posted on Feb, 28 2011 @ 06:42 PM
reply to post by Dendro
I understood it to be that the "hypothetical scenario" was broadcast by the BBC on national television a year earlier (May 2004), a remarkably similar
incident happened within days [or on the exact same day depending on which version of revisionist history you follow] of that "hypothetical scenario"
being played out in London as a mock exercise.
So it was planned, it was rehearsed, and then it happened. Viola!
Peter Power Picks A Pack Of Pickled Peppers
“At half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs
going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning"
“Today we were running an exercise for a company—bearing in mind I’m now in the private sector—and we sat everybody down, in the city—1,000
people involved in the whole organization—but the crisis team."
“Our scenario was very similar—it wasn’t totally identical, but it was based on bombs going off, to the time, the locations, all this sort of
stuff. But it wasn’t an accident, in the sense that London has a history of bombs.”
“Yesterday we were actually in the City working on an exercise involving mock broadcasts when it happened for real. When news bulletins started
coming on, people began to say how realistic our exercise was—not realizing there was an attack."
So if these tards were already conducting a mock exercise on the day, there's a very real chance there would already be on site medical facilities.
edit on 28-2-2011 by quackers because: (no reason given)