Christian couple lose their High Court battle to foster children because they are against homosexual, page 40
Pages: <<  37    38    39    40    41  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 29 times


reply posted on 3-3-2011 @ 10:52 AM by Kailassa
Originally posted by IronArm
reply to
post by Kailassa


Bi-sexuality? And that is healthy for a child to see? Bi-sexuality means that you will or have had sex with at least 2 people. Is it healthy for a child to see a revolving door of people who you are fooling around with? Probably not. And what causes the spread of STDs? Probably having sex with multiple partners right? Its pretty cut/dried that thats JUST as unhealthy as "Bigotry" based on a strict moral system. And yes, that "JUST" was definately sarcasm.

My entire post, to which you are replying, was:

If you are wanting a man on the side, it's not a fetish, it's bisexuality.

How do you get from that the notion that I am bisexual, or that I'm recommending bisexuality?

If I say to you, red spots behind the ears are indicative of German measles, does that mean I'm an advocate of everyone having German measles?

The rest of your assumptions make no sense either. Bisexuality means being attracted, sexually, to both males and females. It does not mean acting on that attraction.

A person may be a rampantly active bisexual, but not have children.

Even if a parent does act on the attraction, they may do it discretely, or end up with a second marriage.

I agree that the more partners people have, the more STDs end up in the community. However I've never been one to sleep around anyway. Having found myself on my own with handicapped children, and not trusting babysitters, I've devoted my life to supporting, teaching and caring for them.


reply posted on 3-3-2011 @ 11:02 AM by Kailassa
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to
post by IronArm


I totally agree with the effect on your son, but that is an emotional effect. Nobody should be allowing their child to get attached and then have to say goodbye to multiple partners. That is not fair to the child. I don't think sex partners should be coming home with you until they become boyfriend/girlfriend status. Definitely no one night stands at the house.

Don't you know that, if you're not anti gay and anti-abortion, you're automatically a slut who will constantly parade perverted sexual behaviour in front of children?

C'mon, you gotta keep up here.

And please be considerate to the poor fellow you're arguing with. All his other arguments have been debunked, so where's he going to be if he can't prove we're all a bunch of perverted whores?

Everything's quite clear, except for one thing.
What's the silly bastard arguing for?


reply posted on 3-3-2011 @ 11:14 AM by IronArm
reply to post by Kailassa





Thanks for the sympathy.

Debunked? In your opinion sure, in my opinion, I still hold true to my morals.

That said, the previous post is correct. This has gotten too far off topic. Just like every other topic based around homosexuality.


reply posted on 3-3-2011 @ 11:27 AM by getreadyalready
reply to post by controldiction



reply to post by IronArm



The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.

We may have strayed to a tangential topic, but in my opinion the original topic was put to rest very quickly. The couple was not denied adoption rights "because they were Christian." They were denied because they are fanatical and hateful in their interpretation of their religion, and their behavior raised alarms for the people tasked with evaluating them, and those alarms were confirmed by a court.

So the OP is kind of a dead issue, but the overall topic of Homosexuals, Fanaticals, and Parenting has still made for a lively and interesting thread.

Perhaps we have strayed, even from that tangential topic, and moreso into the realm of what constitutes a homosexual, and that discussion should end? I'm sure there are other threads for that.

Most of the posts I have seen have had some strand of tie back to the general topics at hand, but lets keep in mind this is my opinion as a poster and not as a mod, LOL!


As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.



reply posted on 3-3-2011 @ 09:57 PM by PreownedMind
reply to post by TruthxIsxInxThexMist



This isn't a hate filled comment just a personal opinion.

Homosexuality prevents the human species from developing any further so I find it irrational.


reply posted on 4-3-2011 @ 11:18 AM by lunarcrystal
reply to post by ModernAcademia



Sure, let the kids run outside and play... but if they start showing tendencies toward a particular orientation as a young child, the anti-gay foster parents would beat it out of him (or her). I don't mean literally, but the child would be forced into the parent's societal conditioning. Religion doesn't help. It suppresses, admonishes, and remains rigid over every natural and beautiful thing we have in life's experiences, making us feel guilty for feeling too much.

