It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
As far as birds descending from dinosaurs, didn't they connect modern chickens to T-rex through DNA?
A large portion of the Earth could have been covered in water when Earth was much smaller.
Have you conclusively provided any irrefutable evidence the whole previous pages,there are plenty of previous posts by myself and others ,so you need to be peer reviewed to be correct,thats when several people collectively agree ohh..
ncredibly shrinking earth,
if it does`nt expand then it must shrink
Off course the earth was completely covered in water,the snowball earth and oh.no that is not real either
Having such a precise yardstick allowed Russian dynamicists Gregoriy A. Krasinsky and Victor A. Brumberg to calculate, in 2004, that the sun and Earth are gradually moving apart. It's not much – just 15 cm per year – but since that's 100 times greater than the measurement error, something must really be pushing Earth outward. But what?
650 000 000 years ago a iceage and the earth moves 15cms away from the sun per year thats 97,500km/60583 miles of the Asronomical unit of 93 million miles closer to the sun,not to mention the previous ones.
Geologists have proven this. ( the sea level being much greater).
They dont find dinosaur bones in the ocean or on the coasts.
When the earth was small it froze over. Snowball earth. The crust cracked and the earth expanded. Some ice melted and fell into the massive cracks causing much steam the covered the globe. It rained. As the earth expanded there were shallow seas. As the ice melted even more so due to the positioning of the continents, the oceans filled up. This ice can still be seen on top of Antarctica.
When the water levels were high the continent of Antarctica slid under the million year old ice and as the earth expanded more the water level came down, resting the ancient ice on top of Antarctica. Just a thought.
I am in contact with some geologists and we are going through some material and running some models that shows that west coast of North America was connected to Asia at the Pacific.
Pangaea theory is bunk or false. The theory always shows America and Asia as separate continents which is not true at all. They are one continent and has always been. Pangaea shows that the continents drift apart and one day they will crash into each other again. Silly and unproven.
Some geologists that I have spoke to around the world are leaning towards expanding earth theory because it answers so many unanswered questions that is still a mystery with geologists.
Originally posted by stereologist
We are still left with no evidence at all that the world is expanding. The expando doohicky continues to be a tall tale with zero supporting evidence.
There have bee lots of claims that scientists are working on it.
1. Inadequate bone strength to support the largest dinosaurs
2. Inadequate muscle strength to lift and move the largest dinosaurs
3. Unacceptable high blood pressure and stress on the heart of the tallest dinosaurs
4. Aerodynamics principles showing that the pterosaurs should not have flown
The sauropod blood pressure paradox has been debated for several years and now it is showing up in physics textbooks. Increasingly, paleontologists are coming to the belief that the Brachiosaurus could not have held its head up, and likewise the other sauropods could not have reared up on their hind legs to reach the higher foliage.
I like this map a lot. North America fits in nice to Asia. The continents were also connected at the Pacific.
Now, the Earth expando theory is able to explain this paradox. Nice, isn't it? [/quote
Did you read Esker's material? He does not support an expando doohickey idea.
Here is what he suggests:
The result of my investigation of how dinosaurs could be so large led to the solution that the Earth must have had an extremely thick atmosphere. This result makes clear predictions in regards to the shape of dinosaurs, the global climate of the Mesozoic era, the explanation of the existence of massive carbonated rock deposits, oceanic volcanism and the evolution of the Earth, and a new understanding of the development of our solar system.
If you want to reference his material make sure that he follow through on his thought processes and donot misrepresent his position.
Unfortunately for all who hinge on his every word and explanation, the expando theory is about as far out in left field as anyone can get...but if you study his statements as to what effects such a model would have on us inhabitants on earth, he is correct...volcanos going off, new madrid quake, tsunamis etc...
Ok, i see. However, can you explain to me when does planetary creation end?
When, and why? What stops cosmic dust, that has been the foundation of our planet, from getting here now?