reply to post by samaka
Originally posted by samaka
Evolution doesn't have any flaws in it. Please, direct me to a single flaw. And creationism isn't a theory.
Evolution doesn't have any flaws in it you say? That kind of made me chuckled a bit.
...not in its basic premises. Sure, on the fine details any theory is going to have its flaws.
Evolution is a theory, theories have flaws written all over. I can sit here a pinpoint them 1 by 1.
I'm going to put this symbol:
whenever I see a tired or useless argument.
Evolution doesn't explain the origin of life.
Evolution explains biodiversity. Does stellar fusion have to explain the origin of planetoids? Didn't think so. Theories are narrow fields of study.
The field of study relating to the origin of life is referred to as abiogenesis.
Scientist have been unable to prove that life can spring from nonliving molecules this is a fact...
Incorrect, there have been all sorts of experiments that give credence to the idea that have been repeated ad nauseum.
Don't you have basic access to Wiki?
Where are all the transitional fossils?
Sure you can me show a pretty picture of a fish evolving to reptile to mammal and say each species of fossils is in transitional but that is highly
I'm sorry, but evolution doesn't happen in such sweeping manners. And yes, each species is a transition. It is called genetic mutation. You and I
each have somewhere in the area of 180 mutations. 180 bits of genetic code that are different from our parents in some way.
For an animal to evolve a fin to a limb is a HUGE step and logically isn't possible.
Except that it isn't and Tiktaalik
is a great example of it.
So tell me where are transitional fossils from the animal evolving because it would take more then 4 - 5 species in the evolution chain to get to the
Just because DNA mutates doesn't mean it's evolution. There isn't any evidence of humans DNA mutating even though humans live in different climates
around the world.
...yes, there is. There's even a thread in this very subforum about it.
And again, we
have 180ish mutations each. There is no such thing as reproduction without mutation.
Oh, and skin color. That's sort of evidence of mutation. Then there's sickle cells. Sickle cell anemia is a great example of mutation that
There's more evidence that support creation then evolution.
I recommend every evolutionist to read up on cambrian explosion.
No clue what an 'evolutionist' is. Is it something like a "F=ma-ist"? And I've read up on the Cambrian explosion, great support for evolution
It is evident to me that evolution is a religion more so than scientific fact.
Nope, you're wrong. It's verified scientific fact that is backed up by 150 years of scientific research.
Evolutionist have FAITH on mere coincidences in events that's impossible to even occur.
They have faith on scientific data that's base of a theory that's not even a fact.
How is it faith when that scientific data can be independently verified.
Evolution is both a theory and a fact. You clearly don't know what a 'theory' is.
Evolutionist like to believe that 2 very big rocks width the perfect dimensions going at the perfect speed at the perfect angle colliding at the
perfect time in perfect location in space that formed the perfect earth that's at the perfect distance, rotating the earth perfectly while orbiting
perfectly around the sun..... I literally can on, but you get my point...
Really big straw man.
Please, put down the Kent Hovind videos and crack open a college level biology book.