Love is the only way. Not someone else's dictation or dogma.

Remember the story of the little boy who liked to dress like Daphne from Scooby Doo for Halloween, or dress like a princess? Spirits are pure and have no gender. I commend the parent of that little boy for supporting her son for being his own person.


reply posted on 5-3-2011 @ 12:11 AM by Garfee
reply to post by TruthxIsxInxThexMist



"In a landmark legal case, Eunice and Owen Johns argued that the rights of Christians are being ‘trumped’ by those of homosexuals..."

Don't like it so much when they get a taste of their own medicine do they?


reply posted on 5-3-2011 @ 12:16 PM by awake_and_aware
reply to post by PreownedMind



What a rediculous remark.

Look at the birth rates. Homosexuality isn't like Christianity, it doesn't beg for conversion.


reply posted on 15-3-2011 @ 05:21 PM by ravenflt
reply to post by TruthxIsxInxThexMist



Babies should have the right to have heterosexual parents, the human rights should cover this gray zone.


reply posted on 24-2-2012 @ 07:39 PM by Annee
Originally posted by ravenflt
reply to
post by TruthxIsxInxThexMist



Babies should have the right to have heterosexual parents, the human rights should cover this gray zone.


Babies should have the right to loving parents who want them. Who want to give them a loving home. Period.

There is no gray zone.


reply posted on 26-2-2012 @ 04:48 AM by korathin
Originally posted by Garfee
reply to
post by TruthxIsxInxThexMist



"In a landmark legal case, Eunice and Owen Johns argued that the rights of Christians are being ‘trumped’ by those of homosexuals..."

Don't like it so much when they get a taste of their own medicine do they?


lol. This is all intended. So Christians get riled up by the atheist/homosexual anti Christian persecutions and fall into fascism. That is why I find this so amusing, because during this age of fake tolerance almost every single gay person is telling the world that they are gay. So after the fascist's take over, everything that was done will be undone within a fortnight.

The minority is stupid when they begin to try and oppress the majority. Especially when the minority is an ultra minority, within a decade it will probably be a very serious crime to be gay in the UK.


reply posted on 28-4-2012 @ 07:47 AM by Sicksicksick
Originally posted by korathin
Originally posted by Garfee
reply to
post by TruthxIsxInxThexMist



"In a landmark legal case, Eunice and Owen Johns argued that the rights of Christians are being ‘trumped’ by those of homosexuals..."

Don't like it so much when they get a taste of their own medicine do they?


lol. This is all intended. So Christians get riled up by the atheist/homosexual anti Christian persecutions and fall into fascism. That is why I find this so amusing, because during this age of fake tolerance almost every single gay person is telling the world that they are gay. So after the fascist's take over, everything that was done will be undone within a fortnight.

The minority is stupid when they begin to try and oppress the majority. Especially when the minority is an ultra minority, within a decade it will probably be a very serious crime to be gay in the UK.


Nah. Within a decade it'll be a crime to be heterosexual in the UK.
edit on 28-4-2012 by Sicksicksick because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 28-4-2012 @ 07:49 AM by Sicksicksick
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by ravenflt
reply to
post by TruthxIsxInxThexMist



Babies should have the right to have heterosexual parents, the human rights should cover this gray zone.


Babies should have the right to loving parents who want them. Who want to give them a loving home. Period.

There is no gray zone.



Babies should be given both a mother and a father, not two mothers or two fathers.
Pages: <<  37    38    39    40    41  >>    ^^TOP^^



While we were Distracted with Gay Marriage news This happend today
  Posted 19 days ago with 81 member flags
People are marching in the streets all over Quebec
  Posted 4 days ago with 72 member flags
Breaking: Ron Paul to end active campaigning - cnn
  Posted 14 days ago with 26 member flags
President Obama Affirms His Support for Same Sex Marriage
  Posted 19 days ago with 24 member flags
Anon has released 1.7 GB of files....
  Posted 7 days ago with 24 member flags
Police Tasings Might Finally Be Ruled Brutality
  Posted 13 days ago with 23 member flags
US judge blocks indefinite detention of Americans
  Posted 12 days ago with 21 member flags