It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has the unfettered right to declare any piece of land ANYWHERE (under the Clean Water Act) as a "wetlands." At the Obama Environmental Protection Agency's discretion, they can take over your private property, or tell you that you can't build your dream home on the land you bought simply by designating it a "wetland." And so far, you cannot do anything about it without spending far more than you paid for the property you are about to build on. If you choose to fight the federal bureaucracy for their takeover of your land, you --- or any landowner - can be assessed prohibitive penalties to fight the abrogation of your right use your own land.
The most frightening thing about the EPA's over-reach is that they have found a way to exercise eminent domain in a way they never have to buy they land they "seize." In a real twist, in fact, the owners still has to keep up the taxes on the land --- even though they can never use it!
A hard-working Idaho couple found this out the hard way. Mike and Chantell Sackett own a half-acre lot in a RESIDENTIAL area near Priest Lake in northern Idaho. All they wanted to do was to build a home. Not an ostentatious home. Just their dream home. The lot exists within a built-out area near the Lake. The lot itself has an existing sewer hookup, and is zoned for RESIDENTIAL construction.
Federal regulators claim they have power to forbid Chantell and Michael Sackett, of Spokane, from building a house on their small parcel in a residential area of Priest Lake – and the Sacketts announced today that they have asked the full Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to rule that they can challenge this federal power play in court.
Originally posted by MMPI2
The imperial U.S. federal government owns you.
The most frightening thing about the EPA's over-reach is that they have found a way to exercise eminent domain in a way they never have to buy they land they "seize." In a real twist, in fact, the owners still has to keep up the taxes on the land --- even though they can never use it!
But the Sacketts are being denied their day in court. In September, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit ruled that the Sacketts can’t get judicial review of the EPA’s assertion of power over them unless they first go through the long and expensive – and ultimately futile – process of formally applying for a federal wetlands permit. That process could take years and cost $200,000 or more.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Originally posted by MMPI2
The imperial U.S. federal government owns you.
so please tell us
how does this control end ???
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Originally posted by MMPI2
The imperial U.S. federal government owns you.
so please tell us
how does this control end ???
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Originally posted by MMPI2
The imperial U.S. federal government owns you.
so please tell us
how does this control end ???
In 1989, Ocie Mills and his son Carey went to prison for placing 19 loads of sand and cleaning out a 300-foot drainage ditch on their own Florida property. Ocie Mills had wanted to build a house for his son near the ditch and needed the fill to solve already-existing drainage problems. He was told by Florida environmental officials that he did not need a permit. Indeed, he received a letter from Florida Department of Environmental Regulation Assistant General Counsel E. Gary Early, stating that investigation had "determined that you were maintaining your existing canal rather than engaging in new dredging activities. Maintaining existing structures is specifically exempted from further permit requirements." This pronouncement notwithstanding, Ocie Mills and his son were later convicted of "knowingly discharging fill material in wetlands," and of "dredging a canal in navigable waters." For these crimes, the two were each sentenced to 21 months in prison, freed $5000, and ordered to restore the property. Keith Onsdorff, an EPA associate enforcement counsel, argued that this penalty would "send a strong message across the country that those who knowingly violate environmental laws are going to jail."
Originally posted by MMPI2
it does not end. ever.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
reply to post by hounddoghowlie
geez, going to prison for 21 months
just cuz u dumped a few loads of
sand to build a house?
So does that mean I can fine the EPA
for digging tons of fill dirt on the wetlands here
in NC cuz they dug up millions of tons of dirt
to construct Hwy 74 connecting Wilmington
to Charlotte ???
Isn't it the very same thing ???