This quote below is a statement coming directly from one of the companies that makes fuel for air planes and jets used by our government, the military
and some private corporations. They openly and out right admit that they are putting industrial toxic waste into the fuel supply. They state that they
first discovered this technique while trying to find a way to dispose of 2.7 million gallons of napalm left over from the Vietnam war. The expenses
normally involved in disposing of industrial toxic waste are usually quite large. There are numerous government regulations that need to be followed
when normally disposing of these toxic chemicals. As well as political, environmental and public relations issues. They can easily avoid these costs
and issues by using the techniques explained on their website.
This is the companies website homepage
This is the source file of the quote made by Battelle on their company brochure.
Battelle scientists at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory led a cooperative effort to eliminate Department of Defense stockpiles of napalm
from the Vietnam War. After three other contractors failed Battelle provided a solution that overcame safety and environmental concerns
political sensitivities and public scrutiny that had followed the project since its inception. Our process not only disposed of more than 2.7
million gallons of the dangerous substance on schedule and with an outstanding safety record it also recycled the napalm and blended it with
other industrial waste products to make a specification fuel with exceptionally high thermal energy value.
They can now use this technique to dispose of more and more industrial toxic waste. And since the fuel is only being used in government, military and
some private/corporate jets. It would be very hard to get access to samples of the fuel for testing. In addition to the fact that the fuel additives
are privately patented and the ingredients are classified as top secret. If they ever were to get caught and the public found out those ingredients,
the official story would most likely be that they are being used in tests for the geo-engineering programs.
There are numerous other companies both corporate and private who are involved with geo-engineering and many other governments and industrial military
complexes. Some of which probably have no knowledge about the ( my opinion "unnecessary" ) toxic waste being added along with the many other
ingredients, such as chemical polymers and solid metal particulate matter being used in the special jet fuel. The exceptionally high thermal energy
value is a very likely reason that these contrails persist the way they do. The material in the exhaust takes much longer to cool off. It means that
the fuel is less likely to be affected by normal flight conditions such as heat and is less likely to break down molecularly before it is used. When
this fuel is used and burned it has a much higher temperature rating than normal jet fuel. It has about 100x greater thermal stability and is called
the "JP8+100 effect" by people in the aviation industry.
Here is a .PDF document from the Australian Governments Department of Defense that explains the JP8+100 effect.
I have many other documents in .PDF form and they are available to anyone online. I found them during my investigations and are a matter of public
record. These companies and the government must disclose some of the things by law. So they use very difficult scientific wording and vague
descriptions as well as using acronyms in their reports. This helps in the prevention of understanding and their attempt to disguise what they are
Please do not believe the people trying to tell you that these "persistent contrails " are normal. It is a very new phenomenon and even NASA admits
that not much is known about them and has asked for public assistance in keeping track of these in the past. They actually have asked school children
to record them. Anyone who tells you that there is scientific proof thats easily explains what these "persistent contrails" are is lying. The real
actual scientific studies done on "persistent contrails" are very few and far between. They have not been done by non-biased independent labs and
scientists and there is no agreed upon conclusions about them. Especially when subject to peer review by other scientists studying this phenomenon.
I will continue to try and release the knowledge and information I have found thus far. I admit that none of it proves in any conclusive way what is
being done or for what reason. I only suggest that you investigate this issue more yourself and do not take the word of anyone trying to tell you that
they are harmless. Even normal exhaust from any vehicle is not harmless. That is a well known fact. So just think about it, investigate it and decide
I am going to try my best to put the information that I have so far into the other threads. When I have gone through and edited down the content and
determined a clearer way to present said information.
edit on 8-3-2011 by MathiasAndrew because: edit text