It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
with research into a theory
At CERN they are searching for particles that have never been observed in fact, it is theory that is leading them to search for the truth about their speculations in order to establish fact, one way or another.
I would say that the idea a big ball of molten iron found itself inexplicably in a cold orbit around the sun and that a shell of matter began to form around it by yet unknown processes to be equally laughable.
A good start would be to explain that molten iron in orbit bit and give us your theories and facts about the genesis of the earth.
It just makes more sense to me than huge balls of molten iron arriving and stopping in multiple orbits around the sun and sitting there until Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars could figure out how to develop their shells.
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
[snip] Great work guys. You see I am not a firm believer in anything, I have tested Pangaea and it is partially correct but it never sat right with me ever since I heard about it as a child. Now that I have seen the expanding earth theory it begins to explain alot more. Theories for ya. Good debate. Saying something isnt so without proof is just plain stupid.
Made this gif. Shows you how the continent broke apart as the pacific expanded.
They admitted it was a phenomena never seen before and that their established theories could not even support it's existence
they suggest that these new findings will prompt a change in our understanding of the heliosphere and the processes that shape it.
First, much of his understanding of how a pole flip occurs, as well as how a crustal slip may occur, is dependent upon the idea of the center of the earth having a rotating mass of molten iron, that is creating the planet earth's magnetic field by virtue of its spin.
The earth's magnetic field, humanities shield, is failing, and has a period that is about 11,800 years between re-charges.
First, molten metals cannot hold a magnetic charge, nor can they create one, no matter how fast they may spin.
Second, even if molten iron could hold a magnetized state, it would take a mass of iron approximately half again as big as the whole of the earth to generate the level of magnetic field we can measure now, let alone at its peak.
The whole 'iron core' theory relies on thinking of the core of the earth as a dynamo. So in following with that, the only way that earth could have a weakening magnetic field would be if the 'iron core' were to be slowing down.
Further, what we laughingly refer to as 'mainstream science' has recently determined that the core of the earth is not only spinning faster than the crust, but has recently begun to accelerate its spin rate. So much for the iron core idea.
Further, if the earth did have an iron core at its center, then this core would cool over the billions of years, and would solidify, thus altering our planet's active state into more of a dead state insofar as the tectonic plates are concerned. So that does not work logically either.
Patrick's conclusion that the sun will expel vast quantities of south charged, high energy particles is likely correct.
He uses the analogy of the core, being a giant iron magnet, being pushed over as one can push over one magnet with another. This is likely not going to happen.
Nor does it account for the reconstructing of the planet over the 11,800 years between these events to its present, bulged out shape (equatorial bulge, look it up).
Great posts guys. There seems to be ample evidence that supports the expanding earth theory. The more you research it the more you cant escape the evidence earth grew.
Expanding earth makes perfect sense.
Pangaea proposed locations of the continents. It has now been proven wrong.
Expanding earth theory was formed from those detailed modern maps.
scholars and scientist to form the expanding earth theory
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by Shadow Herder
It's a farce. ......
That's a lie.............
That's another lie. expanding Earth is that this is a sad little joke of a theory.
Show me wrong. Point to some real scientific articles and not more uneducated gibberish like that Clif web page.