I Don't Understand..., page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times
Topic started on 4-3-2011 @ 05:30 PM by budski
I Don't Understand the animosity, the spewing of bile, the utter contempt.

Political division is a consequence of politics.

Hatred is a conseqeunce of people.

When did it become about the individual, and not about society?

After WW2, my government had the vision of social fairness, equality, free education and medical care - nobody moaned about it, or cried about "their money, and I aint subsidizing (name your group) or was at all concerned about anything but making our country better.

That's not a bad idea or ideal - yes, it has a touch of socialism, and that's not a bad thing either.

At the same time, my country is a tiny little island, with a disproportionate amount of power, thanks largely to the fact that we raped the known world for a few hundred years - but so did Spain, France and Holland, not to mention Germany.

The problem is that it is no longer acceptable to rape the known world - some people accept that, and some people say "sod it, I pay war taxes, might as well use them"

Understand, that the US and UK fighting in foreign countries, stealing resources, and getting rich has consequences - and they ike it that way, because that gives them an excuse to demand more of the public milk.

Imagine that amount of money being spent for the good of all, on a social basis - or even half that money...

That would also generate work, jobs and stimulate the economy - and actually do some good at the same time.

All parties need to stop bickering, and work together for the greater good, rather than their own - and that goes for people, local authorities, governments, the UN, every single body.

Until people can come together, work together and create for the common good, we will always see war of one sort or another.

And it shouldn't make a difference what your political affiliation is - it's about humans, all of us, not just when it suits us.
edit on 4/3/2011 by budski because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 4-3-2011 @ 05:47 PM by budski
reply to post by woodwardjnr



I understand your point, but I would argue that it is when times are GOOD that we turn against each other - during war we pull together.

Maybe that's what "They" were counting on...



reply posted on 4-3-2011 @ 05:53 PM by budski
reply to post by Silk



Very true...

My argument is that until we can move past base/selfish thoughts and desires as a species, we are more or less doomed.

edit on 4/3/2011 by budski because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 4-3-2011 @ 05:56 PM by Silk
reply to post by budski



Doom of a society possibly - but perhaps not as a species. When looking at this issue I tend to think macro rather than Micro. The Roman Empire fell but humanity persisted - and if we can get past the right barriers humanity has infinite possibilities.


reply posted on 4-3-2011 @ 05:59 PM by budski
Originally posted by Silk
reply to
post by budski



Doom of a society possibly - but perhaps not as a species. When looking at this issue I tend to think macro rather than Micro. The Roman Empire fell but humanity persisted - and if we can get past the right barriers humanity has infinite possibilities.


The Roman Empire didn't have the capability to destroy the planet.

And the barriers are the way we live - we need a total shift on thoughts, motivation and self on a non-selfish level.

Until we can work together, we are doomed.


reply posted on 4-3-2011 @ 06:06 PM by woodwardjnr
reply to post by budski



I would say we have been encouraged to have extrinsic values ever since the days of Thatcherism. " No such thing as society" and the yuppie culture maybe had an effect on what we currently see? I dont know but i see a change that I dont like.


reply posted on 4-3-2011 @ 06:09 PM by budski
reply to post by woodwardjnr



Personally, I think this has been happening since WW1 - then WW" brought about even more reconstruction, and it snowballed from there.

Truth is, imo, war makes money and perhaps more importantly, power, for some people and that's why we find ourselves where we are.

Make no mistake, WW2 is still going on in many ways and on many levels...

edit on 4/3/2011 by budski because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 4-3-2011 @ 06:12 PM by Silk
reply to post by budski



I would argue that the fall of the Roman Empire did destroy the planet - or rather the evolution of the known world - at that point in time. However humans are a resilient species and we adapt and over come.

To view humans as suicidal and our ability to effect the extinction of our species in the light of the last 30 years is to ignore our potential under MAD to actually achieve that in less than the time it takes to write this post - therefore in my book there is the ability of humanity to overcome its petty differences and survive.

I would direct you to the events of the Cuban Missile Crises - more especially to the Pentagon Papers to see how close a difference in ideology can bring us to the brink of total annihilation - and just how the human spirit can prevae and change what might have been a significant course of action.


reply posted on 4-3-2011 @ 06:14 PM by budski
reply to post by Amaterasu



I think you are spot on about "ism"

I sometimes think that "ism" is just another way to divide us, even while they ram PC down our necks.

PC has its points, but it highlights differences rather than similarities.

We're all the same - and the pursuit of things is going to destroy us...



reply posted on 4-3-2011 @ 06:51 PM by Amaterasu
reply to post by budski



Glad you agree, budski. I abhor teamism, partyism, statism, etc.ism. Humans are a beautiful species yoked by money, and I have spent my life trying to find a solution to the problems we see as Humanity. I think I have it.

Thus The End of Entropy and the Ethical Planetarian Party. [smile]
edit on 3/4/2011 by Amaterasu because: typo



reply posted on 4-3-2011 @ 07:02 PM by randyvs
reply to post by Amaterasu





Humanity is twisted by its yoke of money, but Humanity freed would blossom. Let's give it a chance.


Well if it were up to us, it prolly would have been realised a long time ago. ET? You won't ever get anywhere with
that. Like you've shot yourself in the foot, right out of the gate. You have to get real first.


reply posted on 4-3-2011 @ 07:12 PM by Amaterasu
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to
post by Amaterasu





Humanity is twisted by its yoke of money, but Humanity freed would blossom. Let's give it a chance.


Well if it were up to us, it prolly would have been realised a long time ago. ET? You won't ever get anywhere with
that. Like you've shot yourself in the foot, right out of the gate. You have to get real first.


ET not withstanding, read what I offer. I think the Sumerian tablets are an awesome source to suggest ET involvement, BTW, but you don't have to believe in ET to bring a better world into being.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



A Dictator Is The Solution.
  Posted 1 days ago with 15 member flags
The Internet as a case study of Socialism
  Posted 19 days ago with 7 member flags
Why the need for Constant Growth?
  Posted 5 days ago with 7 member flags
Real Socialists. The Friends Of The Conservatives.
  Posted 15 days ago with 6 member flags
The Greenbay Packer\'s Prove That Socialism Works.
  Posted 19 days ago with 5 member flags
On What Date Did Human Freedom End?
  Posted 15 days ago with 5 member flags