Originally posted by Alina
reply to post by arollingstone
If dis-info agents were real you would think they would be more aimed at television or things like facebook that are mass used, I can't really see a
government or company bothering to waste time on sites with so little traffic (compared to youtube and facebook) to really bother with it.
I also don't understand why people ridicule this page while refusing to say they're not a dis-info agent, I mean regardless of if dis-info agents
are real, or specifically if they actually care enough to be on this site, refusing to say you're not supports this threads paranoia of this legal
action being true.
You can argue this thread is wrong just as easily while saying you're not one, with more credibility, in fact.
I'm just tired of how loosely the term 'disinfo agent' is thrown around here, I don't want to support the idea this guys promoting because its
childish - especially telling everyone to put a link to the thread in their sig. Begging for S + F imo.
Even if someone was a disinfo agent, they would just say they're not because that's their job - to spread disinformation. There's a big hole in his
argument, why empower it by stating 'oh im not a disinfo agent'? Why should I have to do that? That's like investigating a crime and shouting
'everyone who
didn't commit this crime, say so!' on a megaphone. Like I said, has there ever even been a unanimous decision that one of the
members is an identified disinfo agent?
Let them be paranoid, disinfo agents are only effective if people don't use critical thought or common sense and rather, absorb everything they read.
I'm not going to validate this mentality and if people don't understand, want to call me a disinfo agent well then like I said, I don't care - grow
up. If I really was one, don't you think I'd just keep quiet rather than willingly reply to this thread and jeopardise my cover? That's what all
the disinfo agents are really doing. This is called common sense.