Hi all,
I am a fan of ATS and am often here, lurking about. I thought though that it might be useful to say something on this thread.
First, Blue Beam. I agree that the poster makes a good point, and what seems to be a fair criticism of my position. After all, I DO posit the
existence of a 'breakaway civilization,' one that is possibly very far beyond us in key technological and possibly cosmological features. Why then
could they not pull off Blue Beam?
Well, I wrote my piece on Blue Beam during a minor hysteria about it in early October 2010. At that time, there were predictions (copied and pasted
across the web and esp Facebook) about a Blue Beam event that was to take place on October 13. I am sure many of you recall this. Certain people prone
to delusions and fantasy were most guilty of promoting this prediction.
I took the opportunity to research the history of the Blue Beam idea. It appears to have come from a man named Serge Monast. In reviewing his work, I
never found any evidence that he was positioned to know anything at all about this. He was a Christian fundamentalist and anti-NWO, spoke only French
(he was Quebecois), and as far as I could see, didn't get around much. Who did he know within the UN -- as he claimed -- who leaked him the
information of an impending move by the UN to create the new world order and a rejection of Christianity via a faked alien invasion? In my
observation, the answer is, no one.
My article, if you are interested, is here:
www.afterdisclosure.com...
The follow up article by Christopher Knowles, sited at the top of this thread, is simply outstanding research, in my opinion. He followed up on my own
thoughts and did some seriously good research.
But that doesn't resolve the apparent contradiction. If I believe in a breakaway group, why do I doubt that they could pull off a Blue Beam type of
event?
The fact is I don't strongly deny it at all. False flags DO occur all the time. 9/11 ... obviously. And so much more. My problem with Blue Beam was
in an examination of the evidence. I did not see any. On top of that, I was distressed and somewhat annoyed to see overt fear mongering by certain
people who loved nothing more than scaring the # out of people, on something without evidence. So I made my statement.
But CAN something like Blue Beam happen? Well, even a breakaway group, as I hypothesize about, would have its hands full trying to pull this off, I
think. The logistics, as I see it, would be a nightmare. Assume it's an alien invasion scenario. Do they just create a hologram, like in V? Do they
use it to blow up buildings like Independence Day? Will there be any attempt to provide evidence to an intensely skeptical global scientific
community? These are not trivial matters. Many things are possible in our world today, but I am not willing to make a statement supporting Blue Beam
without something concrete to go on.
Which brings me to the second critique, also fair. That I provide no real evidence for the existence of a breakaway civilization. I fully take the
point. I don't have anything tangible. I do think, though, that I am guilty of not always explaining what I mean clearly enough on this. While I do
think that there is a substantial built infrastructure for the deep black community involved, I don't think it's like Alternative 3, in which they
bail out of our world completely. They have family, after all, mothers and fathers, family reunions. I think of it as an extreme version of the
classified world, in which people are on deep assignment for extended periods, but return to the 'white world' periodically. I am sure it creates
great personal stress in their lives.
Consider a conversation I once had with a former NSA scientist. I have come to know this person reasonably well. He told me that the NSA had computing
capabilities of 650 Mhz in the mid-1960s. That's no great shakes today of course, but the PC market didn't reach that speed until around 2000.
Thirty-five years.
How much more advanced might the deep black world be today? Especially if they have access to studying ET technology, as I believe they do?
I think the question answers itself: very far, indeed!
The final critiques were lifted from a piece written two years ago by Michael Schulyer. I recall that very well. I certainly think those particular
criticisms were completely off base. I wrote my own reply, a fairly extended one, on the Paracast blog at the time.
regards,
Richard Dolan
keyholepublishing.com...