On the Kabbalah. On Esoteric “Secrets.” A Luciferian Perspective. On the Prophet of the New Aeon. On the Great Revealing. On the Great Work of
the Ages. On the Creation of a New Heaven and a New Earth. On Sex Magick, Luciferianism, Satanism and the Invocation of the Holy Guardian Angel. On
The 1000 Year Revolution of Light.
Lux e tenebris. Ordo ab chaos.
The Tree of Life, the Tree of Knowledge, the Serpent, and the Fruit
"All other things being equal, the simplest solution is the best."
”Nor let the fools mistake love; for there are love and love. There is the dove, and there is the serpent. Choose ye well”
A.C. Liber AL vel Legis (The Book of the Law).
The modern idea of religion, where there are commonly no secretive initiatons, appears to be quite unlike the many mystery cults of the ancient world,
where sex magick and religion were combined; where priests and priestesses served an erotic function and taught the sexual mysteries. This must be
considered in light of the numerous fantastical modern misinterpretations of the Genesis story by Biblical fanatics; however the Genesis story has
“no” hidden meaning and “no” secret interpretation. Only an understanding of the Hebrew and of the nature of the ancient mystery religions is
required to overcome the confusion of the literal translation, which is simply a misleading “mistranslation.”
In Hebrew, just like in our modern languages, many terms are used metaphorically. In the language of metaphor, we might say that a deluded person has
"lost their way" or is "dead to the world," for example. There is no hidden or secret meaning in such terms to those who understand the metaphors of
the English language. Similarly to all Hebrew scholars it is universally understood that to "eat a forbidden fruit” is a sexual metaphor.
Above: the Serpent.
In an ancient world where the priesthood, god kings and theocratic aristocracy commonly wore serpent headdresses and were commonly adorned with
serpent symbolism, a person of the ancient world would understand that a "Serpent" clearly refers to such a "priest," or “god king,” and that
opening one's eyes to "hidden knowledge" through sexual initiation was a reference to the mystery religions of the ancient world which were
commonplace when the Torah was likely to have been written.
Similarly the Tree of Life would have been understood, when the text was written, as the substructure of esoteric knowledge which was path-worked in
such cults; some esoteric traditions being considered malevolent by the authors of the text, and thus the “Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil.”
The Hebrew alphabet is a deliberate revealing of the esoteric knowledge of the ancient world, for it reveals such knowledge in it's 22 letters, each
representing one of the paths of the Tree of Life; each letter having it's own meaning; whereas in the modern English alphabet, the letters have no
Just as the ancient and heroic martyr, Prometheus, stole fire from the gods and gave it to humankind, similarly in modern times, many great works by
modern Prometheuses, such as Aleister Crowley's “Book of Thoth,” reveal what were once the closely guarded ancient secrets of the religious
Archons of a bygone era.
In world where our ancestors were able to eat of any fruit of any tree, the sexual metaphor becomes obvious, but at some point our ancestors became
slaves and sex slaves of a cult aristocracy where religion and government were entwined, and later, through the three great religious texts of the
world (The Bible, the Koran and the Vedas), slave morality was reinforced, and numerous “sins of restriction,” defining what a slave could and
could not do; thus the slave not only lived in terror of his master, whom he could see, but of his master's god who ruled in the unseen world.
The Kabbalistic basis of Masonic esotericism.
Behold! the rituals of the old time are black.
Let the evil ones be cast away; let the good ones be purged by the prophet! Then shall this Knowledge go aright.
I am the Magician and the Exorcist.
A.C. Liber AL vel Legis (The Book of the Law).
Freemasonry appears to be an esoteric society where the adherents are mostly entirely unaware of the esoteric knowledge which their society is based
upon, and upon reading their many rituals, I fail to find the simple correspondences with paths the Tree of Life. The few Masons who do understand the
Kabbalistic basis of their society appear to have gleaned such knowledge from external studies.
Probably one the most famous of Albert Pike’s sayings was that the real teachings of Freemasonry are hidden from the lower level initiates, and I
have found this to be the case in numerous discussions with Masons on and off the Internet, and in my studies of Masonic literature.
Since many Masonic authors, lifelong Masons and Masons who have purchased their 33 degrees of knowledge from a Masonic franchise, show a lack of
awareness of the subject, the question is thus begged as to what are the “lower levels,” which Pike was referring to? I would suggest that the
term “lower levels” applies to “all” the levels which have been publicly revealed. What lies beyond such publicly known levels is probably
“real” Freemasonry, which reveals the cult of the esoteric King of Kings (the Grand Master of Masters), but it is not necessary to purchase such
fake degrees of knowledge, for this knowledge is anyway in the public domain and should not anyway be bought and sold like a Capitalist commodity.
The 33 and 38 degrees of Knowledge.
It is my intention to explain the esoteric basis of the degrees of Kabbalistic knowledge in the language that a child could understand, and which does
not involve joining the many religious cults which are in the business of buying and selling such degrees, however internalising and fully
understanding this knowledge can take many years of study and path-working; the product of which is simply a “wise person;” not a stagecraft
magician. Knowledge can be gained in an instant, but the wise person is a product of a life dedicated to the utilisation of such knowledge. I merely
seek to simplify and summarise this knowledge for those who may wish to follow the narrow path to Heaven. Wide is the path to hell on earth and many
are they who follow it.
The significance of the 33 degrees of knowledge is clear and simple. There are 22 paths on the Tree of Life and there are 11 Sephira (spheres / divine
attributes) on the tree. These are the 33 degrees of knowledge, and in lodges with 38 degrees, the other 5 degrees simply represent the 5 elements.
