It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Tampa, Florida --Meet Joel Chandler, who just paid his $1.00 toll on the Polk Parkway with a $100 bill, he is not allowed to leave unless he provides personal info to the toll taker. The toll taker tells Chandler this is what happens when they get large bills. She says this is what they have to do.
Chandler says to the toll taker, "So I'm being detained?" She says yes sir.
It is a policy the Florida Turnpike authority instituted for people who paid with $20, $50 or $100 bills. After it happened once, Chandler kept testing the system and taped his encounters as he went through the to
Chandler says 87 percent of the times toll takers took the time to fill out the form as to why they stopped someone. It was a racial description like, young black male, young black male, young Hispanic male. Although FDOT refused to comment because the Department expects to be sued, internal e-mail justify the program because of counterfeit bills. However, in a 2 and a half year period the DOT got $16,000 in counterfeit bills, while at the same time it collected close to $2 billion in tolls ($1,523,825,404).
The Department also spent $32,000 on forms used to catch the $16,000 in funny money. The department also says in e-mails, the program will help law enforcement catch counterfeiters.
Originally posted by DimensionalDetective
Sig Hiel!
Originally posted by rogerstigers
reply to post by Aggie Man
Yeah, the problem is they *DON'T* send you the bill... They bill you, but apparently, it is your responsibility to go to their web site to see what you owe. I remember a case last year of some guy who ended up with a bill for several hundred dollars from NTTS because he never received a bill.
I kept my tolltag. I keep it in a closed case except for the rare times I decide to use the tollway for expediancy or convenience. I don't really trust the "Keep moving, we'll bill you" concept.
And the average speed concept was discussed, I believe, but the state legislature considered it unconstitutional.. memory is a bit foggy on that, though, so I might be wrong.edit on 3-5-2011 by rogerstigers because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Aggie Man
At least Floridians can still travel without big brother knowing where they are
Originally posted by Aggie Man
Also, One would think that if these damn red light cameras are allowed, then the average speed concept would be too.
Originally posted by DimensionalDetective
reply to post by Intelearthling
LOL, apologies for mis-spelling a barbaric scum-bag group's obedient catch-phrase.
And no, not having "correct change" in ANY way warrants folks being stopped, detained, and grilled for their personal info, just to travel from point A, to point B, which IS like Nazi Germany---"Your papers please." In a truely FREE society, this type of crap should NEVER happen---Period.
Originally posted by kosmicjack
No, there's still cameras every 2 or 3 hundred yards in many major metro areas. For instance, there's no way to leave ATL on a major road without being tracked via camera.
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by Aggie Man
Also, One would think that if these damn red light cameras are allowed, then the average speed concept would be too.
Except they can't prove it is YOU driving... for the toll the car gets billed, but for speeding it is the driver... so they would need a picture of the driver as well