reply to post by TrueAmerican
To summarize the evidence you linked to:
1. The flight data recorder (FDR) is not in an American Airlines format.
2. The flight deck door was never reported as being open to FDR.
3. There was a severe mismatch in coordinates that should have grounded the flight.
4. The flight data recorder lists the GPS as operational when American Airlines did not have any GPS units at that time on any of their craft.
5. An "auto-alignment" was done on the aircraft according to the FDR. American Airlines airlines flights however did not have that capability at the
All five points are strong evidence that the flight that hit the Pentagon (assuming it actually did hit) was a military plane or another type of
plane... pretty much anything other than an American Airlines flight.
The resident "debunkers" (Hooper, Dereks, etc) totally ignored every single one of these points, except for Dereks who essentially said "nuh-uh"
without any explanation whatsoever regarding the flight deck door on page one. I can't imagine how Dereks could expect people to believe his idea
without a shred of evidence. The way the way virtually every single point made is entirely ignored makes "debunkers" a total embarrassment on these
forums... they really come off as totally ignorant and also total space-cases the way one thing is said and they go immediately off on their own
tangent. Every now and then when Hooper, Dereks, etc do such an awful job of "debunking" I actually try to help them out a little... but how could I
in this case.
AA planes DID NOT HAVE GPS, DID NOT HAVE AUTO-ALIGN, AND DO CANCEL MISALIGNED FLIGHTS. Dereks, how can I help you out here? Ever change your mind when
you're obviously wrong to a downright embarrassing degree?
Derek says: "So you find the truth boring, prefering the silly truther conspiracy theories - it appears that the truther story of the week is back to
mini nukes, beam weapons and holographic planes!"
Does this sentence address point #1 Derek? No.
Does this sentence address point #2 Derek? No.
Does this sentence address point #3 Derek? No.
Does this sentence address point #4 Derek? No.
Does this sentence address point #5 Derek? No.
Hooper Says: "Oh well, what are you gonna do, huh? I guess we'll just never be allowed to be a part of Europe. I'll just have to cry myself to sleep
Does this sentence address point #1 Hooper? No.
Does this sentence address point #2 Hooper? No.
Does this sentence address point #3 Hooper? No.
Does this sentence address point #4 Hooper? No.
Does this sentence address point #5 Hooper? No.
My message to Hooper, Dereks, and anybody else who does not accept these five findings by P4T is to put up or shut up. Is standard practice for a
skeptic to totally ignore all the evidence when it doesn't fit your side of the story? Well its not supposed to be that way... you're supposed to look
at each claim and evaluate it. This is an amazing bunch of claims by P4T... a collective of professionals that carries a lot of weight. If you choose
to ignore it, you make an embarrassment of your selves and even ATS which is supposed to consist in big part of intelligent debate about complex
conspiracy... not random jabs back and forth that are completely unrelated to the OP.
edit on 4-3-2011 by civilchallenger because: (no reason