It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Adolf Hitler -- Agent of Zionism and Freemasonry

page: 4
8
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 28 2011 @ 01:51 PM
link   


Hitler was just a stooge of the Ashkenazi people, or "Jews" they successfully made the west to belive.
AH real causes and reasons of execution of the Jews is as horrendous as insidious because they were the only ones who knew the truth about the people of Ashkenazi origin and plans.
Hitler Identified jews as enemies of the true "Aryan" race, a great lie wich is now unvealing
These ashkenazi with Hitler wanted to unified europe in the sami fashion as Charlemagne
NWO is ashkenazi !




The Zionists [white ashkenazi europeans] are promoting a sort of watered down "pro europe" right-wing image, even here in the U.S. where I live.
This is a very similar campaign to the one Hitler promoted, even though Hitler was against them.
Hitler was "pro aryan" not "pro white ashkenazi". The other poster is correct when he says the Italians, Brits, and Germans are all kissing cousins. They are racist, yes, but they are not exactly racist in the same way Hitler was. Hitler thought the nordic people to be the master race.
Interestingly that the scandinavian nordic people were not even considered Europeans during the early period of King Charlegmagne's rule. Which is the reason why he conquered them and killed many of them. Because the French/Italians/Swiss [pick your country] saw them as enemies and a threat to their power! Therefore, these modern "white ashkenazis" are more like Charlemagne in attitude, not like Hitler. In fact, Hitler correctly identified them as enemies of the true "aryan" race. These ashkenazis want a unified europe in the same fashion as Charlemagne did.
The Jewsteins, Jewroths, Jewgolds, Jewblooms, Jewbaums, Jewitzs, Jewskys, Jewbergs, & Jewmans are simply doing what the bulk of Europeans Jews do - subvert the world. No surprise here.



This particular ethnic [ashkenazi] group has got it in for Judaism ever since they've adopted the religion.
Make no mistake folks, They ARE a race of their own - they have their own genetic diseases ie (Tay-Sachs). non-ashkenazi jews are humiliated each time one of these mouthy bastards air their thoughts about Judaism through the airwaves.
It's as if they think they own it and it revolves around them. They are in an existential crisis because no one wants them and are looking for acceptance. THEY coined the term "Anti-semitism".

THEY [ashkenazi] made Judiasm into a race when in fact it's a nation and converts are most certainly welcomed by God, even more so according to the Torah.
The ashkenazim have corrolated Judaism with money!
THEY [ashkenazi] are the ones who put a DNA on the religion. Look at the way they treat Arab Jews and other fellow Jews of color. These prostitutes of Judaism also suffer from holocaust syndrome. Just look at the way they shamelessly exploit it. Ethnic AshkeNAZI Israel is incapable of making peace with the Arabs due to their racist views. More proof of why Judaism has been hijacked by Ashkenazi supremacy. Fortunately, the world is waking up now and the thing about the ashkenazi fear most is that the truth about their history and plans to be revealed.
The truth has arrived and it is not pretty!!!





posted on Apr, 1 2011 @ 09:26 PM
link   
^^^^This is a spot on answer!! In a nut shell everything NOT in the history book's in the US school's.



posted on Apr, 1 2011 @ 10:27 PM
link   
reply to post by Qrcusilex
 


That's an interesting theory.

Would you say that your view on Ashkenazism (Khazarians?) in relation to Judaism is at all reconcilable with Samael Aun Weor's (who wrote that Adolf Hitler was an Initiate of the Black Lodge) view of Zionism, as explained in the following excerpt from the book titled The Major Mysteries, which is found within the following link?



"Regrettably, the people chosen by the Prophets of Judah failed and the entire humanity sank into the abyss."

"This is how the people of the Prophets of Judah crucified their promised Messiah - Christ; this is how their people, the nation of Israel, failed. This is how the people that had been chosen by the Prophets of Judah in order to spread the Christic wisdom upon the entire face of the earth chose the abyss. Now, that nation follows Javhe and totally failed its Prophets, because such a nation betrayed its Master and crucified him. If the Lord had not been crucified, the destiny of the Western world would have been another; we would now have sublime enlightened Rabbis everywhere, preaching the Christic Esotericism.

