for a very good claim to denying ignorance.
Parker
Codification rearranges and displaces prior statutes and case decisions. Codification of an area of law generally constitutes the whole source relied upon for a legal question in that area. Thus, when a state codifies its criminal laws, the statutes contained within the new code supersede the laws that were in place prior to the codification. There are exceptions to this general rule. For example, the Michigan Supreme Court ruled in 1994 that Dr. Jack Kevorkian could be prosecuted under Michigan common law for assisting patient suicides, despite the absence of a statute prohibiting such action in Michigan's criminal-law code (People v. Kevorkian, 447 Mich. 436, 527 N.W.2d 714).
Originally posted by Rastus3663
reply to post by Josephus23
From West's Encyclopedia of American Law: Codification
Codification rearranges and displaces prior statutes and case decisions. Codification of an area of law generally constitutes the whole source relied upon for a legal question in that area. Thus, when a state codifies its criminal laws, the statutes contained within the new code supersede the laws that were in place prior to the codification. There are exceptions to this general rule. For example, the Michigan Supreme Court ruled in 1994 that Dr. Jack Kevorkian could be prosecuted under Michigan common law for assisting patient suicides, despite the absence of a statute prohibiting such action in Michigan's criminal-law code (People v. Kevorkian, 447 Mich. 436, 527 N.W.2d 714).
Originally posted by Rastus3663
reply to post by Josephus23
I must respectfully disagree; statutes are laws enacted by legislatures and they apply to the residents of the respective states. However, I'd be glad to look at your side of the argument and possibly revaluate my beliefs
I personally despise the legislative process and feel that every time a legislative body meets, every man,woman, and child under its jurisdiction is in jeopardy; rarely if ever, do they meet inorder to provide us with a benefit.
Differences Between Legal and Biological Paternity
The judge makes the final decision.
The legal father of a child is recognized by the court system as the child's father . He has all the legal rights and responsibilities of and to the child whether or not he is the biological father. The biological father of a child may or may not be the male established by a paternity action to be the legal father of the child.
When a child is born during marriage, the husband is presumed to be the child's father, even if the wife was known to be having an affair during the marriage. If another individual believes that he is the biological father of the child, he can bring a paternity action to become the legal father. If the judge decides that it is in the best interests of the child for the non-biological father to remain the legal father, then that will be the outcome, unless reversed on appeal.
Originally posted by Rastus3663
I must respectfully disagree; statutes are laws enacted by legislatures and they apply to the residents of the respective states. However, I'd be glad to look at your side of the argument and possibly revaluate my beliefs
No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid.To deny this, would be to affirm, that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves; that men acting by virtue of powers, may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid.
Article III - The Judicial Branch Note
Section 1 - Judicial powers
The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behavior, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services a Compensation which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.