It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Not really a informative way to have a debate.
BTW, I dont need to show you anything for it is not important to anyone what YOU think or believe ok? Other people have the mind for it and other people want to discuss the theories.
You have yet to prove me wrong.... remember that.
More pictures to come and vids....
The more I look at this image the more I cant escape the fact that north america and Eurasia were connected at the pacific as well.
You call the EPT stupid even though it actually could fit in with, and help to explain the plate/seismic theory further, but you have not proven in any way that your theory ONLY, is correct.
This theory is still being put forth by numerous people who are publishing and attending seminars where their information is being presented to their peers and being discussed. I have seen and read this information myself, and so have others here.
Unfortunately, not everyone is able to be open minded and be able to see the possibilities because their thinking is too hidebound, or something else.
NEWTON'S Theory is on the verge of falling or being seriously changed right now!
Originally posted by stereologist
The lack of a reply to my commentary......
Dr. Maxlow's interests in Expansion Tectonics stem from a dissatifaction with plate tectonics in explaining geological phenomena. As part of his PhD research into global tectonics, he created models of an expanding Earth from the present back to the early Archaean Era. This is the first time that both oceanic and continental crusts have been used to reconstruct plate assemblage for the entire 100% of Earth history. Models were then used to layer global geographical, climatic, geophysical and geological data to quantify an Earth expansion process (note: Earth expansion = growing Earth).
The Plate Tectonic interpretation of global data, for instance, is based on the fundamental premise that the Earths radius has remained constant, or near constant, throughout history. As will be outlined in this paper, this contrasts with an Expansion Tectonic interpretation of the same global data which is based on the fundamental premise that the Earths radius has been steadily increasing throughout Earth history.
It should be appreciated from this statement that all modern and historical global data used to substantiate both Plate Tectonic and Expansion Tectonic theories are, in fact, identical. The only reason why Plate Tectonic theory won acceptance 50 years ago was because debate on whether or not Earths radius does or does not change with time was largely hypothetical – since it couldn’t be convincingly verified or measured.
Since then there has been a quantum leap in both technology and peoples understanding of our physical Earth, ranging from the introduction of computers, modern data gathering and processing capabilities, advances in software, satellite technologies, media presentation and, of course, increased public awareness of global tectonic principles.
Subsequent work by the Commission for the Geological Map of the World and UNESCO during the 1980s led to the publication of the “Bedrock Geological Map of the World” in 1991. In this global map, the magnetic striping discussed above was taken a step further. By dating the ages of the ocean floor bedrock at regular intervals throughout each of the oceans, and comparing these ages with the magnetic striping, the ocean floor crust was then displayed according to the ages of the rocks.
What this means is the yellow stripes in Figure 2, for instance, located between the younger red stripe and the older orange strip, represents volcanic rocks that were erupted along the ancient mid-ocean-ridges during the Miocene Period, a period of time extending from 6 to 23 million years ago. At that time the younger red and pink rocks did not exist and the two yellow Miocene stripes were joined together along their common mid-ocean-ridge.
At this stage there are a number of very important considerations about the crustal mapping shown in the above figures that must be fully appreciated.
* Firstly, the striping shown in Figure 2 shows that each of the oceans contain a mid-ocean-ridge (currently centred below the pink stripes) and each ocean is increasing its surface area with time. This increase in surface area is shown to be symmetrical within each ocean and the maximum age of exposed sea floor crust is early Jurassic – about 165 million years old (pale blue areas).
* Secondly, if it were possible to move back in time, each of the stripes shown in both Figures 1 and 2 must be successively removed and the corresponding edges of each coloured stripe must be moved closer together as we move back in time – that is, the volcanic rocks (and similarly the ocean waters) within each stripe must be returned to the mantle where they originally came from.
* Thirdly, as we move back in time, each of the continents must move closer together in strict accordance with the striping evidence recorded on the map in Figure 2 regardless of which tectonic theory is adhered to.
* Fourthly, subduction of crusts beneath continents is an artifact of the basic Plate Tectonic requirement for a constant Earth radius. The symmetrical striping evidence shown does not support subduction and subduction is not required if the Earth were increasing its radius.
It should also be appreciated that none, or very little of this magnetic striping and age dating evidence was available when Plate Tectonic theory was first proposed. The global distribution of the magnetic striping and age dating was, in fact, completed later in order to quantify the plate motion history and, therefore, the Plate Tectonic history of each ocean.
You can read more at the above link, in fact I recommend you read the whole article.
Yep, the evidence adds up more and more, and shows that this is an extremely viable theory!
Out of over 40 posts in this thread you offered not one source but complete ignorant blind belief in another theory from 1915. I like to learn and keep current.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by Shadow Herder
Despite what you claim
Nope, but I do know a person can be both
you do as a living it seems that you have the words stupid and dumb confused.
Who said it was my theory..... do you lknow what a theory is? Google it.
Your so-called theory
may have been relevant a century ago.
Today, as the world is being studied it makes no sense at all. In fact, the real scientists drop it half a century ago.
Your so-called theory may have been relevant a century ago. Today, as the world is being studied it makes no sense at all. In fact, the real scientists drop it half a century ago. Only those unable to publish in real journals have used this failure as a means of pulling in income after being complete failures in the scientific world.
You know what that word 'stupid' means? It means unwilling to learn.
So what do you call the people pushing this asinine hoax?
? I think the true "asinine hoax" is a flat earth with no inside