Overwhelming Evidence Pentagon Aircraft Data Is Not From An American Airlines 757, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 83 times


reply posted on 4-3-2011 @ 10:57 AM by network dude
reply to post by rogerstigers



in this thread www.abovetopsecret.com... towards the end, there is a link to some of the camera footage. A few I had not seen before. For me, it gave me more questions than answers, but it did help.
I just wish that people wouldn't automatically turn aggressive on this forum, but I guess that's the nature of the beast.

edit to add:

Here is that site: Judicialwatch
edit on 4-3-2011 by network dude because: added link



reply posted on 4-3-2011 @ 10:58 AM by Hessdalen
reply to post by hooper



I'll just have to cry myself to sleep again tonight.


just as an example for the value system and moral standart of the US...


reply posted on 4-3-2011 @ 11:07 AM by weedwhacker
reply to post by TrueAmerican



Ladies and gentlemen, and the OP, TA.....for those of you who still suckle at the teat of PffffT....you have been conned, again.

I see (and smell) an act of desperation, on the part of Rob Balsamo (or, a low bank account....).

Because, as usual with that merry band of clowns, they (HE) twist and skew the technical details, in order to confuse the lay public, and try to advance their ridiculous, unwarranted, proven false claims. It is the ONLY way to sustain their....(well, HIS, Balsamo's) ....raison d'etre.

The part I smell?? BS.



reply posted on 4-3-2011 @ 11:13 AM by rogerstigers
reply to post by weedwhacker



For the benefit of those of us who are not passionate in our stance on the subject, nor technical gurus on avionics and airfield operations, perhaps you could give some details about how this report is incorrect?


reply posted on 4-3-2011 @ 11:26 AM by weedwhacker
reply to post by rogerstigers



In due course. I have only recently risen to greet the day, and discover this latest load of claptrap that spewed from the creative and fertile "genius" minds of the PffffT crowd.

Meanwhile, others may feel free to coduct their own fact-checking....


reply posted on 4-3-2011 @ 11:28 AM by rogerstigers
reply to post by network dude



Hmm.. Only one video of the 4 on their main page really show anything of merit. It does sort of look like a plane... course it also looks like a missle, a cigar tube, and a flying silver bannana. LOL

I guess in light of eyewitness testimony, there's no reason for me to doubt it being a plane. Course, that's about all the videos can backup. *shrug*


reply posted on 4-3-2011 @ 11:39 AM by network dude
reply to post by rogerstigers




this one at 1:27 is the one that makes me more confused than relieved. I wish someone could do some calculations to determine the size of the object based on other points of interest, but that may be impossible. To me, the object just seems to be too close to the ground as far away as it is from the building. Then looking at the ground before the collapse, there are no groves in the grass where this thing should have been scraping it's engines on the ground. (but that is based on nothing but my guess) As I have said before, I wish it was easy enough to just believe the OS, it would make things so much easier. There are just too many strange things to deal with.


reply posted on 4-3-2011 @ 11:44 AM by hooper
Originally posted by Hessdalen
reply to
post by hooper



I'll just have to cry myself to sleep again tonight.


just as an example for the value system and moral standart of the US...


Sorry, but we don't have a "value system" or "moral standards". We all get to decide for ourselves. Its called personal freedom and choice. And so far, so good. Not perfect, but better than anything else.


reply posted on 4-3-2011 @ 11:50 AM by hooper
reply to post by rogerstigers



Then why do we have need of the FOIA?

Variety of reasons, primarily for defined access.

I have always been tought it was a citizen's DUTY to question and double check the LEOs and ensure that their job was being done correctly.

As an individual you may, of course, question, check, doubt or dismiss anything you want. But we have a system for making final determinations and that does not include responding to every casual comment by every citizen.


reply posted on 4-3-2011 @ 01:21 PM by zimishey
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to
post by rogerstigers



In due course. I have only recently risen to greet the day, and discover this latest load of claptrap that spewed from the creative and fertile "genius" minds of the PffffT crowd.

Meanwhile, others may feel free to coduct their own fact-checking....



Please will you give us your credentials? Ie., your technical credentials? Thnaks



reply posted on 4-3-2011 @ 02:18 PM by Zanti Misfit
reply to post by network dude


" Then looking at the ground before the collapse, there are no groves in the grass where this thing should have been scraping it's engines on the ground."


Could that be due to the Possible Fact that the " Alledged " Plane Impacted the Pentagon with its Landing Gear Down thus giving Clearence for the Engines not to impact the Ground ? If so , where is the Evidence of the Planes Wheel Marks embeded in the Grass ? ....Hmm ..... More Questions STILL Unanswered....


reply posted on 4-3-2011 @ 02:29 PM by hooper
reply to post by Zanti Misfit



Could that be due to the Possible Fact that the " Alledged " Plane Impacted the Pentagon with its Landing Gear Down thus giving Clearence for the Engines not to impact the Ground ? If so , where is the Evidence of the Planes Wheel Marks embeded in the Grass ? ....Hmm ..... More Questions STILL Unanswered....


Just out of curiosity - you just made up a "possible fact" - how does that constitute an "unaswered question"? Isn't that really an example of an "unsubstantiated assumption" on your part? Shouldn't you first be burdened with substantiating your "guess" before someone else is burdened with answering questions it may or may not raise?


reply posted on 4-3-2011 @ 02:37 PM by Zanti Misfit
reply to post by hooper



Ok , I will Humor you with another Question . To the best of your knowledge of the Event , did the " Alledged Plane " Impact the Pentagon with it's Landing Gear UP or Down ? Please Enlighten me Sir .


reply posted on 4-3-2011 @ 02:49 PM by hooper
reply to post by Zanti Misfit



To the best of my knowledge, up. I believe one witness thought they were down. I think there is indication from the flight data recorder.


reply posted on 4-3-2011 @ 03:02 PM by TrueAmerican
reply to post by weedwhacker



That's not enough, WW. Technically refute his arguments.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 12 days ago with 48 member flags
9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 4 days ago with 45 member flags
9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 14 days ago with 43 member flags
What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 8 days ago with 17 member flags
Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 16 days ago with 13 member flags
Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 18 days ago with 9 member flags
British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 8 days ago with 8 member flags