This is all common knowledge in the Neopagan and Thelemic communities, and there are myriads of Internet sites on this subject, so I will not
elaborate on the meanings of the paths and of the Sephira, as I have nothing to add, but I would have much to subtract from the annoying sophistry,
confusion, and fantastical ramblings of metaphysicians on this subject who seek to beguile, deceive and to profit by such knowledge and to enslave the
human consciousness in mind control cults, and to entwine such knowledge with the “sins of restriction” which simply produces a terrified slave,
and not the free man and free woman.
The Major Arcana.
By the time I was in my early teens, all the archetypes of the 22 paths were thoroughly engrained in my consciousness, just as a child learns their
ABC's by picture cards. The 22 paths are best represented by the picture cards of the Major Arcana (lit. “mysterious or secret knowledge”) of the
Book of Thoth (i.e., Aleister Crowley's Egyptian Tarot), which convey the archetypal meanings of experiences and persons one will meet along the path
of life, however I in no way wish to imply that the use of this system by the numerous fake psychics and fortune tellers of Capitalism is beneficial,
and I share Crowley's contempt for the use of the system as entertainment and as a business for charlatans who claim to have psychic powers.
The psychic is simply a person who has a “psyche,” and since psyche is the consciousness, and we all have consciousness, we are all “psychic;”
however this should not be confused with the meaning of term “psychic” as used by professional hypnotists. The development of psychic powers in
Thelemic philosophy has nothing to do with performing fake miracles or stage tricks; it is about the empowerment of the human mind and the human will;
it is about self deification. Thoth is of course the Egyptian god of “wisdom,” and it is the development of the wisdom of the psyche which is the
point of the quest, not the development of a jester's stage craft.
The Minor Arcana
The remaining 1 to 10 cards of all the four suites of cards (relating to the astrological archetypes of earth, fire, air and water) refer to the 10
Sephira, and the remaining four cards (many decks have only three) in each suite refer to astrological archetypes of persons. In traditional decks
there are only 12 astrological archetypes, 8 are male (the Kings and Knights) and 4 are female (the Queens), however Crowley's Thoth system I find to
be more agreeable and less paternalistic, since there is the addition of the four Princesses, and thus there are 16 cards representing archetypal
persons whom one will meet along the path; the older and younger male, and the older and younger female; this seems more appropriate than conventional
packs, since of course, half the population are anyway female.
By using the system one ingrains such archetypes in one's consciousness. The rather tacky "fairground hustler" use of this system is the Capitalist
method of doing readings for others; however Crowley apparently rarely ever did readings for others; his expertise came mostly from studying and
path-working the system and by doing his own readings. We can never understand another person's mind as well as our own, and it is our own will which
is important to guide, and our own wisdom which we must embellish. The use of the system to gain hypnotic power over others is thus to be avoided, but
it may also be used to assist others.
Aleister Crowley's Book of Thoth can be read in entirety on:
however this is essentially the “Great Work” on
the Tarot and a “reference work” which can be referred to and re-referred to for advanced students of the system and should be used in conjunction
with the “actual” Book of Thoth, which is the actual set of Tarot cards.
There are also numerous other sites which give more simple explanations of the 78 archetypes (74 in some systems) which provide an extremely simple
introduction. There is also a much briefer description of the system in Crowley's LIBER LXXVIII (”A description of the cards of the Tarot with
their attributions; including a method of including a method of divination by their use.”
) on: hermetic.com...
however I do not recommend attempting to simply “read” such texts unless one is firstly in possession of the cards and is actually using them. It
is really a course of study rather than something which one could benefit from by reading once from beginning to end, which I suspect would only be a
path to confusion. Similarly with the I Ching, which is an oracle which has a practical function, one would not understand it by merely reading it
from beginning to end, without using it as a system of divination.
One will also encounter the linguistic problem of understanding Kabbalistic terms, however there are very few important terms to familiarise oneself
with, and it is essentially only 11 new terms which are the names of the Sephira. I speak many languages including psycho-babble and Kaballah-babble
but I refuse to use such terms when writing, as I prefer to simple English. My aim is to simplify and reveal; not to confuse and beguile. Any truthism
worth revealing should be able to be expressed in the most simple language.
The essence of the "esoteric tradition" can be explained quite simply and is not confined to any one esoteric society; it is something which "cannot"
be bought and sold; indeed it is not a "thing" at all, and neither is it a "secret." Once the archetypes of the system are engrained in one's
consciousness, then it becomes all so simple, and the complex ramblings of the Kabbalistic religious fanatics and profiteers and egotistical religious
charlatans appear as if the barking of a wild dog, or the rambling sophistry of a priest, whose intent is to hypnotise, and to claim "Mastery" over
others who are impressed by his sophistry. The truth is often very simple, but a lie is very complex and often contradictory and confusing, and
usually requires numerous other lies to support it.
The Kabbalistic explanation of the hermaphroditic (male/female) Creator is extremely simple form of truth which can be understood by children; however
throughout history numerous Kabbalistic authors and cultists have turned what is simple into complex ’grand systems’ of religious sophistry, often
accessible only to those who are initiates of multi-level forms of ritualism.
The Kabbalah centre, run by a multi-millionairee rabbi will sell you a copy of the Zohar for $500 or a red string for $20, and the numerous flavours
of Freemasonry may offer glimpses of aspects of the Tree, after years of initiations but frankly the simple truthisms behind all this sophistry do not
require one to become a victim of a mind control cult.
