There is really too many comments to reply to here.
If free energy came out tomorrow and replaced oil and gas fuel, the oil companies would not have to tear down all
their infrastructure. FYI
There are thousands upon thousands of products made from crude. Things that unlimited energy could not touch because it is simply not in the same
Organic and Inorganic solvents. Plastics. Lubricating oils, waxes, polishes, etc. The list goes on and on.
And the truth is, is that if energy was available near free, the oil companies could jack their rates on everything else they produce and there would
be an economic shift. It happens all the time in business. It wouldn't be the end of an industry, it would be a change in current market values and
Only if it is not available to the masses. And nothing will cost anything once free energy is widespread.
That's ridiculous. Nothing would cost anything? So we have unlimited food supply because we have unlimited energy? This is an absurd statement. You
still have to produce food, you still have to produce clothing, people still have to administer paper work. There are still jobs and therefore there
is still money. Jobs = Money, If you want insight into this just walk around the US or Canada. Everything is about consumption. Take energy out of the
game and people would just buy more useless crap than they already do.
I did a few online searches and I found people passing off ion lifters (charged aluminum foil) as electrogravitics
. Maybe you can direct me to
a legitimate source of electrogravitics
. Something real without five pages of "Don King-esque intelligence speak" attached to it.
You're talking about technology, inventions that use energy. I'm talking energy production itself.
Inventions have lowered the costs of many, many things in history. So the two go hand in hand. And this is an invention that lowers the cost of
something. Not really unconnected.
Maybe because Rossi is a convicted fraudster? He was sent to jail in the 90s for some energy product related scam, and seems to be an all round shady
Big surprise. I did quick search, apparently the argument on the other side is: "The government shut him down because they didn't want him to
I agree with you. Many fraudsters out there. Met one personally that told me about his grandiose energy production plans and suggested I invest. Also
told me about other investments schemes that triggered warnings from the FBI website when I google searched them. lol.
Not only would they have to dismantle a complex system of doing business which they are already familiar with, in favor of something completely new
The way corporations operate these days is not so black and white. They are set up to make money on just about anything. Hence why GE is considered a
financial company as opposed to an electronics manufacturer. Read about the days of Milken and the Drexel scandal. People were creating businesses out
of thin air and consolidating, merging companies together that were complete opposites.
and if it really were 'free energy'...then they would have a hell of a time figuring out how to make a profit. In other words, it would be a HUGE
This isn't the case. There are so many types of business that have been created out of thin air. There are also things that should cost nothing that
cost way too much. Business is much trickier than how it has been outlined in this thread.
but his money was riding on DC, so he ridiculed Tesla's AC at every opportunity
They were competing, yes. There are many processes in current business that compete with each other. There are many options that are favoured as it
stands now. But there is a huge profit potential with no cost energy. Not just by energy industries, but by industry that pays a fortune for energy.
Case in point. A large size fabrication shop can spend up and over 200k a month on hyrdo bills. There are people in think tanks trying to reduce cost
at these places. If energy companies themselves didn't try to usurp "free energy" there are a thousand other fields that would want it.
...that it would actually HELP to stabilize those countries? Of course it wouldn't.....if anything it would make them desperate, and probably cause
more anti-american sentiment than ever before.
Terrorism started when other nations started invading these countries for their resources. Lol.
I can understand your skepticism; however, has anyone ever completed a study on what costs might be involved for an oil company to decommission all of
its infrastructure (in order to start pursuing a new form of energy production?) I'm thinking that while they were busy wrapping up all their
previous interests (rigs, pipelines etc) and shifting their marketing focus, we'd see other start-ups & lateral diversification from companies coming
in and 'stealing the glory'.
I don't think you guys understand how many products are made from fossil fuels. It's in just about anything we consume. Energy production is really
just the tip of the iceberg.
And no, they would not have to tear down their infrastructure. They may have to make modifications, yes.
Even Rossi says they have been hesitant to do so. If they can scale them enough to just run everything on an individual level (car, light, tv, phone,
etc) then there would be no need for power plants or centralized reactors as everything would have its own power source.
This is absurd. People will not want mini-reactors in their homes. And if you did this, you still create a giant industry with maintenance,
installation and insurance. You are going to create a billion or so reactors and put them in every home, apartment building, business, etc? This is
science fiction. Energy is centralized for a reason, whether it be free or paid for.
There are certain systems that work de-centralized, solar and thermal to be exact. As far as "cold fusion" or something that generates superheated
steam, it's not happening. People would want it centralized, normal people, without tinfoil hats.