"Christic Esotericism, the secret Jewish Kabbalah, and the Holy Alchemy united would have completely illuminated and transformed the entire world. Yes, the mysteries of Levi would have shone with the Light of Christ. Gnosis (Daath) would have magnificently shone everywhere. Then, the world would not have fallen into the dead Christianity of Roman Catholicism. Then, we would have been saved from the horrible darkness of the Dark Age (Kali Yuga)...."

– Samael Aun Weor


Although Charlemagne wouldn't have been of the Black Lodge; because according to the White Lodge Initiate Manly P. Hall, Charlemagne was a Gnostic Initiate (see the following link):



Orders of the Quest by Manly P. Hall 33°


(In the above book it is implied that Charlemagne was Roman Catholic by name only, yet Gnostic at Heart.)

Now even though it is said that Charlemagne gave Jews (including Ashkenazi's) certain freedoms, it does not seem that Charlemagne was directly influenced by them.



edit on 1-4-2011 by Tamahu because: punctuation



posted on Apr, 2 2011 @ 03:12 AM
link   
The Rothschilds claim that they are Jewish, when in fact they are Khazars. They are from a country called Khazaria, which occupied the land locked between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea which is now predominantly occupied by Georgia. The reason the Rothschilds claim to be Jewish is that the Khazars, or as they like to be known Ashkenazi Jews, under the instruction of the King, converted to the Jewish faith in 740 A.D.

"I know thy works, and tribulation and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan."

But you cannot blame the actions of the Rothschilds family on ALL Ashkenazi jews.

With regard to Hitler, there is a story that the Rothschilds had not only legitimate children to carry on the bloodline and their banking empire, but also pruduced some secret children, who could be placed in posistion of power, or used as spies, this is just a story, there is no proof of this.

And this is where the Hitler story comes from, someone traced a member of hitlers family to have worked at a Rothschilds country house, the story then goes that Hitler is therefore a secret Rothschilds child, again no hard proof of any of this.

If there was hard proof, it would of been buried long ago.



posted on Apr, 4 2011 @ 01:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by Tamahu

reply to post by Qrcusilex
 



"Regrettably, the people chosen by the Prophets of Judah failed and the entire humanity sank into the abyss."

"This is how the people of the Prophets of Judah crucified their promised Messiah - Christ; this is how their people, the nation of Israel, failed. This is how the people that had been chosen by the Prophets of Judah in order to spread the Christic wisdom upon the entire face of the earth chose the abyss. Now, that nation follows Javhe and totally failed its Prophets, because such a nation betrayed its Master and crucified him. If the Lord had not been crucified, the destiny of the Western world would have been another; we would now have sublime enlightened Rabbis everywhere, preaching the Christic Esotericism.

"Christic Esotericism, the secret Jewish Kabbalah, and the Holy Alchemy united would have completely illuminated and transformed the entire world. Yes, the mysteries of Levi would have shone with the Light of Christ. Gnosis (Daath) would have magnificently shone everywhere. Then, the world would not have fallen into the dead Christianity of Roman Catholicism. Then, we would have been saved from the horrible darkness of the Dark Age (Kali Yuga)...."

– Samael Aun Weor



Having read my way through a number of Weor's books which are available online on: gnosticteachings.org... I must conclude that he had a completely ahistorical view of the Jesus of the Gospels (not that the fabricated New Testament is a historical document anyway), though certainly what Weor and the prophets of the Biblical deity had in common was an extreme hatred of human nature and a belief in sex slavery (marriage), polygamy (one male with more than one female partner), homophobia and in spouting endless ramblings of religious sophistry.

The Jesus described in the Gospels was a religious schizophrenic who was one of many individals of that era who claimed to be the Messiah (a king, a dictator), and was obviously a fake healer (unless you believe that an illiterate first century exorcist discovered a cure for leprosy and blindness) and magician (stage magic and religion being entwined in those days) who promoted strict adherence to the letter of the Judaic Law, which would have genocidal consequences for humankind; thus if such a person were ever to appear again, I would have no problem with calling for his swift execution, though with regards to the scorging (ripping his skin off) and crucifixion, since I am opposed to the use of torture, I would have problems with that; however those who promote genocidal religious bigotry have only themselves to blame if they are responded to with violence.

