Originally posted by Movhisattva
I kind of expected the 'glass tubes' as the subject for your thread.
Far more interesting, not?
Or these lava tubes
edit on 1/3/11 by Movhisattva because: (no reason given)
What I soon discovered is that this evidence wasn't remotely glass tubes or anything like that. One thing that I soon became certain of back then, and all my research in tens of thousands of images since then over the next five years has all reinforced this interpretation, is that the evidence you see above and just about all like it is something on the terrain surface representing life of some kind. Life that spreads and covers downhill surface slopes or grades enabled there by the presence of shallow water flowing down such slopes and then terminating in pooling catch basins at the bottom. At the bottom the ridge forms extends right to the edge of but never extends voluntarily down into the deeper pooling water and only exists in the shallow slope water flow channeling it between the parallel ridges. The only exception to this is when the water level may temporarily rise in the catch basin covering a portion of the ridge forms.
When the depression side slopes are relatively short from the top down to the bottom and the catch system length is long and narrow, then this parallel oriented "ridge form" evidence field is also long and narrow and more uniform in appearance and ridge spacing. When this evidence is seen in this particular set of circumstances, as in my above first image, it tends to visually resemble the long "tubes" interpretation in this distant poor satellite imaging in the quality it has been released to us. The smudge image tampering fields that are typically found around this type of evidence, such as also seen in the first image above, tends to reinforce this impression by smoothing the surrounding background providing the ridges with sharp contrast and also going up between the ridges smoothing out and destroying evidence there giving the ridges a even more pronounced and uniform look.....
…..These factors likely indicate another factor of intentional design, intelligence and therefore active intelligent life as opposed to simple biological life reacting to the presence of this water resource or simple geological activity either for that matter. If only the distancing poor quality imaging and the outright image tampering wasn't so effective in obscuring this evidence, we could then have some better answers..
Also, it should be noted that these formations also initially form consistent with earlier water table and flow levels which may or may not be the same as current lower water levels. So, these ridge forms and their development can tend to follow the water flow levels down the slope as the general underground water table diminishes. This means that the ones at the very top of the slope may no longer represent viable life evidence and may just be very durable forms that last in the terrain long after the higher water level that enabled their development is gone. In such a scenario, the lower level ridge forms are likely the newest and most viable if any shallow flowing water is still present at all at the site or all may be defunct if water is no longer there.
Originally posted by Davian
They are geological anomalies, nothing more. I am sure that 90% of 'claimed' alien technology and 'claimed' alien activity on Mars, and, God help us, the Moon, are nothing but tricks of the eye, and we are seeing what we want to see. Sad, I know, but I am not in anyway saying it isn't possible that there are aliens on Mars or the Moon, I am sure there probably are.