The Kabbalistic Creator can be understood by all Deists and Her definition can be arrived at by a study of nature and as a product of pure reason. She
an immanent (within Creation), deistic, animistic, hermaphroditic (male/female) spirit of singularity (one-ness) like the concept of Allah/Alpha. I am
referring to the god of Physics (i.e., Mother Nature), and not to an object of idolatry and worship, or a transcendental (up above) being, though
certainly many Kabbalists are transcendentalists, however the secrets of the Tree are very much about divine incarnation, about immanence, and have
nothing to do with the worship of a transcendent being; “up above” us is only the sky and the universe; within us, is the divine nature.
In Magick in Theory and Practice, Crowley unpacks the magical formula of the Tetragrammaton, YHVH or Yod-He-Vau-He..
The formation of the Yod is the formulation of the first creative force, of that father who is called "self-begotten", and unto whom it is said:
"Thou hast formulated thy Father, and made fertile thy Mother". The adding of the He to the Yod is the marriage of that Father to the great co-equal
Mother, who is a reflection of Nuit as He is of Hadit. Their union brings forth the son Vau who is the heir. Finally the daughter He is produced. She
is both the twin sister and the daughter of Vau.
The father, the mother, the son and daughter. Here is the divine incarnation and the image and likeness of the origin; this is the Holy Family. It is
not an image of celibacy the sexual repression, nor is it an image of an old man in sky sitting on a cloud, it is an entirely natural image.
The Kabbalistic Holy Trinity, the Three Degrees, and ’When you see me you see the Father.’
“For I am divided for love's sake, for the chance of union.
This is the creation of the world, that the pain of division is as nothing, and the joy of dissolution all.”
A.C. Book of the Law
Above: Left: female. Middle: Unification. Right: Male.
In the Tree of Life, we see three columns, the column of femininity, masculinity and unification (the union of male and female). In all creation we
see male and female, positive and negative. In the macro-universe, we find positive and negative magnetic forces interacting; in the micro-universe
also we see a world of positivity and negativity; in the animal kingdom, almost without exception (there are a few hermaphrodites) we also see male
and female; similarly in the human realm. The cosmos we perceive is essentially the interaction of such polar aspects.
The Kabbalistic Holy Trinity is not three Creators, but rather the divine image of a male and female entwined in love and lust. Two lovers kissing or
having sex for example; there you will see the divine incarnation and the perfection of the Holy Trinity. No temple nor icon nor idol can compare with
such a divine image. This is not a transcendent (up above) Holy Trinity; it is totally human and earthly and from this union is born the product of
the union, the holy child. This perhaps explains why human beings find it interesting to observe pornography, or indulge in voyeurism; they are simply
observing the divine image and the union of the two halves of creation; it is entirely natural and “pure;” any elements of fear and guilt
associated with what is entirely sacred and natural can only be due to the effects of religious hypnosis and indoctrination
Attachment, Alchemical Marriages and “sins of restriction.”
“The word of Sin is Restriction. .... There is no bond that can unite the divided but love: all else is a curse. Accursed! Accursed be it to the
It is common for a soul who is lonely to say that they seek their ’other half;’ this is because a female ’is’ the other half of creation to a
male. Alone, we are less godlike; as a pair of lovers, we are completely and perfectly godlike. ’Oneness’ with this kind of Creator is not a
transcendental or “other worldly” oneness, and thus this union cannot be found by a celibate meditating on a rock, for the Deistic Creator is an
immanent (within) hermaphroditic being, and thus, to become ’divine (godlike)’ requires oneness with another ’half’ through love and lust, and
in this divine union, the image of the two halves of the Creator appear as if one.
“(Monogamy) is purely the brainless bestial lust for exclusive possession.
They must adopt the slogan, "There shall be no property in human flesh..... the sentimental wrong of so-called infidelity is a symptom of the
childishness of the race.
A. C. Confessions.
Man has the right to love as he will - take your fill and will of love as ye will, when, where, and with whom ye will.
A.C. Liber Oz
Probably the two major sins promoted by the propagandists and priesthood of “slave morality” are celibacy and monogamy. Personal and emotional
attachment is desirable; we are creatures of love and desire, but the attachment which love brings has nothing to do with monogamy, which is an
unnatural state and a consequence of “The Fall” of humankind into a state of slavery where human beings have become private possessions.
In the minds of human beings, in their world of inner fantasy, we are not truly monogamous; the body of a slave may be monogamous but the mind always
rebels and in the realm of fantasy we act out our true nature. The Hindu idea of non-attachment and the Catholic idea of celibacy have no place here
at all; on the contrary, our minds and bodies should ideally become one through sacred union with other persons, and to restrict this to the sin of
monogamy is to limit our experience and joy.
The divine incarnation in the absence of love and lust is thus impossible. We cannot fully love ourselves; only another person can fully love us and
lust after us; which is what we all seek. If we do not have a lover, we create one in the realm of fantasy; if we do not have sex, we imagine having
sex; this is part of our ’true will; to resist and repress our true will is a “sin” against nature and the consequence is human misery,
depression and the self inflicted punishment of Hell on earth; of inner torment, psychological suffering and despair. We are designed in a certain
way, to derive pleasure in a certain way, and if we act in opposition to our nature, unhappiness is inevitable.
The Divine Hermaphrodite
It is my view that we are bisexual creatures, as are most of the higher animals. The experience of same gender sex allows us to experience both active
and passive roles. We all contain male and female hormones; we are all partly hermaphroditic; indeed often when Mother Nature is portrayed in
Kabbalistic art, it is often as a divine hermaphrodite; the Holy union of male and female; thus a bisexual creature is more “godlike.”
