All I've got to say is Muhammad ordered
all dogs to be killed, for ritual uncleanliness,
especially black dogs because they were demons. When people complained he said they were allowed for work. That sums up Islam and religion perfectly.
It's like when the pope said everyone is just waiting in the ground for Jesus to come back, then they'll finely get to go to heaven. However, people
didn't like that they had wasted so much time praying to saints who weren't in heaven yet, so the pope changed his mind. Muhammad was filth, most
popes have been filth, and everything about abrahamic religions are filth and should all be considered radical. For goodness sake, you all worship the
same alien, yet are hellbent on causing the end of the world, all self-fullfilling prophecy style, so you can have your 93rd Imam or Jesus' Second
Coming, if that's not radical nothing is.
Heck, you can't even agree on heaven and hell, the Jews say there is no physical hell, yet Christians see Heaven and hell as two separate places,
while some Muslim sects see virgins waiting for them if they throw their life away for some power hungry coward. There's nothing moderate or sane
about your religions at all, heck, Muslims can't even figure out if a woman must be covered, while some get killed for not being completely covered,
yet, "Only one verse refers to the veiling of women, stating that the Prophet's wives should
be behind a hijab when his male guests converse with them. Some modernists, however, claim that this does not apply to women in general, and that the
language used does not carry the textual stipulation that makes a verse obligatory." Women were first given more rights under Islam, yet now it's been
turned into a woman having to have several witnesses to a rape, if not, she gets stoned to death for being raped...moderate or radical?
Everytime you say Muhammad or Allah, you have to say may peace be upon him or some other nonsense...moderate or radical? You can't show a picture of
Muhammad (bomb head), even though this is not a real rule and he was depicted by Muslims until not too long ago, if you do you have a hit put on your
head, this also goes for portraying Islam differently (
The Satanic Verses) or speaking out
against it (
Theo van Gogh)...moderate or radical? "In mid-February 1989,
following a violent riot against the book in Pakistan, the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, Supreme Leader of Iran and a Shi'a Muslim scholar, issued a
fatwa calling on all good Muslims to kill Rushdie and his publishers, or to point him out to those who can kill him if they cannot themselves.” The
author never came to harm, but the Japanese translator was stabbed to death, the Italian translator almost died from a stabbing that happened the same
month, the publisher in Norway barely survived an assassination attempt, and the Turkish translator was the target of the Sivas Massacre.
There was a group of poets, musicians, and artists who were celebrating an Alevi, minority Muslim group, poet and the Turkish translator was also with
them.
So, “enraged fundamentalists surrounded the hotel, shouting 'Death to the infidel!' and
threatening the assembled artists with lynching. The hotel was set alight, and the fire claimed 35 lives, including those of musicians, poets,
tourists and hotel staff, while assembled police did nothing to intervene. Aziz Nesin was able to escape only because attackers initially failed to
recognize him. According to reports, when rescuers eventually realized his identity, he was beaten by firemen while a city councilman from the Welfare
Party shouted, 'This is the devil we should have really killed.'” What I'm getting at is, if you're a "moderate" Muslim, you're not really a classic
Muslim. You're the kind of Muslim like my Christian parents, when I point out absurdity that their religion demands they believe, they tell me they
don't believe that, but I tell them they have to to be Christian, but they just ignore the hard questions and remain ignorant and spiritually empty.
Here is a blog, by a Muslim, entitled How Islam Will
Dominate the World. Here are some quotes:
“It is he (Allah) who has sent his Messenger (saw) with guidance and the religion of truth, in order for it to be dominant over all other religions,
even though the Mushrikoon (disbelievers) hate it.” (EMQ at-Tawbah, 9: 33) - “Verily Allah has shown me the eastern and western part of the
earth, and I saw the authority of my Ummah (nation) dominate all that I saw.” (Saheeh Muslim, hadeeth #2889). "As Allah (swt) has said; this
religion (i.e. Islam) is the only religion of truth; and the reason why he has sent us this deen is “in order for it to be dominant over all other
religions.” Thus, Allah (swt) never sent us this deen as a mere spiritual belief. This deen has been sent to us by Almighty Allah (swt) in order for
it to be implemented and for the whole of mankind to abide by it. The only one who would hate for Islam to dominate the world is the Kaafir Mushrik
(non-Muslim), as Allah (swt) said, “…even though the Mushrikoon (disbelievers) hate it.” Consequently, any “Muslim” who dislikes for the
Sharee’ah to be implemented (out of being afraid to be labelled “extremist” for example) has committed a negation of Eemaan, and thus left the
fold of Islam for hating what Allah (swt) has revealed.
