It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Exclusive: NASA Scientist Claims Evidence of Alien Life on Meteorite

page: 3
23
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 5 2011 @ 05:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by Draken
The same way and reason we find fossils DEEP in our rocks. They are old life that has been covered up over millions of years of time. The reason fossils normally survive is because they were in some perfect situation that preserved them.


And then got blasted of Mars to land here in Antarctica...


But yeah there are likely fossil bugs all over the universe, I just don't trust NASA's 'scientific' methods


Especially when NASA scientists can't even agree amongst themselves

NASA says...


Dr. David Marais, an astrobiologist with NASA’s AMES Research Center, says he’s very cautious about jumping onto the bandwagon. These kinds of claims have been made before, he noted -- and found to be false. “It’s an extraordinary claim, and thus I’ll need extraordinary evidence,” Marais said.


www.foxnews.com...

If this fossil bug was so obvious, then I would expect anyone looking could produce the same results'

I will wait and see how this one plays out
edit on 5-3-2011 by zorgon because: (no reason given)




posted on Mar, 5 2011 @ 05:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by Versa[/


ok so that is a photograph you have taken and not touched in any way whatsoever?

i never made either of those statements nor will i continue this pointless conversation. if you want to cover new ground and discuss the life forms on the meteorite i will be happy to continue. thanks



posted on Mar, 5 2011 @ 06:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by debris765nju

Originally posted by Versa


ok so that is a photograph you have taken and not touched in any way whatsoever?



Originally posted by debris765nju
i never made either of those statements nor will i continue this pointless conversation. if you want to cover new ground and discuss the life forms on the meteorite i will be happy to continue. thanks


OK....

So you expect anyone to believe that this image



became this image



and all you did was? what? repost it? At no point you adjusted the image in any way whatsoever?
edit on 5-3-2011 by Versa because: (no reason given)

edit on 5-3-2011 by Versa because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 5 2011 @ 09:08 PM
link   
reply to post by Versa
 


no, those are two different photographs, this is the photograph that i developed the 'colorful' derivative from.. the purpose was to show that there was no essential differentiation pf the entities within the pupa (the white worm-like sac) and the entities on the outside of the sac,,,ergo it was a subterfuge (distraction)

to prove that this was just one of the options at my disposal, i highlighted several entities within the pupa, it also is not the only option. these entities vary in size from sub-atomic to inter-galactic.

they are intelligent, communal and are the universe....quite literally



posted on Mar, 5 2011 @ 09:09 PM
link   
Maybe ATS is starting to change me because to this thread I say ::: What else is new?

These announcements seems like just a way to wet the appetite of the public, and justify the millions of dollars that they waste. Now I love astronomy, and I definately agree that money should be spent on space exploration.
I also however read article after article of NASA being in shocked, shocked, or stumped on things.
I also know that alot of money for funding is being cut due to the commercialism of space exploration. They want to spend more money on the rockets to take the public up to space to give them a 7th grade astronomy lessons rather then spending the money on projects that have already been started.



posted on Mar, 5 2011 @ 09:19 PM
link   
Here is a link to the actual journal entry.

Fossils of Cyanobacteria in CI1 Carbonaceous Meteorites



posted on Mar, 5 2011 @ 10:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by debris765nju


photo credit; journal of cosmology

If you had pointed to this image i posted on page 2 then you would have been correct....they are in fact the same photograph though not the same image,

you seem to have a problem understanding that different developemental techniques are used to highlight different facets of an image. this post is not geared to you but to a wide spectrum of professional people seeking evidence concerning possible life other than that generated on earth.

in a broader sense it opens the field of discussion for the possible seeding of life on earth from other planets.



posted on Mar, 5 2011 @ 10:36 PM
link   
anybody here ever read Deception Point by Dan Brown? The plot is almost exactly like this story. Posted in other thread too



posted on Mar, 5 2011 @ 11:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by debris765nju

reply to post by Versa
 


no, those are two different photographs, this is the photograph that i developed the 'colorful' derivative from.. the purpose was to show that there was no essential differentiation pf the entities within the pupa (the white worm-like sac) and the entities on the outside of the sac,,,ergo it was a subterfuge (distraction)

to prove that this was just one of the options at my disposal, i highlighted several entities within the pupa, it also is not the only option. these entities vary in size from sub-atomic to inter-galactic.

they are intelligent, communal and are the universe....quite literally


This particular photo is not the "alien" bug .. this is a photo what they say the alien bug closely resembles ... this may be known but considering this one is being manipulated and analyzed by people I'm assuming not.. if you read around you'll find that, this particular article used this photo and only this photo which is misleading.



posted on Mar, 5 2011 @ 11:29 PM
link   
Aliens according to Prophet Mohammed (SAW) :

www.almondcity.com...



posted on Mar, 5 2011 @ 11:41 PM
link   
I'm split:

The bad:
A more respected scientific news source than the “Journal of Cosmology” would have been preferable for publication of this research.
There was no peer review before publication, which would have lent the findings a lot more credence.
Evidence similar to this has been debunked in the past.
Any research from NASA scientists needs to be met with skepticism. They are hungry for relevance and funding, after all.

