It was most likely disputed and edited between two opposing editors over Wikipedia. I've had problems with people changing facts pertaining only to me and my families business over the site.

he might be a marxist. all the more reason to believe he isnt saying things coz someone is paying him.

Google doesnt label anyone anything. It captures Wikipedia as it looked on a certain day. Then someone edited out the word "marxist" (anyone can edit Wikipedia to accord to their beliefs you know) and now there is a discrepancy.
Shows how easily information (and with it reality) can be altered on the Internet.

Google continues to develop its services and take people to the future

Webster Tarpley is a cool dude. When you say Marxist do you mean how he interprets history? In which case he sees history as the product of bourgeoisie interests. I believe it is a valid way to interpret history. What did Margaret Meade say about small groups of people? That they are the only ones who will change things. Or something like that. I used to be weary of people who were labeled "racist", "Marxist", "blah, blah", and so on. I then realized that it is not a good idea to disregard someones opinion because they are labeled. You should watch Khaled Muhammed on the Phil Donahue Show or David Duke on the same show. You don't have to agree with everything they say. A person could say the wrong thing 90% of the time which might make you tune out and then you miss the 10% that was right. Does that make sense? Thank you