Generally bisexual experiences makes us more loving people, which is to say that we become more divine (godlike), whereas those who are homophobic are
generally filled with hatred of others and self hatred, which is to say that they are ungodly. In modern Western culture, images of homoerotic
relationships between women are generally considered to be erotic, even by exclusively heterosexual and homophobic males; it is love between males
which is probably the greatest taboo and an ultimate “sacred cow” to be slaughtered in order to reach a world of love; the New Heaven.
The Angel with the flaming sword who guards the path back to Eden
With regards to the "Angel with the Flaming Sword" which guards the path to the Tree of life, it is not from arrogance that I and many other
Thelemites invoke the role of Prometheus and lay claim to such a title; sacred knowledge freely received should be freely given and not wrapped in a
mystery within a mystery, designed to beguile and deceive and to be sold for Capitalist coin, nor to be used by a priesthood who use such knowledge to
enslave and beguile others and who have created Hell on earth with their numerous slave religions and their promotion of the “sins of
It is my view that the esoteric and Luciferian tradition today is represented by various "irregular" esoteric societies and by the Neopagan, Neowiccan
and New Age movement in general. This is very much a global philosophical movement which includes philosophical Satanism, and there is simply no
necessity for secrecy, for there is no Catholic Church with the power to burn us at the stake, though certainly perhaps the greatest resistance to
Thelemic revolution comes from the religious fanatics who promote the slave religions and the slave morality of Christianity and Islam, and who seek
to turn others into wretched miserable slaves, far from the divine image.
The Holy Guardian Angel (H.G.A) Invocation
I am in a secret fourfold word, the blasphemy against all gods of men.
Curse them! Curse them! Curse them!
With my Hawk's head I peck at the eyes of Jesus as he hangs upon the cross.
I flap my wings in the face of Mohammed & blind him.
With my claws I tear out the flesh of the Indian and the Buddhist, Mongol and Din.
Bahlasti! Ompehda! I spit on your crapulous creeds.
Let Mary inviolate be torn upon wheels: for her sake let all chaste women be utterly despised among you!
At all my meetings with you shall the priestess say -- and her eyes shall burn with desire as she stands bare and rejoicing in my secret temple -- To
me! To me! calling forth the flame of the hearts of all in her love-chant.......
A.C. The Book of the Law.
“I am the Snake that giveth Knowledge & Delight and bright glory, and stir the hearts of men with drunkenness. To worship me take wine and strange
drugs whereof I will tell my prophet, & be drunk thereof! They shall not harm ye at all. It is a lie, this folly against self. The exposure of
innocence is a lie. Be strong, o man! lust, enjoy all things of sense and rapture: fear not that any God shall deny thee for this."
A.C. The Book of the Law
The H.G.A. is a solitary and internal invocation (personification) and evocation (to call upon). For Crowley it was Aiwass, the High Priest of Horus,
and for others it may be Lucifer or Saturn or Venus or any of the historical archetypes, or any of the archetypal gods and goddesses, or the any of
the 72 Goetic daemons; it essentially depends upon what the magickian wishes to "become" and what things they wish to set in motion. I have attended
so many Neopagan rites that the pantomime rituals have little effect on me any more, and I no longer find them to be empowering; however an invocation
(personification) is an internal matter and it is not necessary to join a cult or attend a public ritual; it is an incarnation, a becoming; it is a
manifestation of certain divine qualities. Lucifer, of course is a mythical being, but the invented fiction of the Promethean archetype and his
rebellion against the tyranny of God is a useful one; for it is rebellion against the human hating slave-master gods of the established religions
which is crucial to the establishment of the New Heaven (the realm of the mind) and new Earth. .
Be careful of the archetype which you attempt to invoke, for that which you invoke, you become. The two most evil archetypes which are commonly
invoked in religion, are those of the religious fanatics and archetypal religious schizophrenics, Jesus and Mohammad, and such invocations open the
gates of Hell itself and must be considered utterly diabolical; it is the the evocation and invocation of such utterly vile archetypes which is the
problem in the modern world and which have produced the world of religious fanaticism, cults and slave religions, and which have produced the
psychological Hell which much of the world's population lives in. The fictional fanatic Jesus was a person who advocated strict adherence to the
primitive and savage Mosaic law, and both Mosaic law and Islamic law represent the antithesis of human freedom and of Thelemic revolution. Cursed and
damned are the Christians and Muslims; to hell with them.
By the invocation of Lucifer (or whatever archetype appeals to you), I do "not" refer to “possession” by an intelligence in another dimension;
Abramelin magick is about "dominion," not worship; it is also about the summoning (evocation) and "commanding" of daemons; it is quite the opposite of
possession and submission; it is about imposing the will of the magickian on human history, and the summoning of great universal intelligences which
will assist that; it is not about the will of God or the will of a daemon; it is a form of rebellion against God and against the religoius Archons
(Masters) of Heaven and Earth. Ultimately Luciferian initiation or self initiation is about self deification, self empowerment and rebellion against
God, and this is a matter of great seriousness.
There are a variety of philosophies in the new age movement including forms of spiritual Satanism, where Satanists have replaced "God" with "God's
adversary," but ultimately Luciferianism and Satanism are about adversarialism towards religious tyranny and about self empowerment; whereas Godism is
about the transformation of a human being into a wretched and miserable slave, afraid to follow their own nature for fear of eternal punishment by a
human hating, psychopathic deity.
”Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law. Love is the Law; Love under Will.
Every dictator in history has followed the mantra of “Do what thou wilt,” but this always involved the enslavement of the will of others to the
will of the dictator, and thus this is anti-thelemic; if everyone followed their own true will, and respected the free will of others, and adhered to
“There shall be no property in human flesh,”
none would be enslaved to the will of another.