I did read through Weor's ridiculous rambling commentary on the Book of Revelation on: gnosticteachings.org... however the Christ of the Second Coming is depicted as a global genocidal dictator who initiates a war in which most of the world's population dies and who eradicates all non believers; sounds a lot like the Nazis or their successors, the US Neofascist state terrorists

Those who promote the diabolical, genocidal religious fanaticism of the Biblical faith and the Biblical god are morally subhuman in my judgement and unworthy of life, though unfortunately such a nuclear and apocalyptic war between Christianity and Islam seems to be almost inevitable.

Lux

edit on 4-4-2011 by Lucifer777 because: Formatting



posted on Apr, 4 2011 @ 09:45 AM
link   
The internet crashed for a second and I've lost over half an hour of typing and I don't have time to retype it all, so my reply will be short.

"Lucifer", how are you coming to your conclusions here?

First of all, Samael Aun Weor is anti-fascist and is also anti-corporatist.

And there is nothing in The Aquarian Message about "believers" or a "global genocidal dictator".

The Book of Revelation is an Esoteric treatise on Karmamudra in relation to Kundalini Yoga.

There are also prophecies within the The Book of Revelation, however I would encourage anyone who is reading this to read The Aquarian Message for themselves, in order to see for themselves the context of the said prophecies.



edit on 4-4-2011 by Tamahu because: added link



posted on Apr, 4 2011 @ 01:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by Tamahu

The internet crashed for a second and I've lost over half an hour of typing and I don't have time to retype it all, so my reply will be short.


It happens.



"Lucifer", how are you coming to your conclusions here?

First of all, Samael Aun Weor is anti-fascist and is also anti-corporatist.

And there is nothing in The Aquarian Message about "believers" or a "global genocidal dictator".

The Book of Revelation is an Esoteric treatise on Karmamudra in relation to Kundalini Yoga.

There are also prophecies within the The Book of Revelation, however I would encourage anyone who is reading this to read The Aquarian Message for themselves, in order to see for themselves the context of the said prophecies.



edit on 4-4-2011 by Tamahu because: added link


I do concede that Samael was a Christian Socialist and was influenced by the Latin American Liberation Theologians; I consider this to be progressive and positive.

That has nothing to do with my criticisms of his paternalistic, homophobic ideology which considers erotic freedom to be demonic; I take an entirely contrary position to that, as probably would Crowley, all Thelemites, Anarchists and humanists.

Lux



posted on Apr, 6 2011 @ 04:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by Tamahu


"Whosoever calls you Thelemites will not commit any injustice so long as he knows the word with perfection."


Please refer to this post.



Snce above is a quotation from Samael Aun Weor whose moral philosophy is entirely antithetical (the opposite idea) to that of Thelemic philosophy, I consider his use of the term "Thelema" to be the kind of "Doublespeak" which religious fanatics use when they use terms such as "love" to refer to their bigoted behaviour or their "human-nature-hating" god.

I have already responded to this on the thread: "On the Kabbalah. On Esoteric “Secrets.” A Luciferian Perspective." on: www.abovetopsecret.com...


Originally posted by Lucifer777

Originally posted by Tamahu

Anyhow, Samael Aun Weor wrote that the intellect is indeed a valuable thing when it is in service of the Spirit through Meditation; and that the Gnostic should study art, music, science, mathematics, etc. It is also taught that Meditation is the Way that the Thelemite Does What They Wilt (this is related to the First Law that was mentioned in my previous post). How can we do the Will of our Being, if we are not able to shut off (so to speak) our noisy minds in order to hear The Voice of the Silence?


Thelemic philosophy is very simple to understand; in terms of human ethics (which is essentially moral philosophy; i.e., the question of "What is good and what is evil?" and "How should be treat each other"), it is really no different at all to humanist ethics, and is simply an extension of Nietzsche's ethics, which involves the abandonment of "slave morality" and the sins of restriction. For Weor to claim to be a Thelemite is no different to "St. Augustine's proclamation of "Love, and do what thou wilt;” it is simply doublespeak since, in common with the Catholics, he promoted numerous "sins of restriction" which are essentially restrictions on human behaviour. With regards to "erotic" behaviour there is simply no restriction on erotic behaviours in Thelemic philosophy which involve consensual relationships; the violation of the free will of another being the only real restriction, however Weor's "sexual morality" is essentially no different to Catholic sexual morality.
.......

