AIDS Research- Study Finds Most Lubricants Damage Rectal Cells And Some Increase HIV Activity, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times
Topic started on 1-3-2011 @ 12:39 PM by EyeHeartBigfoot
Here is an interesting article regarding AIDS Research - FYI

aidsmap article - HIV & AIDS sharing information changing lives


A study by the Population Council (Begay 2011) has found that every one of a panel of 41 commercially-available sexual lubricants for sale in the USA damaged human rectal and colonic cells in the test tube and compromised the integrity of the single-cell layer that forms the surface of the rectum. In contrast Carraguard, a gel formerly tried as an experimental microbicide, did not damage cells Unexpectedly, the investigators found that four of the lubricants not only damaged the rectal lining cells but appeared actively to increase HIV replication in the cell cultures. They found that this activity was caused by polyquaternium-15, a commonly-used cosmetic ingredient, which has the property of facilitating HIV’s attachment to cells.


Think they will ship any Carraguard care packages to any Third World Countries or just reap the profits of debauchery?


reply posted on 1-3-2011 @ 12:43 PM by EyeHeartBigfoot
Related Article From POPULATION COUNCIL:
Population Council - Research That Makes A Difference

The Council has a current product pipeline that includes next-generation gels based on carrageenan as well as other natural and man-made polymers that contain one or more active pharmaceutical ingredients and can be used independently of coitus as well as rings that remain in place for 1–6 months for long-acting delivery of anti-HIV compounds in the vagina.


Related ATS Thread:
ATS THREAD Vaginal Gels


reply posted on 1-3-2011 @ 01:02 PM by FrancoUn-American
reply to post by EyeHeartBigfoot



Im gonna take a shot in the dark here, maybe its because things dont belong in your butt?



reply posted on 1-3-2011 @ 02:06 PM by EyeHeartBigfoot
Originally posted by FrancoUn-American
reply to
post by EyeHeartBigfoot



Im gonna take a shot in the dark here, maybe its because things dont belong in your butt?


True, should be an exit only.

However, even your wit-isms can't stop HIV/AIDS.

Edification

t


reply posted on 1-3-2011 @ 02:19 PM by LadySkadi
reply to post by FrancoUn-American


Well, as tacky as that statement is... this is about more then sexual preference prejudices...

This is a problem for heterosexuals as well (i.e.) the spermicide gels and condoms using nonoxynol-9 have been shown to break down the vaginal walls and not only can cause women pain during intercourse, but can also put them at greater risk for STD's and HIV.

So, (regardless of your thoughts on hetero/homo sexual sex) this is about products being marketed to PROTECT us when in fact, they are putting us in more danger. I'd call that a serious issue, wouldn't you?

edit on 1-3-2011 by LadySkadi because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 1-3-2011 @ 02:51 PM by FrancoUn-American
reply to post by LadySkadi



Wow so quick you are to assume my statement is anti homosexual, By common sense I meant dont be a whore and sleep with every person you meet and there you have it no aids wow who knew? Ingredients and chemicals in the condoms and lube are FDA approved but never the final product. Not one product claims to be safe, they claim to be SAFER but not safe. Now go ahead and try to twist my words again. Good attempt btw


reply posted on 1-3-2011 @ 03:09 PM by LadySkadi
reply to post by FrancoUn-American

There was no "attempt" to "twist" your words on my part, they speak for you. If you're gonna go with one-liners, than make them clear and concise and with ability to convey what you mean. This is not an example of such clarity:

Im gonna take a shot in the dark here, maybe its because things dont belong in your butt?


edit on 1-3-2011 by LadySkadi because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 2-3-2011 @ 03:35 AM by FrancoUn-American
reply to post by LadySkadi



No I think it's pretty clear and speaks for itself if you keep things out of your anus you will not damage your anus


reply posted on 2-3-2011 @ 11:49 AM by EyeHeartBigfoot
reply to post by LadySkadi




LadySkadi,

Thank you for contributing and standing ground.

docta ignorantia = exsecratio mea

Veneratio,

t


reply posted on 2-3-2011 @ 02:05 PM by LadySkadi
More information about the studies regarding the risks of lubricants as well as further research into potential preventions... Interesting information.

Science Daily


Microbicides -- substances applied topically on the inside of the rectum or vagina -- could potentially help prevent the rectal transmission of HIV, and some are being tested in early Phase I safety studies. Another approach called oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) involves the use of antiretroviral drugs to reduce the risk of HIV in HIV-negative people. A large Phase III trial of PrEP involving men who have sex with men in South America, Africa and the United States is expected to report results by early next year. Yet, if either of these approaches is found effective in clinical trials, they will do no good if those most at risk don't use them. Other research presented at the conference sheds light on this issue. Summaries of all three studies are provided below.

Pages:     ^^TOP^^



As Vaccinations Decline, Whooping Cough Returns
  Posted 14 days ago with 3 member flags
Operation Medicine Delivery
  Posted 18 days ago with 2 member flags
FDA Panel Recommends First HIV-Prevention Drug
  Posted 17 days ago with 1 member flags
Most Skitzophrenics are SANE
  Posted 8 days ago with 1 member flags