The Lesson of Wisconsin, page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 24-2-2011 @ 06:48 PM by inforeal
We should understand what the essence of this problem is. The primary lesson that people should learn

That is when Republicans are in power the country suffers.

WHEN ARE THE CLUELESS AMERICAN PEOPLE GOING TO REALIZE THAT!

What we don’t understand is that Republicans are primitive, ignorant, bigoted, and complete puppets of the rich, who want to bring us back to a world of darkness and serfdom. If they win in 2012, believe me, the world will be in serious trouble.

Every Republican administration does something horribly evil.
Nixon with Watergate; Reagan Iran-Contra, and starting the neo-conservative movement . . . . And of course the last Bush; with the fake 911, and the Iraq holocaust.
The next Republican administration will likely be something particularly awful.

Unfortunately, the American people ALWAYS get duped by the canard “all politicians are the same” though the Republicans are 100 percent for the rich and at least the Democrats, though imperfect, are on the issues, in tune with the average middle class and lower middle class American.

It is the issues that matter, not the phony issue of budget deficits and interest in balancing the budget. There the Republicans are selective. When a Republican balloons the deficit its all right, but when a Democrat gets in office, even though in this case it was the Republican Bush’s bailout of Wall Street that ballooned the deficit, they forget about that and blame it all on the Democrat.

Where were the Republicans and the Tea party when Bush and Reagan were ballooning the deficit? Recall Clinton, as bad as he was with NAFTA, at least left a budget surplus in which the Republican Bush ruined with his tax cuts for the Rich and the Iraq war.


reply posted on 24-2-2011 @ 07:14 PM by 46ACE
This whole partisan thread is ridiculous for every Republican president there has been a democratic Congressional majority. and we are still in a porta potty rolling down hill.Stuff your o.p. simple.



Reagan years

Reagan, however, had failed to get the country out of the continued recession. Starting in 1980 and again after the 1982 midterm elections, President Reagan worked with a split Congress with a Republican majority after the 1980 Senate midterm elections and a Democratic majority after the 1980 House midterm elections. The conservatives (whom Reagan backed) lost a substantial number of seats in Congress in 1982.[100] By early 1983, however, the recession had ended and Reagan was re-elected President, in 1984, with a record-breaking 525 electoral votes.[101] The Republicans' six-year control over the Senate ended in 1986, after numerous issues (the Iran Contra Affair,[102] unpopular support for Reagan's aid to the Nicaraga Contras,[103] the cost of the Star Wars weapons program,[103] farming woes[103] and trade gaps)[103] damaged the Reagan Administration's image. By 1988, however, Reagan was redeemed of these scandals and Republican Vice President George H.W. Bush won the 1988 US Presidential election by a landslide.[104]

Clinton years

In the 1992 US Presidential election, Democratic candidate Bill Clinton defeated President Bush (who's image was damaged by economic woes)[105] [while the Democratic Party had a majority after both the Senate elections and Representatives elections of 1992. This shifted the balance of power in favor of the Democrats once a/b]gain. The Republicans, however, finally returned to a majority position, in both houses of Congress, in the election of 1994, thanks in part to: 1) President Clinton's unpopular attempt to establish universal health care;[106] and 2) Republican Congressman Newt Gingrich's Contract with America,[107] which was promoted heavily by the entire Republican Party.[108] By the 1996 US Presidential Election, Clinton's economic programs prevailed[citation needed] and the President was elected to a second term in a landslide victory. Despite Clinton's huge victory, however, the Democrats were still not able to regain control of either the US House of Representatives or Senate.
[edit] The rising influence of the media

Twenty-first century and partisanship
Smiling suit.
House Majority Leader Tom DeLay was dubbed the hammer for his enforcement of party discipline and retribution against those who did not support the legislative agenda of President George W. Bush.

The Congress in the first decade of the 21st century has been characterized by sometimes rather extreme partisanship, with many votes split precisely on party lines. Some analysts wonder whether fierce political infighting between Democrats and Republicans has prevented lawmakers from tackling tough issues such as global warming and deficit spending and prevented them from finding acceptable bipartisan compromises on issues.[126] In 2009, two former secretaries of State, one Republican, one Democrat, described America in 2009 as "riven with partisan bickering as we confront a range of serious threats — economic, political and military."[126] Congress, itself, has tried to make rulings to reduce partisanship; for example, H.Res.153.LTH discussed how personal choices about ethics were made on a partisan basis.[127] Intense partisanship combined with ethics probes can be a potent concoction; for example, representative Tom Delay was kicked out of the House based in part on his dealings with lobbyist Jack Abramoff.[128] Delay complained afterwards in the Washington Post about what he called the criminalization of politics: "it's not bad enough now to just beat 'em in policy or let them ruin your reputation ... they've got to bankrupt you, ruin your family, put you in jail, put you in the grave and then dance on your grave," said Delay.[128] Congress can still pass bills despite intense partisan opposition, such as the recent health care overhaul.[129]


en.wikipedia.org...


reply posted on 1-3-2011 @ 11:04 AM by NthOther
reply to post by inforeal



Seriously?

Maybe if people weren't so dependent on the state, they wouldn't be whining about having to be at least somewhat responsible for themselves, instead of stealing from everyone else.

It has nothing to do with political parties at all. The lesson, if any, we should take from what's going on in Wisconsin is that you're a fool, at best, if you depend on the government for anything. They will always take it away from you in the end. That's what governments do--whether you have a "D" or an "R" next to your name is completely irrelevant.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



A Dictator Is The Solution.
  Posted 2 days ago with 15 member flags
Why the need for Constant Growth?
  Posted 6 days ago with 7 member flags
Real Socialists. The Friends Of The Conservatives.
  Posted 15 days ago with 6 member flags
On What Date Did Human Freedom End?
  Posted 16 days ago with 5 member flags
So, is it really a female choice?
  Posted 2 days ago with 5 member flags