According to this person, if you don't support Shariah Law being implemented worldwide, likely with a global caliphate, even if you're afraid of being
labelled an extremist, you're not a real Muslim. Now let's see, what do they do to Muslims who are no longer Muslims, oh yeah, "The sentence for
apostasy, under Sharia law as traditionally interpreted, is execution, alternate amputation, or expulsion." Is that moderate? If you don't believe in
Jinn as a Muslim, then you're supposed to be executed, have a body part chopped off, or expelled from all Muslim countries. These Jinn are clearly
aliens, they have many similarities with the Fallen Angels, which are also clearly aliens. These Jinn also have many magical abilities and such too,
so if you don't believe in aliens with special abilities, you're supposed to be killed or have your arm chopped off. Now here are some more moderate
quotes:
“One of the greatest forms of kufr and shirk today is the implementation of man-made law; therefore, since man-made law is a form of shirk, one of
the only ways of eradicating it from the face of this earth is by (fighting). In fact, it is an obligation upon us to fight against the fitnah until
it ceases to exist. Islam has always been spread by the sword, and it will continue to do so.” “If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them
the (tax). If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah’s help and fight them.”
“So how will Islam dominate the world? Most likely by force! If the people do not embrace Islam and implement the Sharee’ah on their own accord,
it becomes an obligation upon the Muslims to fight and implement Islam. In countries such as Britain and America, their people have clearly rejected
to embrace Islam and will never choose to live by the Sharee’ah. Therefore, the only two ways in which these countries can become under the domain
of Islam is by the last two options, a group of Muslims rise and overthrow the government, or an Islamic state is established elsewhere and comes to
conquer these nations.” “Any person who mocks this concept of Islam dominating the world has one of the attributes of the Munaafiqeen and could
have committed one of the negations of Islam – disbelieving in the sayings of Allah and his Messenger.”
So if Muslims conquer a people, those people can convert to Islam, if they do not, they must pay a tax, if they do not pay the tax you are to murder
them all...moderate or radical? I have nothing against individual Muslims, but their religion is meant to keep them in the Middle Ages and keep them
oppressed through a political system that is tied directly into the strict religious system. Yet instead of fighting against your oppressive rulers
who purposely keep you poor and ignorant, you complain about Jews (even though they're Khazarians) and them stealing land that you had previously
stolen.
Here's a page about
Islamic Crusades and Imperialism...so tell
me, are Crusades and Imperialism moderate or radical? When Muhammad died they couldn't figure out if his number one follower or his son should fill
his seat, so this caused a civil war that still lasts to this day, all for a power struggle (the real agenda behind Islam and most religion) between
very unrighteous men, heck, the first several successors were murdered by other Muslims...moderate or radical? Now some quotes to finish it: From
Thomas Jefferson, "Difference of opinion is advantageous in religion. The several sects perform the office of a Censor - over each other." Steven
Weinberg says it best, “With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good
people to do evil things, that takes religion.” Here's our certainly not Christian Founding Fathers take, from Ben Franklin, “Lighthouses are more
useful than churches.” From John Adams, “This would be the best of all possible worlds if there were no religion in it!” And from Thomas
Jefferson, “Christianity is the most perverted system that ever shone on man.” From Edward Gibbon, “Religion is regarded by the common people as
true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful.”
edit on 13-6-2011 by SincerelySarcastic because: (no reason given)
Where does the setting sun go at night? According to the 'truthful' Qu'ran - He [i.e.
Zul-qarnain] followed, until he reached the setting of the sun. He found it set in a spring of murky water. - (Surah XVIII ( Kahf) vs. 85-86 So Allah
says the sun can be found at night in a spring of murky water.