The moral aspect of Thelemic philosophy is very simple and requires no mystification; it is little more more than humanist ethics and has become
expressed in the mantras of popular music and is already entwined with what Richard Dawkins refers to as the modern "moral Zeitgeist (the spirit of
the age);" such mantras as "follow your heart," or "live according to your nature," or "follow your intuition," or "live according to your desires,"
or "create your own reality," or “free your mind,” are already commonplace; we are simply referring to the abandonment of religious laws,
universal human freedom and the liberation of the enslaved. One should also not confuse the folly of the will a child, a fool, a tyrant or a hooligan
with the will of a wise man or wise woman, and thus it is the purpose of the Thoth system to guide the will and to teach the meaning of life.
Man has the right to kill those who would thwart these rights.
A.C. Liber LXXVII (Liber OZ)
Unfortunately we live in a world of religious fanatics who would seek to oppose our modern humanist rights and freedoms, and probably the greatest
three threats to human freedom are the vile professional hypnotists (i.e., the priesthood / clergy) and propagandists of the Islamic, Christian and
Vedic religions, the three major slave religions of humankind, however it is my judgement that at this present time it is the Islamic threat which is
most vile, apocalyptic and potentially genocidal, and where almost all women are essentially slaves.
Babalon and the Hierophant (the Prophet / High Priest).
In Christianity the male and female archetype is the celibate Jesus and the Virgin Mary. Although they mythical Jesus (i.e., God to the Christians)
allegedly and preposterously impregnated his mother, in order to give birth to himself, this relationship is not portrayed as sexual. The Holy Virgin
is essentially a repressed female who exists merely as the private property of her slave master (i.e., her husband); she is essentially a domestic
servant and a monogamous sex slave; death being the cruel punishment for a slave's infidelity, for doing nothing other than following her nature.
Images of the Holy Virgin are generally always of a desexualised woman.
The Babalon archetype on the other hand is represented in popular culture by music celebrities such as Lady Gaga and Madonna; they are positive
"Babalon / Scarlet Woman," maternalist and feminist archetypes and role models for the billions of women in the world, most of whom have been
indoctrinated by the "Virgin Mary" or "Aisha (Mohammad's favourite wife whom he deflowered when she was 9 years old)" archetypes.
The Babalon archetype is the modern feminist and the promiscuous bisexual dominatrix archetype; she is the personal possession of nobody; she is not a
slave, but a modern independent woman. She is of course a threat to all paternalists, anti-feminists, homophobes and religious fanatics who seek to
create a paternalistic Hell on earth where women are enslaved, and this of course was a consequence of the mythical “Fall” and of the
Babalon is also the High Priestess, however a priestess in Christian terms is essentially a “nun” who is a desexualised and repressed creature;
whereas the role of the priestess in the mystery cults of the ancient world was essentially that of what has been derogatorily described as a
“sacred whore;” similarly in Neopagan and Neowiccan ritualism, the priestess has an ultimately erotic role, which is a reversal of the
desexualisation of women in the repressive slave religions of Christianity and Islam. Babalon is in contrast a woman empowered, sexually liberated and
free to pursue her own will, rather than that of her slave master.
The Babalon archetype represents the narrow path to heaven for all women; and wide is the path to hell and destruction and many are they who walk upon
And the ring of the horizon above her is a company of glorious Archangels with joined hands, that stand and sing: This is the daughter of BABALON the
Beautiful, that she hath borne unto the Father of All. And unto all hath she borne her.
This is the Daughter of the King. This is the Virgin of Eternity. This is she that the Holy One hath wrested from the Giant Time, and the prize of
them that have overcome Space. This is she that is set upon the Throne of Understanding. Holy, Holy, Holy is her name, not to be spoken among men. For
Koré they have called her, and Malkuth, and Betulah, and Persephone.
And the poets have feigned songs about her, and the prophets have spoken vain things, and the young men have dreamed vain dreams; but this is she,
that immaculate, the name of whose name may not be spoken. Thought cannot pierce the glory that defendeth her, for thought is smitten dead before her
presence. Memory is blank, and in the most ancient books of Magick are neither words to conjure her, nor adorations to praise her. Will bends like a
reed in the tempests that sweep the borders of her kingdom, and imagination cannot figure so much as one petal of the lilies whereon she standeth in
the lake of crystal, in the sea of glass.
This is she that hath bedecked her hair with seven stars, the seven breaths of God that move and thrill its excellence. And she hath tired her hair
with seven combs, whereupon are written the seven secret names of God that are not known even of the Angels, or of the Archangels, or of the Leader of
the armies of the Lord.
Holy, Holy, Holy art thou, and blessed be Thy name for ever, unto whom the Aeons are but the pulsings of thy blood. "
A.C. "Book of Thoth"
In the Neopagan movement, the title of the Hierophant, prophet and mentor of the New Aeon is generally given to Aleister Crowley. Luciferianism as a
philosophy is of course not about worship, nor does it necessitate having a religious master, or of revering anyone uncritically, or even of revering
Crowley; on the contrary; it is about self deification; it is about the total transformation of oneself into the eternal enemy of God and of the "men
of God;" it is about the triumph of human will and the total eradication of "God's Will," as promoted by the major religions of the old Aeon. By this
“God” I of course refer to the transcendental imaginary friend of the theists, the vile enemies of humankind who promote all manner of lies and
sins of restriction, and not to “Mother Nature;” for She represents the antithesis of such a human nature hating deity.
