It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
For the sake of those who died on 9/11, their families, the American people, and for the sake of peace in the world, please continue to seek the truth about 9/11. Demand a thorough and impartial reinvestigation of 9/11.
Patriots question 9/11
For the sake of those who died on 9/11, their families, the American people, and for the sake of peace in the world, please continue to seek the truth about 9/11
Like most issues...
...the corporate media and the establishment are avoiding the issues...
...and are instead attacking the messengers. ...
It began with a handful then grew to a few hundred now number in the thousands
In logic, an argumentum ad populum (Latin: "appeal to the people") is a fallacious argument that concludes a proposition to be true because many or all people believe it; it alleges: "If many believe so, it is so."
Current and former military, CIA, government officials, elected representatives, architects, engineers, pilots, professors, medical professionals, 9/11 survivors and family members
Argument from authority (also known as appeal to authority) is a fallacy of defective induction, where it is argued that a statement is correct because the statement is made by a person or source that is commonly regarded as authoritative. The most general structure of this argument is:
Critical thinking, in its broadest sense has been described as "purposeful reflective judgment concerning what to believe or what to do."
Critical thinking clarifies goals, examines assumptions, discerns hidden values, evaluates evidence, accomplishes actions, and assesses conclusions.
Originally posted by Akragon
The truth will never come out.... i think we've all learned that over the past 10 years.
Originally posted by psikeyhackr
Originally posted by Akragon
The truth will never come out.... i think we've all learned that over the past 10 years.
I do not know of anything else in history that involves defying the Laws of Physics.
Tunguska may be the closest thing.
www.youtube.com...
But there were no videos of that impact.
That is what is unique about 9/11. You do not build 1360 foot skyscrapers without figuring out how to distribute the steel. In 2000 I would not have expected a physicist to give a damn about skyscraper design because the physics is so trivial. But for NINE YEARS to pass and most of the physicists either won't discuss or won't ask about the distribution of steel but pretend that airliners less than 200 tons could TOTALLY OBLITERATE buildings 2000 times their mass in less than TWO HOURS!?!?!? EXCUSE ME!
How many years will have to go by before this becomes unacceptable in the profession? The longer it takes the more ridiculous they will look. We can't pretend that 500 years from now any of the politics will matter. It's grade school physics.
www.youtube.com...
We may not learn who but we should KNOW that airliners could not do that.
psik
Originally posted by Akragon
ya we all know this, but again...whos going to admit to planting explosives or thermite.
Powerful wealthy people don't get caught...
Originally posted by zimishey
anyone half sane, when they shut their eyes and think of 9/11, will see the crazies jumping up and down with glee and dribbling at the mouth, and high fiving, when the towers and pentagon were hit, went down. and their message was quickly transmitted worldwide through their media: 'The Terrorists Done it!!!'
Originally posted by rjh01a
Originally posted by psikeyhackr
Has some major engineering school publicly admitted that airliners could not destroy the towers?
Is the NIST good enough?
Originally posted by hooper
Originally posted by zimishey
anyone half sane, when they shut their eyes and think of 9/11, will see the crazies jumping up and down with glee and dribbling at the mouth, and high fiving, when the towers and pentagon were hit, went down. and their message was quickly transmitted worldwide through their media: 'The Terrorists Done it!!!'
Kind of agree there, particluarly about the "HALF sane" part. Anyone who is completely sane will dismiss the conspiracies as simply the product of semi-fertile minds trapped in ego-centric personalities.
LOL, I didn't mean it that way--, so you can have that one
I just feel you people who trust your leaders are very naive. I mean errrr ...you've familiar with cars salesmen, right
Originally posted by psikeyhackr
...but pretend that airliners less than 200 tons could TOTALLY OBLITERATE buildings 2000 times their mass in less than TWO HOURS!?!?!? EXCUSE ME!
Originally posted by FDNY343
Originally posted by psikeyhackr
...but pretend that airliners less than 200 tons could TOTALLY OBLITERATE buildings 2000 times their mass in less than TWO HOURS!?!?!? EXCUSE ME!
Stop intentionally misstating the facts. Nobody claims it was the impact. NOBODY.
Originally posted by iSunTzu
reply to post by psikeyhackr
The issue was solved. The patriots who question 911 have no evidence, and some of those named have no clue they are listed with those who make fake claims of thermite and more nonsense. It is simple to get a Pulitzer Prize. Take all the facts and evidence from the great minds at patriots question 911 and apply for the Pulitzer. They must have tons of evidence. Go for it.
Wait, after checking all the pages at patriotsquestion911.com... found no evidence. Put your Pulitzer Prize on eternal hold. The people listed, not patriots, uniformed people who can't figure out 911. Lucky those people were not on Flight 93, the Passengers who figured out 911 in minutes and took action, something the majority listed at the patriots question 911 have failed to do.
I should say — and I am not going to mince my words — that if you read this article, and reject everything in it, or reject it without bothering to read it, you are only proving how dead from the neck up you are, and how right the people behind 9/11 were to assume that most folk are a lot stupider and more gullible than they like to think, or have others think. If you can read this investigation of the Naudet film and think I am completely wrong and there is absolutely nothing of any value in any of it, you are an idiot : there is nothing else to be said. These folk are shoving their complicity right in your face, as clear as day, and if you still can't see it, even when I point it out to you, what else do you deserve to be called but an idiot ? This is not arrogance, but frustration at trying to get through to people I know have the intelligence to realise there is a case to answer, but for some reason refuse to accept it. There is a direct correlation between paying attention to this article and making the perpetrators of 9/11 uncomfortable, and I am not remotely surprised that after eight years of you wasting your time on irrelevant nonsense, they are all quite comfy, thank you very much — not anticipating seeing the inside of a jail cell in the next few decades. Ignore this article, and you're making sure they don't.