It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mossme89
Wait, if the argument was that the foreskin was cut off to discourage masturbation, how do you explain the fact tht i don't have a foreskin, yet still masturbate (albeit different than the conventional yanking, i sort of kick field goals)? XD
Originally posted by mossme89
(albeit different than the conventional yanking, i sort of kick field goals)? XD
Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes
I hate to veer off-topic, but the question really needs to be asked...
You mean instead of choking the chicken, you are more like a can-can dancer ?!
Originally posted by mossme89
I had to look that up on YouTube, but yes. One hand grasps and moves back and forth, while the other rubs the top. Choking the chicken only works if i'm REALLY horny.
Originally posted by bluemirage5
reply to post by peck420
Thats because young girls are now having the mandatory cervical cancer vaccine
HELLO!
Originally posted by bluemirage5
How many of you are aware of the statistics of infections of young uncircumcized boys that are having to be circumcized because of it???
Doctors against circumcism like to keep that fact swept under the carpet.
Originally posted by ToppDog
Where's the conspiracy here? If you want to have a discussion about conspiracy in relation to circumcisions, then why not start a thread about how the so-called woman's rights groups are too PC to forcefully speak up against female circumcision, which is not merely the removal of foreskin, but is actually the removal of the clitoris to keep women under control (the male equivalent of this would be chopping off the head of the penis).
Originally posted by Guido the Killer Pimp
Firstly, your parents make all your decisons for you until you are old enough to decide for yourself. There is no getting around this, and I doubt that this particual choice will be taken away from the parents anytime soon. Why? It is, simply put, unimportant. Who cares about the look of the tool? The penis exists for two reasons:
1)release of bodily waste
2)procreation
...if you want to name yours and give it a social life, that's fine...
..anyway...
Since the existance of foreskin doesn't add or subtract from either of these primary functions, I don't see the reason to feel one way or the other about it. However, to say that we have foreskin because nature intended us to have it is, quite frankly, not a good enough excuse. Human beings no longer need:
1)The tailbone
2)Tonsils
3)Wisdom Teeth
4)Appendix
Yet nature still provides us with all these things. Now, it wasn't fun getting my wisdom teeth out. But the roots of the tooth on the lower left side of my mouth were growing weird, and I had neglected to remove it, the roots would have grown into my jaw. Suffice to say, the dentist would have had to break my jaw to remove the useless tooth, and I would have been eating my meals through a straw. Also, if the appendix bursts, death follows...get my drift? Just because we have it, doesn't mean it's useful or nessecary.
GtkP