Where to start? hmm. alright target acquired and preparing for launch. The FACTs of the matter are simple. We KNOW nothing. Everything from our idea
of scientific laws to the words of a fictitious best seller all hold the same credibility. Why is this? Oh he must insane. blah blah, read some
Wittgenstein and open the brain a little.
Reality. Relativity. They are the same. Far too few people look into their "truths" due to it being what is relevant to them.
Our brain works kind of like a computer. Information is data, and with only one source of input, the output can not be different. I mean, really how
do we know anything we know at all? Research shall be the answer. What is necessary in order to do research? Thought, in turn shows itself to be the
key. Where does thought originate from? Perception initiates thought. What do we perceive? We perceive that which is in our surroundings, otherwise
know as what is relative to us. Please note that surroundings does not necessarily mean your desk chair, bedroom, office, home, but it does include.
We are guilty of lies. Every single scientific law or cannon, razor, ect is false. This is because it is based on thought, so therefore it is not a
law, it is how we perceive the event or information. Sure, some things are more plausible than others, but to claim to know anything to an absolute is
"Oh but your wrong, for i can duplicate my results over and over again so it must be truth!" ...No, simply no. All you can duplicate is the output of
an idea based on the same set of inputs.
How does this all relate to the thread? Easy. Some are calling for others to not use certain input sources. Sure you have a right to ask this, and if
questioned it will be defended by others or even by myself. The people willing to step out and explore these new inputs have the right to do this as
well and once again will be defended.
2012 is not relevant to our society (although it seems to want to be), but it sure was to many ancient cultures. So once again our relativity train
begins. Who's on board? Destination: Truth. Layovers: Fiction, Laws, Life, Sacred texts, Ancient relics, misguided relevance, and a whole area full of
bull# (on both sides).
Why should we limit our power to think and be free, because someone else lets themselves or someone in their care become falsely scared. Scared of
what? thought? Death? Pain? Horror? Joy? Bliss? Relevant truths? ALL of these things will happen, one way or another. Too limit your life and let
other control it is why we are having this debate at all, and let me just say that to let others delegate how you think, is more than just wrong. It
goes against human rights, which is really what the Constitution is based on.
Edit in PS: Side note, is it not possible that the reason Y2k was blown up so big is so that people would dismiss the important discusion in the
future? Who hyped it up? mostly MSM, who is controlled by whom? Answer that, think about it, and share your answers with yourself.
8-3-2011 by derst1988 because: (no reason given)