Stan is the man, he really is down to earth and realistic. You really dont see much of that any more. Last of a dying breed. I will miss him when he
is gone, he has done a great service to ufology.
Well you have several kinds of debunkers, i am kind of going to have to disgree with his stance about debunkers harming the subject. Because people
will believe UFO's are real even if you debunk so many cases still. Debunking is as important as skepticism, from my understanding Debunking is a
process used to eliminate explanations in a scientific manner. Such as people who film planes and call them "UFO's" and "Morphing Orbs" and "Fake
Planes" just nonsense. So you debunk, debunk by providing data such as vector routes, light configuration. So if said hoaxer keeps providing hoax
footage and you debunk video after video who does it harm? Debunk what you can and whatever left standing we can go on. Debunking is just a method it
depends on the intent and if you abuse it if you are on the side of truth or deception.
By exposing the hoaxers it does open a safe zone to authentic UFO footage. I just dont see many people throwing in the towel over a few debunking's?
They just keep on searching, at least most people I know in pursuit of the truth. But clowns like Bill Nye "the lie guy" are out to mislead people he
is no debunker. It's people like Nye & Phil "no" Klass that pose and call themself skeptics and debunkers that give skeptics and debunkers a bad name.
Just like hoaxers pretending to be truth seekers. I find both to be the same kind of animal.
But yeah Stan makes several great points like usual. I think he tends to lean in to the side of belief at times and that puts him in a bad light. But
over all he is damn serious and by the book.
edit on 6-3-2011 by Unknown Soldier because: (no reason given)
6-3-2011 by Unknown Soldier because: (no reason given)