It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by IronArm
reply to post by Annee
Or mayhaps forwarding spending to more pressing issues, such as cancer research, hospital funding, educational expences...are a wee bit more more pressing than if a gay person has a brain that works differently that a normal one. Just a hypothesis.
Originally posted by IronArm
reply to post by Annee
The question again...is it wrong to raise a child as a heteroseuxal? No mind religion...raise them that men having sex with women is normal (procreation) and that men with men (non-essential pleasure) is wrong.
Originally posted by Annee
reply to post by getreadyalready
There is nothing wrong with gays reproductive system. They have the same biological capabilities you do.
If the only thing that mattered was functionality to produce the next generation - - they are just as capable as you.
IMO - - anyone that bored with sex - - is missing some kind of fulfillment in other parts of life.
Originally posted by Dendro
reply to post by IronArm
Muslims have been denied adoption rights based on their belief systems. I also know of Muslims, like Christians, who know when their teachings go too far or are too outdated and will adapt to the present time. In Islam when women have their first menstrual cycle they have to start wearing a head covering, though today only a small percentage actually follow that law anymore.
Originally posted by Annee
There is nothing wrong with gays reproductive system. They have the same biological capabilities you do.
If the only thing that mattered was functionality to produce the next generation - - they are just as capable as you.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
That statement is entirely wrong when looking at reproductive pairs. A homosexual pair has zero chance of reproduction.
Originally posted by IronArm
Originally posted by Dendro
reply to post by IronArm
Muslims have been denied adoption rights based on their belief systems. I also know of Muslims, like Christians, who know when their teachings go too far or are too outdated and will adapt to the present time. In Islam when women have their first menstrual cycle they have to start wearing a head covering, though today only a small percentage actually follow that law anymore.
That doens't happen too often in Canada...the whole adapting to "keep up with it" thing that is. And think about this...why has the world changed in the manner it has, so that morals have to be "updated"? Liberalization and justification became much more rampant methinks. But if you know of Muslims being denied, then I guess all organized (or personal religious beliefs) religions are harmful to all children, and no moral direction is needed to help them mature right?
Where do you think guilt comes from? How do you know that you would be wrong to steal your neighbours auto?
Your buddy's wife? Or is it just in time, as we learn that our teachings go too far (again) that it will be ok, and come out in the wash.
Originally posted by IronArm
reply to post by Annee
Well, lets look at all the counter-statements you made. My sister, she is severly disabled...no funeral stuff there. An ex, has a child with a near crippling Downs Syndrome...no funeral recomendations. That seems to be a little bit of side-note hodgepodge you heard from a friend of a friend. Assuming of course.
Originally posted by IronArm
as for the more pressing issue comment...what is truely more important? A life, or a lifestyle? Being able to breathe or being able to have do anything you wish, as backed by science? Ask a person with lung cancer which is more important.
Originally posted by IronArm
reply to post by Annee
Thats not nessisarily taking it personally...I've just never heard of such a thing. It seems rediculous.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
Originally posted by Annee
reply to post by getreadyalready
There is nothing wrong with gays reproductive system. They have the same biological capabilities you do.
If the only thing that mattered was functionality to produce the next generation - - they are just as capable as you.
IMO - - anyone that bored with sex - - is missing some kind of fulfillment in other parts of life.
That statement is entirely wrong when looking at reproductive pairs. A homosexual pair has zero chance of reproduction. They are not just as capable as heterosexual pair. The only way your statement make sense is if you are finally agreeing with me. We are born as part of a biolgical pair where everyone is equally functional to produce the next generation, so long as they enter a heterosexual arrangement. So, we are all born equally heterosexual from a biological standpoint. The ones that later enter a homosexual relationship are not responding to biological urges, but rather to psychological urges.
And, wouldn't being bored with sex point toward a lot of fulfillment in other parts of life? I can see how saying one was bored with a spouse could be interpreted as missing some other emotional attachment, but being bored with the act of sex is just a product of overexposure and finding other fulfilling activities. People get bored with baseball, or waterskiing, or stamp collecting, and it isn't indicative of missing some other fulfillment, it is just pure boredom, often it is burnout from overexposure, and often times other interesting activities get more allotted time.