It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
This is a chart that the Air Force uses to show how public opinion is influenced by social media....
Spy bloggers not ‘friending’ U.S. targets, Centcom says
By Jeff Stein
The U.S. Central Command says its new “Persona” social media "infiltration" software is designed to cozy up to extremist bloggers overseas, not law-abiding Americans chatting on Facebook or similar sites.
Further compounding a sinister view of the software was the discovery of e-mails from the head of a company implicated in “dirty tricks” against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and a pro-labor organization, which discussed how such technology could be used.
"There are a variety of social media tricks we can use to add a level of realness to all fictitious personas...” wrote Aaron Barr, the chief executive officer of HBGary Federal, a Colorado Springs company whose hacked e-mails revealed plans to attack critics of Bank of America and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
Originally posted by Epiphron
Would it be wrong for us to use this Persona Management program to spread awareness about all the lies, corruption, and fraud by TPTB and how we’re being led into one world government?
It may be dishonest in a sense, but seeing as how we truly are in an information war right now, the ends would obviously justify the means. Waking people up to the grim reality we’re faced with is really the only way to stop what’s coming, and it seems like our chances are decreasing with each and every day that passes.
Imagine if even 100 of us all had 10 online personas each and went across the net posting on popular blogs, forums, news websites, and social networking sites, spreading truth, information, and knowledge.
Why not take a page out of the other team’s playbook and use it against them?
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
reply to post by TinfoilTP
Ah-hem, Dude!
You realize you are denying what the United States Central Command is not!
Spy bloggers not ‘friending’ U.S. targets, Centcom says
By Jeff Stein
The U.S. Central Command says its new “Persona” social media "infiltration" software is designed to cozy up to extremist bloggers overseas, not law-abiding Americans chatting on Facebook or similar sites.
voices.washingtonpost.com...
So according to both the Washington Post and the Pentagon's Central Command in charge of the Middle East this software is doing exactly what I laid out in the opening piece, cozying up to extremist bloggers overseas.
Re: the guys starting this protests.
So not only is this stuff real, not only was it not a waste of money, not only did the head of HB Gary not step down because it's a waste of money, but they are admitting this much above because of this:
Further compounding a sinister view of the software was the discovery of e-mails from the head of a company implicated in “dirty tricks” against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and a pro-labor organization, which discussed how such technology could be used.
"There are a variety of social media tricks we can use to add a level of realness to all fictitious personas...” wrote Aaron Barr, the chief executive officer of HBGary Federal, a Colorado Springs company whose hacked e-mails revealed plans to attack critics of Bank of America and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
voices.washingtonpost.com...
So we don't just have Proto saying these things, we have the United States Central Command admitting days after I made this thread publicly questioning whether they are using this software in the Middle East in relation to these uprisings and they are.
The Washington Post confirms that.
In addition we have HB Gary Emails clearly showing that yes, not only was the U.S. Military a satisfied customer of this software, but that efforts were being made to market it to large banks, and organizations for their own political use.
Not sure where you are getting your theories from friend, but your contentions aren't even remotely supported by the facts.
Thanks.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Originally posted by Epiphron
Would it be wrong for us to use this Persona Management program to spread awareness about all the lies, corruption, and fraud by TPTB and how we’re being led into one world government?
It may be dishonest in a sense, but seeing as how we truly are in an information war right now, the ends would obviously justify the means. Waking people up to the grim reality we’re faced with is really the only way to stop what’s coming, and it seems like our chances are decreasing with each and every day that passes.
Imagine if even 100 of us all had 10 online personas each and went across the net posting on popular blogs, forums, news websites, and social networking sites, spreading truth, information, and knowledge.
Why not take a page out of the other team’s playbook and use it against them?
The problem with doing that my friend, is yes, while you might win the battle eventually you will have lost the war.
The war to be different than those currently in charge of the system.
By resorting to their own tactics, you might as well in fact just resign to join them, as ultimately you would be no different than them, if to win and dominate it requires not being honest, and deliberately manipulating people.
Right now one of America's greatest obsticals to a brighter tomorrow is we have in fact abandoned those things we are supposed to prize, equality, justice, freedom against unreasonable search and seizure, torturing people, imprisoning them with out trial, making the tax payers bail out corporations, etc. etc. just to name a few, for the sake of expedience.
In other words we gave up the things that were supposed to make us different and special, just to in effect be exactly like the people we are made to decry though the government, that is in fact no different than the governments it is having us decry.
So yes, I think if we are to ever have an honest system, it can only come up through honest actions, so no, I don't recommend people fighting for the cause of freedom, truth, justice and frito lay to use this software.
Edit to add: I do see no problem with offering people free porn to join the resistence
It funny that since this thread has come out, all sorts of stuff is popping up that demonstrates just how the internet is being used as weapon, against the citizens in democratic nations.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
In an odd way that's all it really takes is a small but vocal group determined to not let something quietly die, and believe me, a lot of people in government, the military, and the corporate world really were hoping this would just fade quietly away.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
reply to post by TinfoilTP
See this might be your problem that you imagine Obama actually is in control of the Defense Department, don't you think it's a little strange that like at the Federal Reserve some of these heads stay on from one administration to the next even when they are appointed by a different party, originally, like Gates and Bernake are?
