There certainly is a variation on your opinion as in previous posts throughout this thread,the moon has no affect,and now it does,very interesting,like the semantics of the day !

Obviously you think you know more than the U.S. Navy.

My advice to you, is never go scuba diving.

I guess you are saying that the specialized steel used to make up the hull of a ship is not used because of the enormous pressure deep under the ocean?

There is "religious" dogma in all the mainstream science sites as well, because macroevolution is an unfalsifiable theory.

I also don't know of anything in the book on the hydroplate theory that clashes with empirical, testable, verifiable, observable science, but only with the tectonic plate theory.

True science is observation and experimentation, and any theory purporting to be scientific must be falsifiable. I'm not aware of anyone having proposed any way to falsify macroevolution. Instead, every time some discovery is made that should have been accepted as falsification has been brushed aside as a mere "adjustment"; that is, they keep moving the goalposts. So the charge of "dogma" lies as surely at the feet of evolutionism as any other faith-based system; its zealots have unshakable faith that no discovery will ever refute it, hence it is unfalsifiable.

Macroevolution is merely a "handle" on the teaching also known as "molecules to man". It means the belief that life evolved from nonlife, whether on this planet or some other, regardless of how far back the line is pushed. It is evolutionists who invented the theory, not creationists.

you deny a global flood

Both sides have the same evidence but different theories

yet only one side fears and even goes to law to silence the other.

I'm here because the sacred cow theory of plate tectonics is finally being seriously challenged