Just as Babalon replaces the old Aeon archetype of the sexually repressed High Priestess, so too does the Beast (i.e., Aleister Crowley) replace Old
Aeon archetype of the desexualised High Priest or “prophet.” The new archetype is the antithesis of the celibate or monogamous male; he is
essentially a highly sexualised priest for whom nothing is forbidden, and rather than being a submissive and possessed priest, he is rather a
“Master” of the magickal arts and seeks dominion over the daemons he summons. This is not a priest who bows down and grovels, but he who takes
control, who makes demands and who seeks to insert his will into history and to direct and change history in accordance with his will. He is the
esoteric form of the “ubermensch (superior man),” rather than a grovelling, whining, praying slave in fear of phantoms, and he is the ultimate and
fearless enemy of the psychopathic God of the religionists.
On the Kabbalistic Heresy of Freemasonry.
Above the Grand Master: Field Marshal His Royal Highness Prince Edward George Nicholas Patrick, Duke of Kent, Earl of Saint Andrews, Baron
Downpatrick, Royal Knight of the Most Noble Order of the Garter, Knight Grand Cross of the Most Distinguished Order of Saint Michael and Saint George,
Knight Grand Cross of the Royal Victorian Order, Aide-de-Camp to Her Majesty, Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England and First Grand
Principal of the Supreme Grand Chapter of Royal Arch Masons of England, President of The Scout Association.
It is perfectly fair to judge a cultist by their cult leader, and just as in Catholicism, we have Jesus' representative on earth, Joseph Ratzinger, in
Masonry we have the aristocratic Fieldmarshall, the Duke of Kent. It is quite fair to judge a person by who their allies and enemies are, and
particularly by who their cult Master is, and certainly in Masonry the cult leader is part of the "Old World" and "old monied" monarchist and
Masonry, when scrutinised appears to be a rather silly "pantomime" cult where, at least from a UK perspective, the majority of Masons seem to join in
the hope of advancing their careers and of climbing up the Capitalist food chain; thus they mostly appear to join for economic reasons, not esoteric
reasons. Those who are esoterically inclined tend to entwine themselves with the modern Neopagan movement, not with Masonry.
While Freemasonry seems to be mostly a silly cult of old men in pantomime costumes with pantomime rites, many of the British Freemasons are certainly
part of the economic and military establishment; many of the leading financial institutions have their own lodges and there are around 40 military
lodges in the UK.
Their dominance in the "Square Mile" of the City of London is quite overt and there are allegedly several hundred lodges around the Square Mile alone.
Their "power" is essentially a “military and economic" power; Masons appear to be concerned mostly with the accumulation of Capital, not with the
salvation of humankind from Capitalism and from Religion.
Probably the classic work on British Masonry is Martin Short's "Inside the Brotherhood (1990)," which portrays the Masons as essentially a financially
incestuous Capitalist gang, much like many other gangs such as the Yakuza, the Triads, the Russian and Italian Mafia, Bloods and the Crips, all of
whom have pseudo-religious initiation rites and Messianic gang leaders who demand loyalty and obedience and who generally put acolytes through a
series of tests.
Masonry is essentially "pantomime Neopaganism," and it is a paternalistic (male supremacist) "male only" cult. The archetypal “Masonic wife” is
little more than a domestic pet and sex slave who is denied access to esoteric knowledge and kept ignorant; she is mostly certainly not the archetypla
Babalon; she is not the High Priestess; the Masonic wife rather represents the old world archetype of the Holy Mother. In the known degrees of
Masonry, there simply is no High Priestess; Freemasonry appears to be just another antiquated paternalistic “slave religion” like Christianity and
There are of course a few female lodges, but they are "women only" lodges. The barring of women from Masonry is of course very much to the advantage
of the growth of the New Age / Neopagan movement, where in my experience there are far more women than men.
One of the fabricated criticisms of Masonry by their Christian opponents is that allegedly Masons perform sex rituals; however, on the contrary, a
central problem with Masonic ritualism, in my judgement, is that they do "not" perform sex rituals, and that they are not anti-Christian enough, and
frankly I fail to see the point of magickal rituals which do not ultimately involve eroticism. This is perhaps why their rituals have been described
by some Masons as rather tedious and boring.
The Great Rite.
It has to be pointed out of course that many of the Neopagan societies are also pantomime societies, however the "Great Rite" simply cannot be
performed without sexual union, in fact, that is the entire point of the rite; it is the divine incarnation through the union of the Priest and the
High Priestess and the orgiastic communion of the assembled gathering. Such ritualism will of course in the Aeon to come replace the desexualised
monotony of the ramblings of priests in their Temples. A temple without sex is like a river without water; a Temple without Holy Communion through
sexual union simply serves no real magickal purpose.
Hiram Abiff (lit. king secret or secret king). The cult of the Secret King.
“For every slave a master and for every master a slave; neither slaves nor masters be; no gods no masters.
When adhering to a particular philosophy such as Thelemic or Nietzschean philosophy, one can scrutinise the writings of the philosopher, however in a
cult with a secret king, one is unable to scrutinise the philosophy and agenda of the cult's Messiah. Thus, rather than being a “wise man”
archetype, the Masonic neophyte (novice) is the archetypal fool; a lemming like creature who is ready to leap off a cliff edge into the unknown, and
probably for most cultists, the unknowable.