The good:
Dr. Hoover seems to have excellent credentials, and his findings appear grounded in research, not personal belief. I couldn't find evidence that he's cried wolf on this topic before.
There appears to be complete sunshine on the findings and evidence, with an open call for peer review.
The findings of Dr. Hoover’s peers, whether they back him up or tear his research apart, will be available for all to see.

Skepticism is absolutely needed here, but I'm leaning toward believing this. I think the “Journal of Cosmology” couldn't hold its load before other scientists could look at Hoover's research, and went with what they had now because it's sexy, headline-grabbing news. Imprudent, but their promise to publish other scientists' reports March 7-10 makes me hopeful that it's solid.

Looking forward to what other scientists say.



posted on Mar, 5 2011 @ 11:44 PM
link   
zorgon: Cool Story Bro


This is either big news or disappointing confusion over something big. I'm hoping for big news. Will keep watch on this.



posted on Mar, 6 2011 @ 12:03 AM
link   
I am note sure if any evidence has yet been presented, on this particular meteorite, that would rule out the possibility that its origin is Earth. Anyone know?

That is, if certain things can occur on Mars that would result in the ejection of rock masses large enough to survive entry into Earth's atmosphere...then is it not possible that such a rock mass could be ejected from somewhere on Earth, only to eventually fall back. It would then undergo the same stresses, heat, etc. that any other extraterrestrial rock would on re-entry.

Perhaps the explosion of a super-volcano would have the right stuff...or the impact of a large asteroid or comet (as has happened in our past) would have the energy required to blast large-ish chunks of Earth into space.

So, I suppose it would have to be a two-step process. First, is it...or is it not...certain evidence of a deceased life form? Second, is it certain that this is not a "home grown" meteorite?



posted on Mar, 6 2011 @ 12:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by FOXMULDER147
Here is a link to the actual journal entry.
Fossils of Cyanobacteria in CI1 Carbonaceous Meteorites


Really odd... this isn't NEW... seems he already published a paper on this in 2006

Comets, carbonaceous meteorites, and the origin of the biosphere PDF
R. B. Hoover
Astrobiology Laboratory, NASA/National Space Science and Technology Center, USA
Received: 24 October 2005 – Accepted: 21 November 2005 – Published: 27 January 2006

www.biogeosciences-discuss.net...

Very odd indeed...



posted on Mar, 6 2011 @ 12:58 AM
link   
This is HUGE! Disclosure right around the corner!



posted on Mar, 6 2011 @ 01:26 AM
link   
reply to post by galactictuan
 


Disclosure about lichen seems unnecessary.



posted on Mar, 6 2011 @ 01:29 AM
link   
reply to post by debris765nju
 


Im not versed in xenobiology, but I didnt think the image was a pupae. I thought the article said bacteria.



posted on Mar, 6 2011 @ 09:42 AM
link   

Originally posted by debris765nju

reply to post by MrDetective
 


interesting, i found the lifeform much more complex than the original presented on fox news network.but that is just my opinion.
edit on 023131p://pm3149 by debris765nju because: to add photo


Is that a pixelated version of this?:




posted on Mar, 6 2011 @ 09:54 AM
link   
This has been reported on the Australian yahoo site as well, so they seem to be putting it out there. There seems to be alot of Alien stuff going on hey?



posted on Mar, 6 2011 @ 11:09 AM
link   

Originally posted by zorgon

Originally posted by FOXMULDER147
Here is a link to the actual journal entry.
Fossils of Cyanobacteria in CI1 Carbonaceous Meteorites


Really odd... this isn't NEW... seems he already published a paper on this in 2006

www.biogeosciences-discuss.net...

Very odd indeed...

They are not the same paper. He's been working on the subject for a long time.

100 scientists have been asked to peer review this latest paper, and the responses are going to be published on the Journal of Cosmology website from tomorrow onwards. If there is a consensus of agreement it will provide the ground for a historic official announcement. Just bugs, but still... aliens will be real.

www.guardian.co.uk...



new topics

top topics



 
23
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join