Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Julian Assange claims Jewish Conspiracy!!!!

page: 1
3

log in

join

posted on Mar, 5 2011 @ 08:58 PM
link   
Private Eye editor Ian Hislop has written that he received a rambling phone call from Wiki-leak's boss Julian Assange, claiming that British journalists, including the editor of The Guardian, were engaged in a Jewish-led conspiracy to smear Wiki-Leaks.

Read more:liberalconspiracy.org...




posted on Mar, 5 2011 @ 09:02 PM
link   
reply to post by GodIsPissed
 


oy vey!!

they found us out.....
.


WHO really BELIEVES this DRECK????




posted on Mar, 5 2011 @ 10:16 PM
link   
w/ Zionists...all things/situations are possible...

I honestly would not be surprised especially if Assange has some Jewish-insider info that he will be releasing soon.



posted on Mar, 5 2011 @ 10:30 PM
link   
reply to post by GodIsPissed
 


The claims are false, according to Wikileaks/Assange.


Assange said "Hislop has distorted, invented or misremembered almost every significant claim and phrase. In particular, 'Jewish conspiracy' is false, in spirit and in word. It is serious and upsetting. Rather than correct a smear, Mr. Hislop has tried to justify one smear with another. That he has a reputation for this, and is famed to have received more libel suits in the UK than any other journalist as a result, does not mean that it is right. WikiLeaks promotes the ideal of "scientific journalism" - where the underlaying evidence of all articles is available to the reader precisely inorder to avoid these type of distortions. We treasure our strong Jewish support and staff, just as we treasure the support from pan-Arab democracy activists and others who share our hope for a just world."

. . .

"We treasure our strong Jewish support and staff, just as we treasure the support from pan-Arab democracy activists and others who share our hope for a just world,"



posted on Mar, 6 2011 @ 06:26 AM
link   
reply to post by GodIsPissed
 


Why would Assange implicate the Israelis?

All of the "secret intel" that he releases makes them look like angels instead of war criminals, while the intel found in the cables regarding their enemies always have some kind of dirt on them. (including the US)
This is total BS.

Assange works for Israel for Christ's sake.
edit on 3/6/2011 by Josephus23 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 6 2011 @ 10:24 AM
link   
How do you know who to believe?

I mean what were his exact words?



posted on Mar, 19 2011 @ 11:14 PM
link   
'Private Eye' is a magazine which expresses a particularly strong moral dislike of misogyny, anti-feminism, holocaust denial and anti-Semitism – in public that is. Behind the scenes at 'Private Eye', things are rather different.

'Private Eye' appeared to be so obviously concerned that Julian Assange might have caused harm to women and Jewish people, I took them at their word and wrote to Ian Hislop. My letter warned of something far more dangerous and sinister than Assange's alleged crimes.

For decades, an individual has been churning out hate material and spreading it all over the internet. Not on hidden 'Darknet' sites and not even anonymously. It is all published under his own name and is easily obtainable from any of his numerous hate sites. Here are a few samples.

“It is no coincidence that those at the forefront of the campaign for so-called 'feminism' are Marxists and Jews. Indeed, the whole 'women's liberation movement' was the creation of Jews...”

“ This was the hoax of the Jewish 'holocaust'.”

“There are several excellent reasons why the story of "the Jewish holocaust" is a fictional tale - a product of Zionist propaganda - and why the so-called "evidence" which is produced, and which has been produced, in support of this story is suspect or false.”

Strangely, 'Private Eye's abhorrence of anti-Semitism and its pious concern for the defence of feminists, evaporated completely as soon someone other than Assange was being accused. 'Private Eye' didn't want to run the story and no, they wouldn't even publish a letter on the subject.

So it seems Holocaust denial and misogyny are not the real issues for 'Private Eye'. It is Julian Assange himself that they disapprove of.

But why Assange and not the author of the hate material ? Read a little further and you will begin to see that 'Private Eye' is a bit more pro-establishment than it would have us believe.

The purveyor of the hate material is a police informer, with alleged links to MI5. The authorities' failure to arrest this man, even though he has published illegal hate material for thirty years, certainly supports this assertion.

My letter to 'Private Eye' explained that the hate sites are used as 'honey traps' to attract extremists for the purpose of ID theft. The information is then passed on to the authorities. The problem with this strategy is that, although some extremists are prompted to attempt acts of terrorism by the material, they are not always caught in time. This is what happened in London in 1999. A young man, heavily influenced by the informer's hate material, set off a series of nail bombs before he was caught by the police. An unborn child and its mother and many others, were killed in these attacks. At the time the security services said that the police informer was not under surveillance, so they could not have prevented the loss of life. Now more than a decade later, the informer is still publishing his dangerous nonsense and nothing is done. So it looks as if the bomb victim's families were lied to in 1999, because this person is an informer and they knew exactly what he was up to.

But 'Private Eye', the magazine which promotes itself as a fearless exposer of the truth, wont touch this story. They wont even allow any mention of the informer in their letters page. Yet Julian Assange is pilloried in every issue of the 'Eye', over allegations which at present haven't even been tested in court.

Could it be that for 'Private Eye', Holocaust denial and manslaughter is O.K. If MI5 says it is?

Some very lucrative careers in the mainstream media have been launched on the back of 'anti-establishment' satirical magazine 'Private Eye'. Next time you see a rich little guy on TV 'defending to the death' our right to free speech, just remember it doesn't extend to the unborn child who was blown up before it had a chance to live.






top topics



 
3

log in

join