The Masonic cultist may spend his entire life in the cult, never truly understanding what the the cult was all about, or the idenity of the person to
whom the “Royal Secret” refers to. Further, in the world of such Messianic cults, each with it's own Master, each Master can also be in submission
to other masters, who serve other masters, and at some point, just as in all hierarchies, their must be a Grand Master of Masters, a Supreme Pontiff
or “King of Kings.” Such a “King of Kings” cannot of course be scrutinised and if he were a “Hitler” type character, the cultist has no
way of being able to scrutinise his master, and thus he takes upon himself the role of a person of totally blind faith, like a person trying to
appreciate a work of art while blindfolded. It may well be this sense of mystery which keeps the cultist curious and spellbound, for if the ordinary
mortality of his Master were to be revealed, the cultist may well be disappointed
Further, Freemasons tend to be "conservative" and entwined with the International Dictatorship of Capitalism and Anglo-American state terrorism,
narco-terrorism and imperialism. Most Freemasons are most certainly not part of the New Aeon movement or of Thelemic revolution, which is essentially
the revolution against God; many Freemasons seem to be essentially "Godists" and allies of humankind's greatest enemy, whose priesthood seek to
enslave humankind in fear and in the restriction of their sacred will.
Above: Pantomime Masonry prop from the DeMoulin "Side degree" catalogue.
On the thread "On Masonic Charity. The world's largest non religious charity scam. On the Shriners and Jesters
)," what is portrayed by the various articles on that thread is a bunch of silly old men in silly
hats and pantomime costumes who run bingo games and charity scams; they raise money for children's hospitals and can spend half a million dollars of
their charity funds in a weekend on partying with prostitutes; and who consider themselves to be a priesthood of holy knights, whose idea of esoteric
initiation includes dressing in rather silly "fancy dress" costumes, the application of electric shocks to the genitals of initiates, the covering of
their initiates' genitals with whipped cream and strawberries, the caging of them, the simulation of urinating on them with fake plastic penises, to
the accompaniment of howls of laughter from those who have assembled to watch their Holy initiation. These clowns do not appear to take themselves
very seriously at all.
It seems to me that many regular Masons are very much "men of God (i.e., the God of Capitalism);" they tend to have rather conservative values, and
the fact that they allow Muslims and Christians into their cult, and that they consider such vile blasphemies against the gods of nature (i.e., human
beings), such as the Bible and the Koran, to be "Volumes of Sacred Law" should be sufficient in itself to judge them as morally worthless and damnable
heretics. The Koran and the Bible represent the laws for an enslaved humanity and are the antithesis of natural Law; they are the books of God;
humankind's most vile and hateful enemy.
It seems to me that the Masons take their esoteric initiations about as seriously as a bunch of court jesters. This perhaps explains why they do not
seem to take their cult apologetics very seriously either; their standard defence strategy seems to be very similar to the Scientology "Fair Game"
strategy of simply hurling abuse, contempt and mockery at their critics; perhaps because their silly cult is rather impossible to defend seriously,
and they don't take it seriously anyway and behave rather like children in a playground or a gang of drunken football hooligans.
In summary, the Freemasons essentially appear to be a Capitalist gang whose primary concern appears to be the accumulation of Capital, by all means
necessary; many Freemasons play prominent roles in the International Dictatorship of Capitalism and in the Anglo-Amercan state terrorist /
narco-terrorist establishment; thus just like other Capitalist gangs, their demise in the near future is unlikley to occur, as long as the
International Dictatorship of Capitalism exists; further since the Masonic gang is probably "the" most economically powerful of the gangs of
Capitalism, and it is a Messianic cult, in a nuclear age age, this is one of just many Messianic cults which poses a threat to humankind.
The Accursed. The Dammed. The New Heaven and the New Earth
Long have Vanguard of Revolution cried out to all peoples and nations, as the lightening flashes from the East to the West, to turn their souls
against the enemy of humankind (i.e., God) and to devote their lives to rebellion against God and against all men of God, and in particular the
abominations of Islam and Christianity, and all manner of religious enslavement, and to the creation of the New Heaven and the New Earth. The New
Heaven (the world of the mind) requires the abandonment of God and of organised religion. The New Earth (Economic Heaven) requires the eventual
overthrowal of the International Dictatorship of Capitalism and the creation of Socialist Paradise.
"There is no god but man (and woman). ...The word of Sin is Restriction."
Or enemies and allies in this life, shall be our eternal enemies and allies. Eternally cursed are the acolytes of God; blessed are the enemies of God.
Great and Terrible and Dreadful and Wrathful shall be the Day of Judgement.
Eternal Enemy of God
Blasphemy, Heresy, War, Revolution, etc.
No mercy on they who deserve none.
”That which we repress, we become obsessed with.”
In Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh’s cult, which I was loosely associated with in my youth, was essentially a cult which promoted radical sexual freedom.
Sex is sacred. Love and lust are part of the purpose of existence and the opposite of sin. There should be no shame. It is by the hypnosis of the
priesthood and the acceptance of the “sins of restriction (the two greatest sins being celibacy and monogamy)” that many victims of religious
hypnosis and indoctrination become ashamed of all that is pure and natural.
”That which we repress, we become obsessed with.”
perhaps explains the tendency of the Catholic priesthood to violate the will of children,
but the unhappiness and frustration which comes with repression is not exclusive to Catholicism; those who promote the sins of celibacy and monogamy
are all affected by this. In a polyamorous (many lovers) world there would simply be no need for sexual repression. Our world is sexually
dysfunctional (it is not functioning as nature intended) and sex crime often the consequence, where the free will of another becomes violated.
I am no longer a follower of OSHO, however despite his obvious flaws, the rather cultish nature of his anti-religion, and his tendency to purchase
numerous Rolls' Royces, he was certainly one of the “Great Philosophers” of human history, and an enemy of God and of slave religion and slave
morality. Most of the great philosophers were flawed human beings, but it does not negate their philosophy, which is either true or not true.
