It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
I've never seen a poll that suggests that. There are polls that ask whether the respondents believe there is anything at all remotely wrong with what the authorities have told us about 9/11, but they're usually designed to include people who think there may have been intelligence failures, and that the government has covered them up.
When the U.S. media is as BROKEN as it is, it's no wonder we can't get any poll results. However, if it happens to come up at a party, in a classroom, with neighbors I can tell you I only know a very small handful of people who think it happened as we saw on TV that day.
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
Does this IRS data show an inflight align?
Happily following the discussion until I got to your 'dozens of socks' .
...does BS mean .......
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Now....I saw Thermo Klein's post from the 6th of March, page whatever-it-was....from just under 24 hours ago. A question was asked, and I am VERY glad [he] was able to screen-grab and post that page from the NTSB Flight Data Specialist's Report for AAL 77 (I have it on my hard-drive....the PDF won't let me copy....haven't figured out the technical details on THAT, yet....).
Originally posted by weedwhacker
...does BS mean .......
Or, perhaps.....:
'bogus statement' (?)
'big sham' (?)
'bull slop' (?)
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Now....I saw Thermo Klein's post from the 6th of March, page whatever-it-was....from just under 24 hours ago. A question was asked, and I am VERY glad [he] was able to screen-grab and post that page from the NTSB Flight Data Specialist's Report for AAL 77 (I have it on my hard-drive....the PDF won't let me copy....haven't figured out the technical details on THAT, yet....).
Weedwhacker, thanks a lot for taking the time to write all that! I screen-grabbed the first thing I saw that looked like it was associated with IRS but honestly have 13 double-column pages of similar info (as is on your hardrive), so I wonder if your "No" statement holds true for the whole data file. I did a little more research on the data points map (top pic on page 12 I believe) and it is alleged to show an airborne full auto-align, but I get differing answers from both sides...
Originally posted by NightGypsy
Here's my question.....
After all this time, why are there members on here who still argue with the likes of Dereks and Hooper? Just curious. It's obvious who they are and what they are trying to do. Time to ignore...........then maybe, just maybe.....if there IS a God, they will slither away never to return.
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
reply to post by Reheat
Some of what I've read about in-flight "whatever" is that lasers are used to get extremely precise readings instantaneously, precise because the flight crew signals the laser to align while in close proximity to a specific beacon. We also have GPS now which allegedly wasn't available to commercial planes at that time but was available on military planes. Do you know anything about this?
And, if there was no auto-align how did the readings come into coallescence in the Flt 77 data?
thanks
Originally posted by nexusferox
reply to post by Reheat
'Don't despair. If you still don't understand after this and after reading those articles we'll try again. As Weedhacker said it's difficult to "dumb down" this stuff for the layman. '
Exactly. I admit I don't have the fortitude and/or analytical skills to try and unravel half of the technical aspects of this argument, even though it's written in my mother tongue and on THAT note we are supposed to believe that Hani Hanour not only managed to pull-off a near-impossible flight manouevre PLUS do all that aligning stuff PLUS fly unaided for hundreds of miles before singling out the very office space that was home to an internal investigation to the tune of 2.3 trillion dollars and all while screaming allahu akbar I suppose..
Such a smart cookie that boy was, much too smart for a Cessna...I mean he DID have that genius-level spark of intelligence gleaming in his eye, right?
The mind boggles that someone who flies professionally and is therefore in full control of 300+ people's lives could credit the OS as fact. I would expect more discernment from a person in such an elevated position in life.
Originally posted by NightGypsy
Here's my question.....
After all this time, why are there members on here who still argue with the likes of Dereks and Hooper? Just curious. It's obvious who they are and what they are trying to do. Time to ignore...........then maybe, just maybe.....if there IS a God, they will slither away never to return.
Originally posted by Reheat
You still are not understanding an ALIGNMENT versus UPDATES. They are two different things altogether. An alignment occurs on the ground and initializes the unit to a location/position on the surface of the earth. Then accelerometers and gyros detect movement and display that as a position from the original aligned position.
After airborne the units UPDATE their position automatically with either VOR/DME or DME/DME (look up these via google) to control drift and refine the position already present in the units. In other words, the UPDATES cause them to be more precise over time.
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
Originally posted by Reheat
You still are not understanding an ALIGNMENT versus UPDATES. They are two different things altogether. An alignment occurs on the ground and initializes the unit to a location/position on the surface of the earth. Then accelerometers and gyros detect movement and display that as a position from the original aligned position.
After airborne the units UPDATE their position automatically with either VOR/DME or DME/DME (look up these via google) to control drift and refine the position already present in the units. In other words, the UPDATES cause them to be more precise over time.
I have a pretty good understanding of the two now (and thank you for your contribution in that), the issue is that you say an airborne alignment is not possible, yet others say it was possible and give a map of coordinates that clearly show the airplane position CHANGING to match the radar location - if updates are ascertained by accelerometer and gyro comparisons from the initial location, how did the aircraft suddenly change and start matching the radar designation?
Can someone please explain how this picture indicates an inflight alignment?
Originally posted by weedwhackerIT should be apparent to people who will just stop and think logically, for half a second....tens of thousands of professional airline pilots, and only a tiny handful spout this tripe. That, in itself, ought to tell you something......
...and updated beginning on the Take-Off roll via ground based Navigation Aids.