Obama is merely a puppet of much more powerful corporate interests, and yeah, they want the gas price to go up, and the economy to tank, and if you imagine Obama has actually been trying to fix the economy, I think you are really well, just not a very good judge of people or things.
Thanks.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
[
It's about whether ultimately you want to be seen as credible and legitimate, honest and trustworthy, or you just want to be that person who wants to win at any and all costs, and the only virtue you only then really have is wanting to win at all costs.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
reply to post by xuenchen
It's not so much about honesty as it is legitimacy and veracity my friend.
I was at Publix today where shopping is always a pleasure, where I happened to spy a member of the Surfside Town Council (the little incorporated town in North Miami Beach I live and the Publix is in) engaged in coversation with a few Orthodox Jewish Leaders in the community regarding a controversy over a recently errected temple for one of the Jewish subsects, that was erected in violation of the zoning laws where it was placed.
The town's mayor and majority vote of the City Council is sueing the Temple for 1,000,000.00 for the violation.
So they were discussing about how to get the Mayor recalled, and 3 of the council members who voted for the lawsuit.
I decided that conversation was more interesting than deciding which batch of green onions to select and waded in.
I said look here is the problem, if the Temple's not zoned, the Temples not zoned, if you put out a petition to recall these people and get a special ballot well, to a non Jew like me it looks like you as Jews are dictating the politics of the town, including where things can be built or not, specifically as they pertain to Jews.
I said are you guys nuts, and you wonder why people talk about Jewish conspiracies, you make yourselves look bad when you do it that way.
It's much better to put on the ballot a change of zoning, where you will still have enough clout as a demographic to get the zoning law changed, you get what you want, but you get what you want with out making it look like it's all about you and nothing but you.
The whole town gets to vote, there is a Jewish majority, so you will win the vote, and it doesn't make you look unseemly.
You could see the little light bulbs going off in their minds as they realized I was right.
Recalling the politicians that voted against them for violating the zoning laws, is petty and self serving, and dishonest to the extreme, legally getting the zoning changed is legitmate and honest as the day is long.
It's about whether ultimately you want to be seen as credible and legitimate, honest and trustworthy, or you just want to be that person who wants to win at any and all costs, and the only virtue you only then really have is wanting to win at all costs.
Let me put it to you this way, the Government and the Powers that Be are going to do everything in their power to make people who oppose them not seem credible, doing anything that gives them ammunition in that regard?
Not a good idea.
That's my two cents.
Thanks my friend.
Do You Think Social Media Fueled the Middle East Revolutions?
Obviously, in order for millions of people to risk their lives, they need to be horribly oppressed and defiant. But many of the tools of the Internet are what spread the word, not only inside the countries, cell phones and their cameras were ubiquitous, but to supporters and world leaders outside of the country. The fatal shooting of an Iranian woman, Neda Agha Soltan, in Iran, would, in an earlier age, have been covered up and forgotten. Instead, someone posted the killing and the aftermath on YouTube. She became the catalyst for the opposition and an example of the brutality of the Mullahs. In Egypt, Wael Ghonim, a Google executive who became a leader in the anti-government movement, told "60 Minutes" this exact thing: "Without Facebook, without Twitter, without Google, without YouTube, this would have never happened." Of course, you don't have to believe me. All you have to do is look at the reactions of the tyrants overseeing these countries and what they tried to do to desperately hold on to their power. Much like earlier despots, who would close the newspaper and take over the televisions to control the masses, the leaders went after the media that people were using to coordinate and spread information. That's why they shut down the Internet and cell phone transmissions. That seems like a damn good endorsement of the power of social media to me.
In wake of Tunisia, Egypt internet fueled uprisings, Durbin urges Facebook to protect human rights
WASHINGTON, D.C. Assistant Majority Leader Dick Durbin (D-IL) today urged social-networking company Facebook to take "immediate and tangible steps" to protect the human rights of democracy and human rights activists who use the firm's service. Writing to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Durbin said: "Recent events in Egypt and Tunisia have again highlighted the significant costs and benefits of social networking technology like Facebook to democracy and human rights activists. As millions of people around the world use Facebook to exercise their freedom of expression, I am concerned that the company does not have adequate safeguards in place to protect human rights and avoid being exploited by repressive governments." While Facebook has facilitated efforts by activists to organize demonstrations and publicize human-rights abuses, the Egyptian and Tunisian governments have reportedly used Facebook to monitor activists. Durbin highlighted his concern that Facebook does not allow activists to use pseudonyms.
Thank technology for Middle East uprising: Shirin Ebadi
Technology is increasing public awareness, which has resulted in the people of the Middle East taking to the streets to demand their rights, according to Shirin Ebadi, the winner of the Nobel Peace prize in 2003. Speaking at SOAS, the School of Oriental and African Studies, in London on February 2, Ms. Ebadi said in response to a question from euronews that the instant influence of technology makes it easy to see what happens in other regions and to follow suit. “Technology has robbed sound sleep from dictators,” she said. The disruption imposed on the internet in Egypt in the midst of protests against President Hosni Mubarak was a way of disrupting connectivity between the people, she added, and was reminiscent of similar actions by Iranian authorities after the June 2009 disputed presidential election that brought the largest crowds to Iran’s streets since the revolution in 1979.