It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


The remains of Sodom and Gomorrah

page: 2
<< 1   >>

log in


posted on Mar, 6 2011 @ 02:54 PM

Originally posted by greyer
reply to post by Akragon

What about the site where water flowed out of the split rock. I see over the web that it has been recognized for years but I never learned about it. It looks believable to me because if the earth is God's creation than God would surely leave a standing mark in history for people to know. People claim that the location is on the otherside of the area where the Iraelites mentioned, but with the smooth rocks on the lower area, that is hard evidence that water was there.

This Ron Wyatt guy did a video on that one too...
edit on 6-3-2011 by Akragon because: (no reason given)

posted on Mar, 6 2011 @ 03:10 PM
Interesting videos.

You need to place some degree of trust on the people that made the video and some imagination to see a city in the eroded desert. Also the sphinx is thought to have been modeled after natural desert formations called yardangs so to me the formation they claim to be a sphinx is consistent with a simple and naturally created yardang.

Anyway my faith needs no additional proof.

Thanks for the thread.....

posted on Mar, 6 2011 @ 03:28 PM

Originally posted by racasan[/i

Nevertheless, we sent the samples for chemical analysis to a reputable Australian laboratory.12 Their report was interpreted by a Ph.D. geochemist.13 The existence of the sulfur ball is not surprising—the entire area is rich in natural sulfur. The results from the ‘ash’ (see chart below, right) were not consistent with what would be expected from incinerated ancient buildings, or rock ash of any sort. Instead, they clearly indicated an [evaporite] deposit of gypsum-type minerals. This crumbly, easily eroded material fully explains the visual impressions, and is consistent with the known features of this area. The chemistry also shows an abundance of carbonates, which would be broken down by heat.14

The chemistry also shows an abundance of carbonates, which would be broken down by heat.

I don't get this last sentence, is that correct english lol

posted on Mar, 6 2011 @ 03:39 PM
As in particals that are carbon based, ie diamonds, other such gems/carbon based molecules.

posted on Mar, 6 2011 @ 03:53 PM
I just don't know why he said "which would be broken down by heat"

posted on Mar, 6 2011 @ 03:58 PM

Originally posted by greyer
I just don't know why he said "which would be broken down by heat"

because every element has a melting point....

posted on Mar, 7 2011 @ 08:28 PM
still doesn't make any sense to why he would say it like that, was it broken down by heat or not, thats all the reader wants to know. We want to know if the material of these ruins are ash or not basically, and he made it seem like he was trying to hide the truth that it was.

posted on Mar, 7 2011 @ 08:47 PM
Scientist believe that it was an asteroid that caused it. There was a Sumerian planisphere that mentioned a large object that passed through the sky and they mapped it on the planisphere (a circular clay tablet.) The asteroid exploded in the air over the Austrian Alps causing huge plumes of debris to go up into the lower space region and rain down over the Dead Sea region where Sodom & Gomorrah were located.


Here is a documentary on it. It's really interesting.

It was a real event but has a natural explanation for what happened.

posted on Oct, 9 2011 @ 03:38 PM

Will be watching those videos later tonight, I just want to ask ahead of time if they explain why the explosion is described the way it is? Like smoke rising from a furnace. Do asteroids do that?

I personally don't believe any of this is proof of gods, I think it's related to the Annunaki but again, I don't feel this is proof of this.

I've always just looked at it as another reason to believe we had much more advanced past.

posted on Oct, 12 2011 @ 07:37 PM
Thanks for posting this thread Akragon.

I have since stumbled upon the work of Ron Wyatt without even looking at this thread. His work is amazing and he seems to be legitimate as far as I can tell. It seems that stories about the Ark of the covenant being held in Ethiopia are an attempt to keep the location of the Ark safe and secure by using misdirection.

Wyatt has found archaeological proof of:

Noah's ark
The Red Sea Crossing
Mount Sinai
Sodom and Gomorrah
The Ark of the Covenant
Christ's blood - (Watch the video to see how this is found, Our God is amazing!)

posted on Oct, 12 2011 @ 08:16 PM
reply to post by XplanetX

Yes i've seen all of those videos...

they are quite interesting...

This is an old thread i didn't think i'd see again lol

edit on 12-10-2011 by Akragon because: (no reason given)

new topics

top topics

<< 1   >>

log in