The comparison between Weor's Gnostic morality and Catholic morality is quite clear; both involve a human-nature-hating morality and promote similar "sins of restriction," teaching against homosexuality, contraception, abortion and human erotic freedom and promoting the sexual enslavement of the female in order to allegedly become more divine (godlike), however since the Catholic definition of a deity is one that despises human nature and human erotic freedom, from a Thelemic perspective this concept of "divine" is simply doublespeak, since it produces a person who emulates such human-nature-hating qualities, and who often considers themselves "superior" to those who live according to their natural will; it produces an arrogant and demonic priest essentially.

In Thelemic terms where there "No god but man (and woman)," the Catholic view and Samael's view of "divine" includes an intense hatred of human nature and is "anti-natural" and thus "ungodly" from a Thelemic perspective; it simply produces a hypnotised, indoctrinated slave who has a fear and loathing regarding human nature.

As far as I am concerned, there is no transcendental being to become "one" with or to "love;" there are only the gods and goddesses (i.e., human beings) to love and to be loved by.

The religious fanatics are all ultimately subject to "my" judgement and to human judgement, not the judgement of an imaginary transcendental (up above) being; there is no-thing above us but the sky and the universe; it is "I" who am the judge of this imaginary transcendental being who is nothing more than an anthropomorphic projection of human consciousness; and thus the judgement upon God is ultimately a judgement upon the "men of God" and the fanatics of religion.

Lucifer

"The foundation of irreligious criticism is: Man makes religion, religion does not make man.

Religion is indeed the self-consciousness and self-esteem of man who has either not yet won through to himself or has already lost himself again. But man is no abstract being squatting outside the world. Man is the world of man, state, society. This state and this society produce religion, which is an inverted consciousness of the world, because they are an inverted world. Religion is the general theory of this world, its encyclopaedic compendium, its logic in popular form, its spiritual point d’honneur, its enthusiasm, its moral sanction, its solemn complement and its universal basis of consolation and justification. It is the fantastic realization of the human essence since the human essence has not acquired any true reality. The struggle against religion is therefore indirectly the struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion.

Religious suffering is at one and the same time the expression of real suffering and a protest against real suffering. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people.
" Karl Marx, "Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. "



posted on Apr, 13 2011 @ 01:12 PM
link   
It seems that Hitler was put in place to weaken Europe and to bring about the EU.



posted on Apr, 17 2011 @ 02:15 PM
link   
Exactly. The Investment banking Jewish family of the Rothschilds were in power in Germany at least 100 years before WW2.



posted on Apr, 28 2011 @ 01:49 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Oct, 11 2011 @ 01:19 PM
link   
In 1938 Hitler was still trying to win over America. What evidence is there that these people were in close contact with Hitler, yet alone guiding him?



posted on Oct, 12 2011 @ 06:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by Cassius666
In 1938 Hitler was still trying to win over America. What evidence is there that these people were in close contact with Hitler, yet alone guiding him?


No one was really in close contact with Hitler, at that time or even later. Contact with Hitler could only be accomplished by going through those who were closest to him. Those people changed over time, and particularly over the course of the war. In 1938, Goering was courting the US, through various intermediaries, as was Goebbels. Hitler could care less about the US, but supported the idea that most of the US's technical and industrial expertise originated in Germany, and therefore belonged, inherently, to Germany.

In terms of the Zionists, they supported Germany's intention to expel the Jews, especially if those Jews could be directed towards re-settlement in Israel. Eichmann and Heydrich were given free reign to accomplish Jewish resettlement, and had Hitler's authority to achieve that by any means necessary. Both worked very closely with the Israelis partisan and militant groups, even providing training facilities so that they could be pre-trained in insurgency tactics, before being dispatched to Israel under escort of the Abwehr.

Hitler merely had visions and ideas which he commanded others to realise. He seldom wanted to know how those objectives were to be achieved. His 'underlings' with perhaps some exceptions were young and naive, given incredible powers, and the directive of 'by any means necessary'. It led to their corruption both from the inside and from greater powers who wished to manipulate the situation to their own political ends. But, no, Hitler was not controlled by Zionists, not directly anyway.



new topics

top topics



 
8
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join