On the Five Techniques of the Enslavement of Humankind.
Sex is the most powerful instinct in man. The politician and the priest have understood from the very beginning that sex is the most driving energy in
man. It has to be curtailed, it has to be cut. If man is allowed total Freedom in sex, then there will be no possibility to dominate him. To make a
slave out of him will be impossible.
Have you not seen it being done? When you want a bull to be yoked to a cart, what do you do? You castrate him, you destroy his sex energy. And have
you seen the difference between a bull and an ox? What a difference! An ox is a poor phenomenon, a slave. A bull is a beauty; a bull is a glorious
phenomenon, a great splendour. See a bull walking, how he walks like an emperor! And see an ox pulling a cart.
The same has been done to man. The sex instinct has been curtailed, cut, crippled. Man does not exist as the bull now, he exists like the ox, and each
man is pulling a thousand and one carts. Look and you will find behind you a thousand and one carts, and you are yoked to them.
Why can’t you yoke a bull? The bull is too powerful. If he sees a cow passing by, he will throw both you and the cart, and he will move to the cow!
He will not bother a bit about who you are, and he will not listen. It will be impossible to control the bull. Sex energy is life energy; it is
uncontrollable. And the politician and the priest are not interested in you, they are interested in channelling your energy into other directions. So
there is a certain Mechanism behind it--it has to be understood.
Sex repression, tabooing sex, is the very foundation of human slavery. Man cannot be free unless sex is free. Man cannot be really free unless his sex
energy is allowed natural growth.
These are the five tricks through which man has been turned into a slave, into an ugly phenomenon, a cripple.
The first is:
Keep man as weak as possible if you want to dominate him. If the priest wants to dominate you or the politician wants to dominate you, you have to be
kept as weak as possible. And the best way to keep a man weak is not to give love total freedom. Love is nourishment..."
Keep man as ignorant and deluded as possible so that he can easily be deceived..."
"...The third secret:
Keep man as frightened as possible. And the sure way is not to allow him love, because love destroys fear--’love casteth out fear.’ When you are
not in love you become more interested in security, in safety. When you are in love you are more interested in adventure, in exploration...."
Keep man as miserable as possible--because a miserable man is confused, a miserable man has no self-worth, a miserable man is self-condemnatory, a
miserable man feels that he must have done something wrong. A miserable man has no grounding--you can push him from here and there, he can be turned
into driftwood very easily. And a miserable man is always ready to be commanded, to be ordered, to be disciplined, because he knows ’On my own I am
simply miserable. Maybe somebody else can discipline my life.’ He is a ready victim."
"And the fifth:
Keep men as alienated from each other as possible, so that they cannot band together for some purpose of which the priest and the politician may not
approve. Keep people separate from each other. Don’t allow them too much intimacy. When people are separate, lonely, alienated from each other, they
cannot band together. And there are a thousand and one tricks to keep them apart.
For example, if you are holding the hand of a man--you are a man and you are holding the hand of a man and walking down the road, singing--you will
feel guilty because people will start looking at you. Are you gay, homosexual or something? Two men are not allowed to be happy together. They are
condemned as homosexuals. Fear arises. If your friend comes and takes your hand in his hand, you look around: ’Is somebody looking or not?’ And
you are just in a hurry to drop the hand..."
...the social system of England makes it impossible for a young man of spirit and intelligence to satisfy his nature with regard to sex in any
reasonable way. The young girl of position similar to his own is being fattened for the market. Even when his own situation makes it possible for him
to obtain her he has to pay an appalling price; and it becomes more difficult than ever for him to enjoy female companionship. Monogyny is nonsense
for any one with a grain of imagination. The more sides he has to his nature, the more women he needs to satisfy it. The same is, of course, true,
mutatis mutandis, of women. ….. It is monstrous for a man to pretend to be devoted to securing his wife's happiness and yet to wish to deprive her
of a woman's supreme joy: that of bearing a child to the man whom she desires sexually, and is therefore indicated by nature as the proper
father...... We have heard a great deal in recent years of the freedom of women. They have gained what they thought they wanted and it has availed
them nothing. They must adopt the slogan, "There shall be no property in human flesh..... the sentimental wrong of so-called infidelity is a symptom
of the childishness of the race. Among artists, the system here advocated has always been more or less in full swing.
Anthropology proves these theorems thoroughly. The first step in civilization is to restrain women from infidelity. The institutions of the pardah,
sati and the marriage laws all show that men think that women must be kept under lock and key, whereas women have always realized that it is
impossible and undesirable to prevent men from taking their happiness where they find it. The emancipation of women, therefore, depends entirely upon
leaving them free to act as men do. Their good sense will prevent them from inflicting the real wrongs; and besides, their complete independence and
happiness will encourage them in nobility and generosity.
We already see, in America, the results of the emancipation of women from the economic fetter. There is an immense class of bachelor girls (and of
married women whose husbands are strictly business machines) who pick up men with the same nonchalance as the young "blood" picked up women in my time
In the periods of suppression my brain had been completely clogged.....Repression is as mentally unwholesome as constipation... I certainly found even
forty-eight hours of abstinence sufficient to dull the fine edge of my mind. Woe unto them by whom offences come! The stupidity of having had to waste
uncounted priceless hours in chasing what ought to have been brought to the back door every evening with the milk!
Aleister Crowley. “Confessions”
edit on 7-3-2011 by Lucifer777 because: mis-spelling-itis, and the text was not not diabolical and sacreligious enough.