It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DISRAELI
reply to post by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
I would argue that the "harlot of Babylon" is a corporate body, not an individual.
She's part of the long Biblical tradition in which Israel is metaphorically represented as a woman, the faithful or unfaithful wife of God.
She rests on the "Beast from the sea", which is also a corporate body (the human individual who most deserves to be called an "antichrist" is represented in Revelation by the second Beast, the "beast from the land")
I ended up doing five different threads on the nature of the Harlot, but a good starting point would be;
Harlot Babylon; "the other woman"
Danbones-
Ps have any of you actually considered that the Aunti christ might be .....
a ..girl
after all christ was a boy...
they say
Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
Would you say that the US and its relationship to Israel is similar to the antichrist and his relation to the whore of babylon?
Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
By the way, when I say "whore" of Babylon, I am just calling it as what I've read over the years. Perhaps a whore 2000 years ago is not considered a whore today, but that's what they called her (probably has something to do with temptation and the seven sins)
Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
Do you consider the beast and the antichrist to be two separate entities also?
Originally posted by DISRAELI
Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
Do you consider the beast and the antichrist to be two separate entities also?
Revelation ch13 has got two different beasts, one "from the sea" and one "from the land".
On analogy with the "beasts from the sea" in Daniel ch7, I've been assuming that the first beast is a political state.
The beast on which the harlot is sitting appears to be the first beast.
PS Incidentally, it is the first beast, and not the second, that suffers the "mortal wound".
So the appearing to die and then making an astonishing recovery is something which happens to a state, not to an individual.
Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
The "beast from the sea" sounds an awful lot like Abaddon, which rises from the Dead Sea after the seventh seal is broken. Or at least, that is what I've heard.
Which nation of our world today is composed of all seven of these sins? I would have to say the modern US.